<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" xml:base="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/">
  <title type="text">PLoS Hubs for Clinical Trials: New Articles</title>
  
  <author>
    <name>PLoS</name>
    <uri>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/</uri>
    <email>webmaster@plos.org</email>
  </author>
  <subtitle>Publishing science</subtitle>
  <id>info:doi/10.1371/feed.phct</id>
  <rights>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License</rights>
  <icon>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/${webserver-url}images/favicon.ico</icon>
  <logo>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/${webserver-url}images/favicon.ico</logo>
  <updated>2012-05-20T22:15:13Z</updated>
  <feedburner:info uri="plosclinicaltrials/newarticles" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/feed/NewArticles" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicaltrials.ploshubs.org%2Ffeed%2FNewArticles" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicaltrials.ploshubs.org%2Ffeed%2FNewArticles" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicaltrials.ploshubs.org%2Ffeed%2FNewArticles" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/feed/NewArticles" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicaltrials.ploshubs.org%2Ffeed%2FNewArticles" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicaltrials.ploshubs.org%2Ffeed%2FNewArticles" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Fclinicaltrials.ploshubs.org%2Ffeed%2FNewArticles" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><entry>
    <title>What Parents of Children Who Have Received Emergency Care Think about Deferring Consent in Randomised Trials of Emergency Treatments: Postal Survey</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/NRXKPIo6aMA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035982" title="What Parents of Children Who Have Received Emergency Care Think about Deferring Consent in Randomised Trials of Emergency Treatments: Postal Survey" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035982&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) What Parents of Children Who Have Received Emergency Care Think about Deferring Consent in Randomised Trials of Emergency Treatments: Postal Survey" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035982&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) What Parents of Children Who Have Received Emergency Care Think about Deferring Consent in Randomised Trials of Emergency Treatments: Postal Survey" />
    <author>
      <name>Carrol Gamble et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035982</id>
    <updated>2012-05-07T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-07T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Carrol Gamble, Simon Nadel, Dee Snape, Andrew McKay, Helen Hickey, Paula Williamson, Linda Glennie, Claire Snowdon, Bridget Young&lt;/p&gt;
Objective &lt;p&gt;To investigate parents’ views about deferred consent to inform management of trial disclosure after a child’s death.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;A postal questionnaire survey was sent to members of the Meningitis Research Foundation UK charity, whose child had suffered from bacterial meningitis or meningococcal septicaemia within the previous 5 years. Main outcome measures were acceptability of deferred consent; timing of requesting consent; and the management of disclosure of the trial after a child’s death.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;220 families were sent questionnaires of whom 63 (29%) were bereaved. 68 families responded (31%), of whom 19 (28%) were bereaved. The majority (67%) was willing for their child to be involved in the trial without the trial being explained to them beforehand; 70% wanted to be informed about the trial as soon as their child’s condition had stabilised. In the event of a child’s death before the trial could be discussed the majority of bereaved parents (66% 12/18) anticipated wanting to be told about the trial at some time. This compared with 37% (18/49) of non-bereaved families (p = 0.06). Parents’ free text responses indicated that the word ‘trial’ held strongly negative connotations. A few parents regarded gaps in the evidence base about emergency treatments as indicating staff lacked expertise to care for a critically ill child. Bereaved parents’ free text responses indicated the importance of individualised management of disclosure about a trial following a child’s death.&lt;/p&gt; Discussion &lt;p&gt;Deferred consent is acceptable to the majority of respondents. Parents whose children had recovered differed in their views compared to bereaved parents. Most bereaved parents would want to be informed about the trial in the aftermath of a child’s death, although a minority strongly opposed such disclosure. Distinction should be drawn between the views of bereaved and non-bereaved parents when considering the acceptability of different consent processes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/NRXKPIo6aMA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035982</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Cardiovascular Disease Risk</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/tdHRJbsd1vo/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0036617" title="A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Cardiovascular Disease Risk" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036617&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Cardiovascular Disease Risk" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036617&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Cardiovascular Disease Risk" />
    <author>
      <name>Adam D. Gepner et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036617</id>
    <updated>2012-05-07T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-07T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Adam D. Gepner, Rekha Ramamurthy, Diane C. Krueger, Claudia E. Korcarz, Neil Binkley, James H. Stein&lt;/p&gt;
Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00690417&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01049048&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/tdHRJbsd1vo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0036617</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Duloxetine Inhibits Effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy") In Vitro and in Humans in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Laboratory Study</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/uS3TKOz2eLY/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0036476" title="Duloxetine Inhibits Effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy&quot;) In Vitro and in Humans in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Laboratory Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036476&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Duloxetine Inhibits Effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy&quot;) In Vitro and in Humans in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Laboratory Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036476&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Duloxetine Inhibits Effects of MDMA (“Ecstasy&quot;) In Vitro and in Humans in a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Laboratory Study" />
    <author>
      <name>Cédric M. Hysek et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036476</id>
    <updated>2012-05-04T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-04T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Cédric M. Hysek, Linda D. Simmler, Valentina G. Nicola, Nerina Vischer, Massimiliano Donzelli, Stephan Krähenbühl, Eric Grouzmann, Jörg Huwyler, Marius C. Hoener, Matthias E. Liechti&lt;/p&gt;
Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00990067&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/uS3TKOz2eLY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0036476</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Efficacy of Memantine for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Dementia: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/BEeDRKhxoXI/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035185" title="Efficacy of Memantine for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Dementia: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035185&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Efficacy of Memantine for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Dementia: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035185&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Efficacy of Memantine for Agitation in Alzheimer’s Dementia: A Randomised Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Chris Fox et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035185</id>
    <updated>2012-05-02T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-02T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Chris Fox, Monica Crugel, Ian Maidment, Bjorn Henrik Auestad, Simon Coulton, Adrian Treloar, Clive Ballard, Malaz Boustani, Cornelius Katona, Gill Livingston&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Agitation in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is common and associated with poor patient life-quality and carer distress. The best evidence-based pharmacological treatments are antipsychotics which have limited benefits with increased morbidity and mortality. There are no memantine trials in clinically significant agitation but post-hoc analyses in other populations found reduced agitation. We tested the primary hypothesis, memantine is superior to placebo for clinically significant agitation, in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;We recruited 153 participants with AD and clinically significant agitation from care-homes or hospitals for a double-blind randomised-controlled trial and 149 people started the trial of memantine versus placebo. The primary outcome was 6 weeks mixed model autoregressive analysis of Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI). Secondary outcomes were: 12 weeks CMAI; 6 and 12 weeks Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPI), Clinical Global Impression Change (CGI-C), Standardised Mini Mental State Examination, Severe Impairment Battery. Using a mixed effects model we found no significant differences in the primary outcome, 6 weeks CMAI, between memantine and placebo (memantine lower −3.0; −8.3 to 2.2, p = 0.26); or 12 weeks CMAI; or CGI-C or adverse events at 6 or 12 weeks. NPI mean difference favoured memantine at weeks 6 (−6.9; −12.2 to −1.6; p = 0.012) and 12 (−9.6; −15.0 to −4.3 p = 0.0005). Memantine was significantly better than placebo for cognition. The main study limitation is that it still remains to be determined whether memantine has a role in milder agitation in AD.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Memantine did not improve significant agitation in people with in moderate-to-severe AD. Future studies are urgently needed to test other pharmacological candidates in this group and memantine for neuropsychiatric symptoms.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00371059&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial 24953404&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/BEeDRKhxoXI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035185</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ghrelin Treatment of Cachectic Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/gyXTjf9pbgs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035708" title="Ghrelin Treatment of Cachectic Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035708&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Ghrelin Treatment of Cachectic Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035708&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Ghrelin Treatment of Cachectic Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Keisuke Miki et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035708</id>
    <updated>2012-05-01T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-05-01T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Keisuke Miki, Ryoji Maekura, Noritoshi Nagaya, Masamitsu Nakazato, Hiroshi Kimura, Shinsuke Murakami, Shunsuke Ohnishi, Toru Hiraga, Mari Miki, Seigo Kitada, Kenji Yoshimura, Yoshitaka Tateishi, Yasuji Arimura, Nobuhiro Matsumoto, Masanori Yoshikawa, Kenichi Yamahara, Kenji Kangawa&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Pulmonary cachexia is common in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), culminating in exercise intolerance and a poor prognosis. Ghrelin is a novel growth hormone (GH)-releasing peptide with GH-independent effects. The efficacy and safety of adding ghrelin to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in cachectic COPD patients were investigated.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 33 cachectic COPD patients were randomly assigned PR with intravenous ghrelin (2 µg/kg) or placebo twice daily for 3 weeks in hospital. The primary outcomes were changes in 6-min walk distance (6-MWD) and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, and respiratory muscle strength. At pre-treatment, serum GH levels were increased from baseline levels by a single dose of ghrelin (mean change, +46.5 ng/ml; between-group p&lt;0.0001), the effect of which continued during the 3-week treatment. In the ghrelin group, the mean change from pre-treatment in 6-MWD was improved at Week 3 (+40 m, within-group p = 0.033) and was maintained at Week 7 (+47 m, within-group p = 0.017), although the difference between ghrelin and placebo was not significant. At Week 7, the mean changes in SGRQ symptoms (between-group p = 0.026), in MRC (between-group p = 0.030), and in maximal expiratory pressure (MEP; between-group p = 0.015) were better in the ghrelin group than in the placebo group. Additionally, repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated significant time course effects of ghrelin versus placebo in SGRQ symptoms (p = 0.049) and MEP (p = 0.021). Ghrelin treatment was well tolerated.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;In cachectic COPD patients, with the safety profile, ghrelin administration provided improvements in symptoms and respiratory strength, despite the lack of a significant between-group difference in 6-MWD.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;UMIN Clinical Trial Registry C000000061&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/gyXTjf9pbgs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035708</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/nEcLfk31yOo/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0036077" title="Treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036077&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036077&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Treatment of Aspergillus fumigatus in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study" />
    <author>
      <name>Shawn D. Aaron et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0036077</id>
    <updated>2012-04-30T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-30T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Shawn D. Aaron, Katherine L. Vandemheen, Andreas Freitag, Linda Pedder, William Cameron, Annick Lavoie, Nigel Paterson, Pearce Wilcox, Harvey Rabin, Elizabeth Tullis, Nancy Morrison, Felix Ratjen&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Many patients with cystic fibrosis develop persistent airway infection/colonization with &lt;i&gt;Aspergillus fumigatus&lt;/i&gt;, however the impact of &lt;i&gt;A. fumigatus&lt;/i&gt; on clinical outcomes remains unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether treatment directed against &lt;i&gt;Aspergillus fumigatus&lt;/i&gt; improves pulmonary function and clinical outcomes in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled pilot clinical trial involving 35 patients with CF whose sputum cultures were chronically positive for &lt;i&gt;A. fumigatus&lt;/i&gt;. Participants were centrally randomized to receive either oral itraconazole 5 mg/kg/d (N = 18) or placebo (N = 17) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who experienced a respiratory exacerbation requiring intravenous antibiotics over the 24 week treatment period. Secondary outcomes included changes in FEV&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; and quality of life.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Over the 24 week treatment period, 4 of 18 (22%) patients randomized to itraconazole experienced a respiratory exacerbation requiring intravenous antibiotics, compared to 5 of 16 (31%) placebo treated patients, P = 0.70. FEV&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; declined by 4.62% over 24 weeks in the patients randomized to itraconazole, compared to a 0.32% improvement in the placebo group (between group difference = −4.94%, 95% CI: −15.33 to 5.45, P = 0.34). Quality of life did not differ between the 2 treatment groups throughout the study. Therapeutic itraconazole blood levels were not achieved in 43% of patients randomized to itraconazole.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;We did not identify clinical benefit from itraconazole treatment for CF patients whose sputum was chronically colonized with &lt;i&gt;A. fumigatus&lt;/i&gt;. Limitations of this pilot study were its small sample size, and failure to achieve therapeutic levels of itraconazole in many patients.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00528190&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/nEcLfk31yOo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0036077</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Empirical Power and Sample Size Calculations for Cluster-Randomized and Cluster-Randomized Crossover Studies</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/cTMt38gVFgo/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035564" title="Empirical Power and Sample Size Calculations for Cluster-Randomized and Cluster-Randomized Crossover Studies" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035564&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Empirical Power and Sample Size Calculations for Cluster-Randomized and Cluster-Randomized Crossover Studies" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035564&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Empirical Power and Sample Size Calculations for Cluster-Randomized and Cluster-Randomized Crossover Studies" />
    <author>
      <name>Nicholas G. Reich et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035564</id>
    <updated>2012-04-27T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-27T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Nicholas G. Reich, Jessica A. Myers, Daniel Obeng, Aaron M. Milstone, Trish M. Perl&lt;/p&gt;

        In recent years, the number of studies using a cluster-randomized design has grown dramatically. In addition, the cluster-randomized crossover design has been touted as a methodological advance that can increase efficiency of cluster-randomized studies in certain situations. While the cluster-randomized crossover trial has become a popular tool, standards of design, analysis, reporting and implementation have not been established for this emergent design. We address one particular aspect of cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized crossover trial design: estimating statistical power. We present a general framework for estimating power via simulation in cluster-randomized studies with or without one or more crossover periods. We have implemented this framework in the clusterPower software package for R, freely available online from the Comprehensive R Archive Network. Our simulation framework is easy to implement and users may customize the methods used for data analysis. We give four examples of using the software in practice. The clusterPower package could play an important role in the design of future cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized crossover studies. This work is the first to establish a universal method for calculating power for both cluster-randomized and cluster-randomized clinical trials. More research is needed to develop standardized and recommended methodology for cluster-randomized crossover studies.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/cTMt38gVFgo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035564</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food for Catch-Up Growth in Children after an Episode of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: An Open Randomised Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/3kKe8NQJOaU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035006" title="Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food for Catch-Up Growth in Children after an Episode of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: An Open Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035006&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food for Catch-Up Growth in Children after an Episode of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: An Open Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035006&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food for Catch-Up Growth in Children after an Episode of Plasmodium falciparum Malaria: An Open Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Saskia van der Kam et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035006</id>
    <updated>2012-04-25T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-25T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Saskia van der Kam, Todd Swarthout, Oscar Niragira, Alyson Froud, Eric Mukomena Sompwe, Clair Mills, Stephanie Roll, Peter Tinnemann, Leslie Shanks&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Catch-up growth after an infection is essential for children to maintain good nutritional status. To prevent malnutrition, WHO recommends that children are given one additional healthy meal per day during the 2 weeks after onset of illness. We investigated to what extent ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) promotes catch-up growth in children after an acute, uncomplicated episode of &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium falciparum&lt;/i&gt; malaria.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We did an open randomised trial of children aged 6–59 months with confirmed malaria who attended a Médecins Sans Frontières-supported outpatient clinic in Katanga Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. All children received a clinical examination and malaria treatment. Patients were then randomly assigned to either an RUTF group, who received daily supplemental RUTF (a high-protein peanut-based paste) for 14 days, or to a control group, who received no supplemental food. Children were weighed at baseline and on days 14 and 28. The primary outcome was mean weight change after 14 days' RUTF. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;93 children received RUTF and 87 received no food supplementation. At day 14, the RUTF group had a mean weight gain of 353 g compared with 189 g in the control group (difference 164 [95%CI 52–277], p = 0.005). However, at day 28 there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (539 g versus 414 g, respectively [p = 0.053]). Similarly, rate of weight gain per kg bodyweight per day was significantly higher at day 14 in the RUTF group (2.4 g/kg per day versus 1.3 g/kg per day, p = 0.005) but at day 28 was 1.9 g/kg per day in the RUTF group versus 1.5 g/kg per day in the control group (p = 0.076).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Children receiving RUTF for 14 days after effective treatment of an uncomplicated malaria episode had a faster weight gain than children not given supplementation, reducing the period that children were at risk of malnutrition.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00819858&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/3kKe8NQJOaU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035006</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/Nafwcif6wSc/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035032" title="The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035032&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035032&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The Incidence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA): A Meta Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Baohui Yang et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035032</id>
    <updated>2012-04-25T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-25T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Baohui Yang, Haopeng Li, Ting Zhang, Xijing He, Siyue Xu&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Cervical disc arthroplasty is being used as an alternative degenerative disc disease treatment with fusion of the cervical spine in order to preserve motion. However, whether replacement arthoplasty in the spine achieves its primary patient centered objective of lowering the frequency of adjacent segment degeneration is not verified yet.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology &lt;p&gt;We conducted a meta-analysis according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase. The inclusion criteria were: 1) Randomized, controlled study of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine involving single segment or double segments using Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as controls; 2) A minimum of two-year follow-up using imaging and clinical analyses; 3) Definite diagnostic evidences for “adjacent segment degeneration” and “adjacent segment disease”; 4) At least a minimum of 30 patients per population. Two authors independently selected trials; assessed methodological quality, extracted data and the results were pooled.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;No study has specifically compared the results of adjacent segment degenerative; Two papers describing 140 patients with 162 symptomatic cervical segment disorders and compared the rate of postoperative adjacent segment disease development between CDA and ACDF treatments, three publications describing the rate of adjacent-segment surgery including 1273 patients with symptomatic cervical segments. The result of the meta-analysis indicates that there were fewer the rate of adjacent segment disease and the rate for adjacent-segment surgery comparing CDA with ACDF, but the difference was not statistically significant.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Based on available evidence, it cannot be concluded, that CDA can significantly reduce the postoperative rate of the adjacent segment degenerative and adjacent segment disease. However, due to some limitations, the results of this meta-analysis should be cautiously accepted, and further studies are needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/Nafwcif6wSc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0035032</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/iUu4uv5j0Ew/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001208" title="Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001208&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001208&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>David P. van der Ham et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>on behalf of the PPROMEXIL trial group</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001208</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-24T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by David P. van der Ham, Sylvia M. C. Vijgen, Jan G. Nijhuis, Johannes J. van Beek, Brent C. Opmeer, Antonius L. M. Mulder, Rob Moonen, Mariët Groenewout, Mariëlle G. van Pampus, Gerald D. Mantel, Kitty W. M. Bloemenkamp, Wim J. van Wijngaarden, Marko Sikkema, Monique C. Haak, Paula J. M. Pernet, Martina Porath, Jan F. M. Molkenboer, Simone Kuppens, Anneke Kwee, Michael E. Kars, Mallory Woiski, Martin J. N. Weinans, Hajo I. J. Wildschut, Bettina M. C. Akerboom, Ben W. J. Mol, Christine Willekes, on behalf of the PPROMEXIL trial group&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;At present, there is insufficient evidence to guide appropriate management of women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) near term.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;We conducted an open-label randomized controlled trial in 60 hospitals in The Netherlands, which included non-laboring women with &gt;24 h of PPROM between 34&lt;sup&gt;+0&lt;/sup&gt; and 37&lt;sup&gt;+0&lt;/sup&gt; wk of gestation. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1∶1 ratio to induction of labor (IoL) or expectant management (EM) using block randomization. The main outcome was neonatal sepsis. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and chorioamnionitis. Patients and caregivers were not blinded to randomization status. We updated a prior meta-analysis on the effect of both interventions on neonatal sepsis, RDS, and cesarean section rate.From 1 January 2007 to 9 September 2009, 776 patients in 60 hospitals were eligible for the study, of which 536 patients were randomized. Four patients were excluded after randomization. We allocated 266 women (268 neonates) to IoL and 266 women (270 neonates) to EM. Neonatal sepsis occurred in seven (2.6%) newborns of women in the IoL group and in 11 (4.1%) neonates in the EM group (relative risk [RR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 1.6). RDS was seen in 21 (7.8%, IoL) versus 17 neonates (6.3%, EM) (RR 1.3; 95% CI 0.67 to 2.3), and a cesarean section was performed in 36 (13%, IoL) versus 37 (14%, EM) women (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.50). The risk for chorioamnionitis was reduced in the IoL group. No serious adverse events were reported.Updating an existing meta-analysis with our trial results (the only eligible trial for the update) indicated RRs of 1.06 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.76) for neonatal sepsis (eight trials, 1,230 neonates) and 1.27 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.65) for cesarean section (eight trials, 1,222 women) for IoL compared with EM.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;In women whose pregnancy is complicated by late PPROM, neither our trial nor the updated meta-analysis indicates that IoL substantially improves pregnancy outcomes compared with EM.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29313500&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/iUu4uv5j0Ew" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001208</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Driven versus Routine Laboratory Monitoring of Antiretroviral Therapy in Uganda and Zimbabwe</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/M6n3hh7m8F4/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033672" title="Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Driven versus Routine Laboratory Monitoring of Antiretroviral Therapy in Uganda and Zimbabwe" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033672&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Driven versus Routine Laboratory Monitoring of Antiretroviral Therapy in Uganda and Zimbabwe" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033672&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Driven versus Routine Laboratory Monitoring of Antiretroviral Therapy in Uganda and Zimbabwe" />
    <author>
      <name>Antonieta Medina Lara et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>on behalf of the DART Trial Team</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033672</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-24T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Antonieta Medina Lara, Jesse Kigozi, Jovita Amurwon, Lazarus Muchabaiwa, Barbara Nyanzi Wakaholi, Ruben E. Mujica Mota, A. Sarah Walker, Ronnie Kasirye, Francis Ssali, Andrew Reid, Heiner Grosskurth, Abdel G. Babiker, Cissy Kityo, Elly Katabira, Paula Munderi, Peter Mugyenyi, James Hakim, Janet Darbyshire, Diana M. Gibb, Charles F. Gilks, on behalf of the DART Trial Team&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Despite funding constraints for treatment programmes in Africa, the costs and economic consequences of routine laboratory monitoring for efficacy and toxicity of antiretroviral therapy (ART) have rarely been evaluated.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted in the DART trial (ISRCTN13968779). Adults in Uganda/Zimbabwe starting ART were randomised to clinically-driven monitoring (CDM) or laboratory and clinical monitoring (LCM); individual patient data on healthcare resource utilisation and outcomes were valued with primary economic costs and utilities. Total costs of first/second-line ART, routine 12-weekly CD4 and biochemistry/haematology tests, additional diagnostic investigations, clinic visits, concomitant medications and hospitalisations were considered from the public healthcare sector perspective. A Markov model was used to extrapolate costs and benefits 20 years beyond the trial.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;3316 (1660LCM;1656CDM) symptomatic, immunosuppressed ART-naive adults (median (IQR) age 37 (32,42); CD4 86 (31,139) cells/mm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;) were followed for median 4.9 years. LCM had a mean 0.112 year (41 days) survival benefit at an additional mean cost of $765 [95%CI:685,845], translating into an adjusted incremental cost of $7386 [3277,dominated] per life-year gained and $7793 [4442,39179] per quality-adjusted life year gained. Routine toxicity tests were prominent cost-drivers and had no benefit. With 12-weekly CD4 monitoring from year 2 on ART, low-cost second-line ART, but without toxicity monitoring, CD4 test costs need to fall below $3.78 to become cost-effective (&lt;3xper-capita GDP, following WHO benchmarks). CD4 monitoring at current costs as undertaken in DART was not cost-effective in the long-term.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;There is no rationale for routine toxicity monitoring, which did not affect outcomes and was costly. Even though beneficial, there is little justification for routine 12-weekly CD4 monitoring of ART at current test costs in low-income African countries. CD4 monitoring, restricted to the second year on ART onwards, could be cost-effective with lower cost second-line therapy and development of a cheaper, ideally point-of-care, CD4 test.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/M6n3hh7m8F4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033672</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A 6 Week Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ziprasidone for the Acute Depressive Mixed State</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/Y7d7qPY7SPA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034757" title="A 6 Week Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ziprasidone for the Acute Depressive Mixed State" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034757&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) A 6 Week Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ziprasidone for the Acute Depressive Mixed State" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034757&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) A 6 Week Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Ziprasidone for the Acute Depressive Mixed State" />
    <author>
      <name>Ashwin Patkar et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034757</id>
    <updated>2012-04-24T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-24T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Ashwin Patkar, William Gilmer, Chi-un Pae, Paul A. Vöhringer, Michael Ziffra, Edward Pirok, Molly Mulligan, Megan M. Filkowski, Elizabeth A. Whitham, Niki S. Holtzman, Sairah B. Thommi, Tanya Logvinenko, Antony Loebel, Prakash Masand, S. Nassir Ghaemi&lt;/p&gt;
Objective &lt;p&gt;To examine the efficacy of ziprasidone vs. placebo for the depressive mixed state in patients with bipolar disorder type II or major depressive disorder (MDD).&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;73 patients were randomized in a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to ziprasidone (40-160 mg/d) or placebo for 6 weeks. They met DSM-IV criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE), while also meeting 2 or 3 (but not more nor less) DSM-IV manic criteria. They did not meet DSM-IV criteria for a mixed or manic episode. Baseline psychotropic drugs were continued unchanged. The primary endpoint measured was Montgomery- Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores over time. The mean dose of ziprasidone was 129.7±45.3 mg/day and 126.1±47.1 mg/day for placebo.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;The primary outcome analysis indicated efficacy of ziprasidone versus placebo (p = 0.0038). Efficacy was more pronounced in type II bipolar disorder than in MDD (p = 0.036). Overall ziprasidone was well tolerated, without notable worsening of weight or extrapyramidal symptoms.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;There was a statistically significant benefit with ziprasidone versus placebo in this first RCT of any medication for the provisional diagnostic concept of the depressive mixed state.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00490542&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/Y7d7qPY7SPA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034757</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Pregnancy Incidence and Correlates during the HVTN 503 Phambili HIV Vaccine Trial Conducted among South African Women</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/6RGQbp7NBk4/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031387" title="Pregnancy Incidence and Correlates during the HVTN 503 Phambili HIV Vaccine Trial Conducted among South African Women" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031387&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Pregnancy Incidence and Correlates during the HVTN 503 Phambili HIV Vaccine Trial Conducted among South African Women" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031387&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Pregnancy Incidence and Correlates during the HVTN 503 Phambili HIV Vaccine Trial Conducted among South African Women" />
    <author>
      <name>Mary H. Latka et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>on behalf of the HVTN 503 Phambili study team</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031387</id>
    <updated>2012-04-19T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-19T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Mary H. Latka, Katherine Fielding, Glenda E. Gray, Linda-Gail Bekker, Maphoshane Nchabeleng, Koleka Mlisana, Tanya Nielson, Surita Roux, Baningi Mkhize, Matsontso Mathebula, Nivashnee Naicker, Guy de Bruyn, James Kublin, Gavin J. Churchyard, on behalf of the HVTN 503 Phambili study team&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;HIV prevention trials are increasingly being conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Women at risk for HIV are also at risk of pregnancy. To maximize safety, women agree to avoid pregnancy during trials, yet pregnancies occur. Using data from the HVTN 503/“Phambili” vaccine trial, we report pregnancy incidence during and after the vaccination period and identify factors, measured at screening, associated with incident pregnancy.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;To enrol in the trial, women agreed and were supported to avoid pregnancy until 1 month after their third and final vaccination (“vaccination period”), corresponding to the first 7 months of follow-up. Unsterilized women, pooled across study arms, were analyzed. Poisson regression compared pregnancy rates during and after the vaccination period. Cox proportional hazards regression identified associations with first pregnancy.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Among 352 women (median age 23 yrs; median follow-up 1.5 yrs), pregnancy incidence was 9.6/100 women-years overall and 6.8/100 w-yrs and 11.3/100 w-yrs during and after the vaccination period, respectively [Rate Ratio = 0.60 (0.32–1.14), p = 0.10]. In multivariable analysis, pregnancy was reduced among women who: enrolled at sites providing contraception on-site [HR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.22–0.86)]; entered the trial as injectable contraceptive users [HR = 0.37 (0.21–0.67)] or as consistent condom users (trend) [HR = 0.54 (0.28–1.04)]. Compared with women with a single partner of HIV-unknown status, pregnancy rates were increased among women with: a single partner whose status was HIV-negative [HR = 2.34(1.16–4.73)] and; 2 partners both of HIV-unknown status [HR = 4.42(1.59–12.29)]. Women with 2 more of these risk factors: marijuana use, heavy drinking, or use of either during sex, had increased pregnancy incidence [HR = 2.66 (1.24–5.72)].&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;It is possible to screen South African women for pregnancy risk at trial entry. Providing injectable contraception for free on-site and supporting consistent condom use may reduce incident pregnancy. Screening should determine the substance use, partnering, and HIV status of both members of the couple for both pregnancy and HIV prevention.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;SA National Health Research Database DOH-27-0207-1539; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00413725&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/6RGQbp7NBk4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031387</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Did Clinical Trials in Which Erythropoietin Failed to Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarct Size Miss a Narrow Therapeutic Window?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/kNEx5-wWzus/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034819" title="Did Clinical Trials in Which Erythropoietin Failed to Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarct Size Miss a Narrow Therapeutic Window?" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034819&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Did Clinical Trials in Which Erythropoietin Failed to Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarct Size Miss a Narrow Therapeutic Window?" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034819&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Did Clinical Trials in Which Erythropoietin Failed to Reduce Acute Myocardial Infarct Size Miss a Narrow Therapeutic Window?" />
    <author>
      <name>Mark I. Talan et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034819</id>
    <updated>2012-04-18T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-18T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Mark I. Talan, Ismayil Ahmet, Edward G. Lakatta&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;To test a hypothesis that in negative clinical trials of erythropoietin in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) the erythropoietin (rhEPO) could be administered outside narrow therapeutic window. Despite overwhelming evidence of cardioprotective properties of rhEPO in animal studies, the outcomes of recently concluded phase II clinical trials have failed to demonstrate the efficacy of rhEPO in patients with acute MI. However, the time between symptoms onset and rhEPO administration in negative clinical trials was much longer that in successful animal experiments.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;MI was induced in rats either by a permanent ligation of a descending coronary artery or by a 2-hr occlusion followed by a reperfusion. rhEPO, 3000 IU/kg, was administered intraperitoneally at the time of reperfusion, 4 hrs after beginning of reperfusion, or 6 hrs after permanent occlusion. MI size was measured histologically 24 hrs after coronary occlusion. The area of myocardium at risk was similar among groups. The MI size in untreated rats averaged ∼42% of area at risk, or ∼24% of left ventricle, and was reduced by more than 50% (p&lt;0.001) in rats treated with rhEPO at the time of reperfusion. The MI size was not affected by treatment administered 4 hrs after reperfusion or 6 hrs after permanent coronary occlusion. Therefore, our study in a rat experimental model of MI demonstrates that rhEPO administered within 2 hrs of a coronary occlusion effectively reduces MI size, but when rhEPO was administered following a delay similar to that encountered in clinical trials, it had no effect on MI size.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;The clinical trials that failed to demonstrate rhEPO efficacy in patients with MI may have missed a narrow therapeutic window defined in animal experiments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/kNEx5-wWzus" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034819</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Designing and Analyzing Clinical Trials with Composite Outcomes: Consideration of Possible Treatment Differences between the Individual Outcomes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/GyTsUQj2Noc/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034785" title="Designing and Analyzing Clinical Trials with Composite Outcomes: Consideration of Possible Treatment Differences between the Individual Outcomes" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034785&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Designing and Analyzing Clinical Trials with Composite Outcomes: Consideration of Possible Treatment Differences between the Individual Outcomes" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034785&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Designing and Analyzing Clinical Trials with Composite Outcomes: Consideration of Possible Treatment Differences between the Individual Outcomes" />
    <author>
      <name>Janice Pogue et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034785</id>
    <updated>2012-04-17T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-17T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Janice Pogue, P. J. Devereaux, Lehana Thabane, Salim Yusuf&lt;/p&gt;

        When the individual outcomes within a composite outcome appear to have different treatment effects, either in magnitude or direction, researchers may question the validity or appropriateness of using this composite outcome as a basis for measuring overall treatment effect in a randomized controlled trial. The question remains as to how to distinguish random variation in estimated treatment effects from important heterogeneity within a composite outcome. This paper suggests there may be some utility in directly testing the assumption of homogeneity of treatment effect across the individual outcomes within a composite outcome. We describe a treatment heterogeneity test for composite outcomes based on a class of models used for the analysis of correlated data arising from the measurement of multiple outcomes for the same individuals. Such a test may be useful in planning a trial with a primary composite outcome and at trial end with final analysis and presentation. We demonstrate how to determine the statistical power to detect composite outcome treatment heterogeneity using the POISE Trial data. Then we describe how this test may be incorporated into a presentation of trial results with composite outcomes. We conclude that it may be informative for trialists to assess the consistency of treatment effects across the individual outcomes within a composite outcome using a formalized methodology and the suggested test represents one option.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/GyTsUQj2Noc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034785</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Caloric Restriction Alters the Metabolic Response to a Mixed-Meal: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/U3C6Y5avZho/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028190" title="Caloric Restriction Alters the Metabolic Response to a Mixed-Meal: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028190&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Caloric Restriction Alters the Metabolic Response to a Mixed-Meal: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028190&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Caloric Restriction Alters the Metabolic Response to a Mixed-Meal: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Kim M. Huffman et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028190</id>
    <updated>2012-04-16T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-16T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Kim M. Huffman, Leanne M. Redman, Lawrence R. Landerman, Carl F. Pieper, Robert D. Stevens, Michael J. Muehlbauer, Brett R. Wenner, James R. Bain, Virginia B. Kraus, Christopher B. Newgard, Eric Ravussin, William E. Kraus&lt;/p&gt;
Objectives &lt;p&gt;To determine if caloric restriction (CR) would cause changes in plasma metabolic intermediates in response to a mixed meal, suggestive of changes in the capacity to adapt fuel oxidation to fuel availability or metabolic flexibility, and to determine how any such changes relate to insulin sensitivity (S&lt;sub&gt;I&lt;/sub&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;Forty-six volunteers were randomized to a weight maintenance diet (Control), 25% CR, or 12.5% CR plus 12.5% energy deficit from structured aerobic exercise (CR+EX), or a liquid calorie diet (890 kcal/d until 15% reduction in body weight)for six months. Fasting and postprandial plasma samples were obtained at baseline, three, and six months. A targeted mass spectrometry-based platform was used to measure concentrations of individual free fatty acids (FFA), amino acids (AA), and acylcarnitines (AC). S&lt;sub&gt;I&lt;/sub&gt; was measured with an intravenous glucose tolerance test.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Over three and six months, there were significantly larger differences in fasting-to-postprandial (FPP) concentrations of medium and long chain AC (byproducts of FA oxidation) in the CR relative to Control and a tendency for the same in CR+EX (CR-3 month P = 0.02; CR-6 month P = 0.002; CR+EX-3 month P = 0.09; CR+EX-6 month P = 0.08). After three months of CR, there was a trend towards a larger difference in FPP FFA concentrations (P = 0.07; CR-3 month P = 0.08). Time-varying differences in FPP concentrations of AC and AA were independently related to time-varying S&lt;sub&gt;I&lt;/sub&gt; (P&lt;0.05 for both).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Based on changes in intermediates of FA oxidation following a food challenge, CR imparted improvements in metabolic flexibility that correlated with improvements in S&lt;sub&gt;I&lt;/sub&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00099151&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/U3C6Y5avZho" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028190</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/yZ58_CHpVGc/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001201" title="The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001201&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001201&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The Imperative to Share Clinical Study Reports: Recommendations from the Tamiflu Experience" />
    <author>
      <name>Peter Doshi et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001201</id>
    <updated>2012-04-10T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-10T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Peter Doshi, Tom Jefferson, Chris Del Mar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/yZ58_CHpVGc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001201</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Open Clinical Trial Data for All? A View from Regulators</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/6Ya08Roo_zc/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001202" title="Open Clinical Trial Data for All? A View from Regulators" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001202&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Open Clinical Trial Data for All? A View from Regulators" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001202&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Open Clinical Trial Data for All? A View from Regulators" />
    <author>
      <name>Hans-Georg Eichler et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001202</id>
    <updated>2012-04-10T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-10T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Hans-Georg Eichler, Eric Abadie, Alasdair Breckenridge, Hubert Leufkens, Guido Rasi&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/6Ya08Roo_zc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001202</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Reappraisal of Metformin Efficacy in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/MmToVpVsiCE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001204" title="Reappraisal of Metformin Efficacy in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001204&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Reappraisal of Metformin Efficacy in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001204&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Reappraisal of Metformin Efficacy in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Rémy Boussageon et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001204</id>
    <updated>2012-04-10T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-04-10T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Rémy Boussageon, Irène Supper, Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant, Nadir Kellou, Michel Cucherat, Jean-Pierre Boissel, Behrouz Kassai, Alain Moreau, François Gueyffier, Catherine Cornu&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The UK Prospective Diabetes Study showed that metformin decreases mortality compared to diet alone in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Since then, it has been the first-line treatment in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. However, metformin-sulphonylurea bitherapy may increase mortality.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials evaluated metformin efficacy (in studies of metformin versus diet alone, versus placebo, and versus no treatment; metformin as an add-on therapy; and metformin withdrawal) against cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane database. Primary end points were all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death. Secondary end points included all myocardial infarctions, all strokes, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, leg amputations, and microvascular complications. Thirteen randomised controlled trials (13,110 patients) were retrieved; 9,560 patients were given metformin, and 3,550 patients were given conventional treatment or placebo. Metformin did not significantly affect the primary outcomes all-cause mortality, risk ratio (RR) = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.75 to 1.31), and cardiovascular mortality, RR = 1.05 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.64). The secondary outcomes were also unaffected by metformin treatment: all myocardial infarctions, RR = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.09); all strokes, RR = 0.76 (95% CI: 0.51 to 1.14); heart failure, RR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.59); peripheral vascular disease, RR = 0.90 (95% CI: 0.46 to 1.78); leg amputations, RR = 1.04 (95% CI: 0.44 to 2.44); and microvascular complications, RR = 0.83 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.17). For all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, there was significant heterogeneity when including the UK Prospective Diabetes Study subgroups (&lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 41% and 59%). There was significant interaction with sulphonylurea as a concomitant treatment for myocardial infarction (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.10 and 0.02, respectively).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Although metformin is considered the gold standard, its benefit/risk ratio remains uncertain. We cannot exclude a 25% reduction or a 31% increase in all-cause mortality. We cannot exclude a 33% reduction or a 64% increase in cardiovascular mortality. Further studies are needed to clarify this situation.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/MmToVpVsiCE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001204</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Characteristics and Outcomes of Initial Virologic Suppressors during Analytic Treatment Interruption in a Therapeutic HIV-1 gag Vaccine Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/9oiZoCth9eQ/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034134" title="Characteristics and Outcomes of Initial Virologic Suppressors during Analytic Treatment Interruption in a Therapeutic HIV-1 gag Vaccine Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034134&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Characteristics and Outcomes of Initial Virologic Suppressors during Analytic Treatment Interruption in a Therapeutic HIV-1 gag Vaccine Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034134&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Characteristics and Outcomes of Initial Virologic Suppressors during Analytic Treatment Interruption in a Therapeutic HIV-1 gag Vaccine Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Jonathan Z. Li et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5197 Study Team</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0034134</id>
    <updated>2012-03-30T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-30T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jonathan Z. Li, Chanson J. Brumme, Michael M. Lederman, Zabrina L. Brumme, Hongying Wang, John Spritzler, Mary Carrington, Kathleen Medvik, Bruce D. Walker, Robert T. Schooley, Daniel R. Kuritzkes, for the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5197 Study Team&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;In the placebo-controlled trial ACTG A5197, a trend favoring viral suppression was seen in the HIV-1-infected subjects who received a recombinant Ad5 HIV-1 &lt;i&gt;gag&lt;/i&gt; vaccine.&lt;/p&gt; Objective &lt;p&gt;To identify individuals with initial viral suppression (plasma HIV-1 RNA set point &lt;3.0 log&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt; copies/ml) during the analytic treatment interruption (ATI) and evaluate the durability and correlates of virologic control and characteristics of HIV sequence evolution.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;HIV-1 &lt;i&gt;gag&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;pol&lt;/i&gt; RNA were amplified and sequenced from plasma obtained during the ATI. Immune responses were measured by flow cytometric analysis and intracellular cytokine expression assays. Characteristics of those with and without initial viral suppression were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher's exact tests.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Eleven out of 104 participants (10.6%) were classified as initial virologic suppressors, nine of whom had received the vaccine. Initial virologic suppressors had significantly less CD4+ cell decline by ATI week 16 as compared to non-suppressors (median 7 CD4+ cell gain vs. 247 CD4+ cell loss, P = 0.04). However, of the ten initial virologic suppressors with a pVL at ATI week 49, only three maintained pVL &lt;3.0 log&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt; copies/ml. HIV-1 Gag-specific CD4+ interferon-γ responses were not associated with initial virologic suppression and no evidence of vaccine-driven HIV sequence evolution was detected. Participants with initial virologic suppression were found to have a lower percentage of CD4+ CTLA-4+ cells prior to treatment interruption, but a greater proportion of HIV-1 Gag-reactive CD4+ TNF-α+ cells expressing either CTLA-4 or PD-1.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Among individuals participating in a rAd5 therapeutic HIV-1 &lt;i&gt;gag&lt;/i&gt; vaccine trial, initial viral suppression was found in a subset of patients, but this response was not sustained. The association between CTLA-4 and PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells and virologic outcome warrants further study in trials of other therapeutic vaccines in development.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00080106&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/9oiZoCth9eQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0034134</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/JUjl28HVbYs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033559" title="Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033559&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033559&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs" />
    <author>
      <name>Cécile Konrat et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033559</id>
    <updated>2012-03-30T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-30T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Cécile Konrat, Isabelle Boutron, Ludovic Trinquart, Guy-Robert Auleley, Philippe Ricordeau, Philippe Ravaud&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;We aimed to determine the representation of elderly people in published reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We focused on trials of 4 medications—pioglitazone, rosuvastatin, risedronate, and valsartan—frequently used by elderly patients with chronic medical conditions.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;We selected all reports of RCTs indexed in PubMed from 1966 to April 2008 evaluating one of the 4 medications of interest. Estimates of the community-based “on-treatment” population were from a national health insurance database (SNIIR-AM) covering approximately 86% of the population in France. From this database, we evaluated data claims from January 2006 to December 2007 for 1,958,716 patients who received one of the medications of interest for more than 6 months. Of the 155 RCT reports selected, only 3 studies were exclusively of elderly patients (2 assessing valsartan; 1 risedronate). In only 4 of 37 reports (10.8%) for pioglitazone, 4 of 22 (18.2%) for risedronate, 3 of 29 (10.3%) for rosuvastatine and 9 of 67 (13.4%) for valsartan, the proportion of patients aged 65 or older was within or above that treated in clinical practice. In 62.2% of the reports for pioglitazone, 40.9% for risedronate, 37.9% for rosuvastatine, and 70.2% for valsartan, the proportion of patients aged 65 or older was lower than half that in the treated population. The representation of elderly people did not differ by publication date or sample size.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Elderly patients are poorly represented in RCTs of drugs they are likely to receive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/JUjl28HVbYs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033559</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Comparison of Bone and Renal Effects In HIV-infected Adults Switching to Abacavir or Tenofovir Based Therapy in a Randomized Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/lJMcjisCw90/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032445" title="Comparison of Bone and Renal Effects In HIV-infected Adults Switching to Abacavir or Tenofovir Based Therapy in a Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032445&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Comparison of Bone and Renal Effects In HIV-infected Adults Switching to Abacavir or Tenofovir Based Therapy in a Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032445&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Comparison of Bone and Renal Effects In HIV-infected Adults Switching to Abacavir or Tenofovir Based Therapy in a Randomized Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Thomas A. Rasmussen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032445</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-29T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Thomas A. Rasmussen, Danny Jensen, Martin Tolstrup, Ulla S. Nielsen, Erland J. Erlandsen, Henrik Birn, Lars Østergaard, Bente L. Langdahl, Alex L. Laursen&lt;/p&gt;
Introduction &lt;p&gt;Our objective was to compare the bone and renal effects among HIV-infected patients randomized to abacavir or tenofovir-based combination anti-retroviral therapy.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;In an open-label randomized trial, HIV-infected patients were randomized to switch from zidovudine/lamivudine (AZT/3TC) to abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC). We measured bone mass density (BMD) and bone turnover biomarkers (osteocalcin, osteocalcin, procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), alkaline phosphatase, type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTx), and osteoprotegerin). We assessed renal function by estimated creatinine clearance, plasma cystatin C, and urinary levels of creatinine, albumin, cystatin C, and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). The changes from baseline in BMD and renal and bone biomarkers were compared across study arms.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Of 40 included patients, 35 completed 48 weeks of randomized therapy and follow up. BMD was measured in 33, 26, and 27 patients at baseline, week 24, and week 48, respectively. In TDF/FTC-treated patients we observed significant reductions from baseline in hip and lumbar spine BMD at week 24 (−1.8% and −2.5%) and week 48 (−2.1% and −2.1%), whereas BMD was stable in patients in the ABC/3TC arm. The changes from baseline in BMD were significantly different between study arms. All bone turnover biomarkers except osteoprotegerin increased in the TDF/FTC arm compared with the ABC/3TC arm, but early changes did not predict subsequent loss of BMD. Renal function parameters were similar between study arms although a small increase in NGAL was detected among TDF-treated patients.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;Switching to TDF/FTC-based therapy led to decreases in BMD and increases in bone turnover markers compared with ABC/3TC-based treatment. No major difference in renal function was observed.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00647244&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/lJMcjisCw90" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032445</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Efficacy of an Educational Material on Second Primary Cancer Screening Practice for Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/GWAAzA0q_y4/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033238" title="Efficacy of an Educational Material on Second Primary Cancer Screening Practice for Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033238&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Efficacy of an Educational Material on Second Primary Cancer Screening Practice for Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033238&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Efficacy of an Educational Material on Second Primary Cancer Screening Practice for Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Dong Wook Shin et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033238</id>
    <updated>2012-03-29T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-29T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Dong Wook Shin, Juhee Cho, Young Woo Kim, Jae Hwan Oh, Seok Won Kim, Ki-Wook Chung, Woo-Yong Lee, Jeong Eon Lee, Eliseo Guallar, Won-Chul Lee&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Cancer surivors have limited knowledge about second primary cancer (SPC) screening and suboptimal rates of completion of screening practices for SPC. Our objective was to test the efficacy of an educational material on the knowledge, attitudes, and screening practices for SPC among cancer survivors.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;Randomized, controlled trial among 326 cancer survivors from 6 oncology care outpatient clinics in Korea. Patients were randomized to an intervention or an attention control group. The intervention was a photo-novel, culturally tailored to increase knowledge about SPC screening. Knowledge and attitudes regarding SPC screening were assessed two weeks after the intervention, and screening practices were assessed after one year.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;At two weeks post-intervention, the average knowledge score was significantly higher in the intervention compared to the control group (0.81 vs. 0.75, P&lt;0.01), with no significant difference in their attitude scores (2.64 vs. 2.57, P = 0.18). After 1 year of follow-up, the completion rate of all appropriate cancer screening was 47.2% in both intervention and control groups.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;While the educatinal material was effective for increasing knowledge of SPC screening, it did not promote cancer screening practice among cancer survivors. More effective interventions are needed to increase SPC screening rates in this population.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00948337&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/GWAAzA0q_y4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033238</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statins but Not Aspirin Reduce Thrombotic Risk Assessed by Thrombin Generation in Diabetic Patients without Cardiovascular Events: The RATIONAL Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/4vqNkMIen8Q/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032894" title="Statins but Not Aspirin Reduce Thrombotic Risk Assessed by Thrombin Generation in Diabetic Patients without Cardiovascular Events: The RATIONAL Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032894&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Statins but Not Aspirin Reduce Thrombotic Risk Assessed by Thrombin Generation in Diabetic Patients without Cardiovascular Events: The RATIONAL Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032894&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Statins but Not Aspirin Reduce Thrombotic Risk Assessed by Thrombin Generation in Diabetic Patients without Cardiovascular Events: The RATIONAL Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Alejandro Macchia et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032894</id>
    <updated>2012-03-28T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-28T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Alejandro Macchia, Nicolás Laffaye, Pablo D. Comignani, Elena Cornejo Pucci, Cecilia Igarzabal, Alejandra S. Scazziota, Lourdes Herrera, Javier A. Mariani, Julio C. Bragagnolo, Hugo Catalano, Gianni Tognoni, Antonio Nicolucci&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The systematic use of aspirin and statins in patients with diabetes and no previous cardiovascular events is controversial. We sought to assess the effects of aspirin and statins on the thrombotic risk assessed by thrombin generation (TG) among patients with type II diabetes mellitus and no previous cardiovascular events.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;Prospective, randomized, open, blinded to events evaluation, controlled, 2×2 factorial clinical trial including 30 patients randomly allocated to aspirin 100 mg/d, atorvastatin 40 mg/d, both or none. Outcome measurements included changes in TG levels after treatment (8 to 10 weeks), assessed by a calibrated automated thrombogram. At baseline all groups had similar clinical and biochemical profiles, including TG levels. There was no interaction between aspirin and atorvastatin. Atorvastatin significantly reduced TG measured as peak TG with saline (85.09±55.34 nmol vs 153.26±75.55 nmol for atorvastatin and control groups, respectively; p = 0.018). On the other hand, aspirin had no effect on TG (121.51±81.83 nmol vs 116.85±67.66 nmol, for aspirin and control groups, respectively; p = 0.716). The effects of treatments on measurements of TG using other agonists were consistent.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;While waiting for data from ongoing large clinical randomized trials to definitively outline the role of aspirin in primary prevention, our study shows that among diabetic patients without previous vascular events, statins but not aspirin reduce thrombotic risk assessed by TG.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00793754&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/4vqNkMIen8Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032894</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Efficacy of a High-Dose in Addition to Daily Low-Dose Vitamin A in Children Suffering from Severe Acute Malnutrition with Other Illnesses</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/IXteTC0D3BY/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033112" title="Efficacy of a High-Dose in Addition to Daily Low-Dose Vitamin A in Children Suffering from Severe Acute Malnutrition with Other Illnesses" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033112&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Efficacy of a High-Dose in Addition to Daily Low-Dose Vitamin A in Children Suffering from Severe Acute Malnutrition with Other Illnesses" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033112&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Efficacy of a High-Dose in Addition to Daily Low-Dose Vitamin A in Children Suffering from Severe Acute Malnutrition with Other Illnesses" />
    <author>
      <name>Samima Sattar et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033112</id>
    <updated>2012-03-27T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-27T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Samima Sattar, Tahmeed Ahmed, Choudhury Habibur Rasul, Debasish Saha, Mohammed Abdus Salam, Md Iqbal Hossain&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Efficacy of high-dose vitamin A (VA) in children suffering from severe acute malnutrition (SAM) has recently been questioned. This study compared the efficacy of a single high-dose (200,000 IU) in addition to daily low-dose (5000 IU) VA in the management of children suffering from SAM with diarrhea and/or acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRI).&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;In a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial in icddr,b, Bangladesh during 2005–07, children aged 6–59 months with weight-for-height &lt;−3 Z-score and/or bipedal edema (SAM) received either a high-dose VA or placebo on admission day. Both the groups received 5,000 IU/day VA in a multivitamins drop for 15 days and other standard treatment which is similar to WHO guidelines.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;A total 260 children (130 in each group) were enrolled. All had diarrhea, 54% had concomitant ALRI, 50% had edema, 48.5% were girl with a mean±SD age of 16±10 months. None had clinical signs of VA deficiency. Mean±SD baseline serum retinol was 13.15±9.28 µg/dl, retinol binding protein was 1.27±0.95 mg/dl, and pre-albumin was 7.97±3.96 mg/dl. Median (inter quartile range) of C-reactive protein was 7.8 (2.1, 22.2) mg/L. Children of the two groups did not differ in any baseline characteristic. Over the 15 days treatment period resolution of diarrhea, ALRI, edema, anthropometric changes, and biochemical indicators of VA were similar between the groups. The high-dose VA supplementation in children with SAM did not show any adverse event.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Efficacy of daily low-dose VA compared to an additional single high-dose was not observed to be better in the management of children suffering from SAM with other acute illnesses. A single high-dose VA may be given especially where the children with SAM may leave the hospital/treatment center early.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00388921&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/IXteTC0D3BY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033112</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Papua New Guinean Infants Exposed to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/ocC94qKqMlk/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001195" title="Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Papua New Guinean Infants Exposed to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001195&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Papua New Guinean Infants Exposed to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001195&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Papua New Guinean Infants Exposed to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Nicolas Senn et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001195</id>
    <updated>2012-03-27T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-27T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Nicolas Senn, Patricia Rarau, Danielle I. Stanisic, Leanne Robinson, Céline Barnadas, Doris Manong, Mary Salib, Jonah Iga, Nandao Tarongka, Serej Ley, Anna Rosanas-Urgell, John J. Aponte, Peter A. Zimmerman, James G. Beeson, Louis Schofield, Peter Siba, Stephen J. Rogerson, John C. Reeder, Ivo Mueller&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) has been shown in randomized trials to reduce malaria-related morbidity in African infants living in areas of high &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium falciparum (Pf)&lt;/i&gt; transmission. It remains unclear whether IPTi is an appropriate prevention strategy in non-African settings or those co-endemic for &lt;i&gt;P. vivax (Pv)&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;In this study, 1,121 Papua New Guinean infants were enrolled into a three-arm placebo-controlled randomized trial and assigned to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) (25 mg/kg and 1.25 mg/kg) plus amodiaquine (AQ) (10 mg/kg, 3 d, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 374), SP plus artesunate (AS) (4 mg/kg, 3 d, &lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 374), or placebo (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 373), given at 3, 6, 9 and 12 mo. Both participants and study teams were blinded to treatment allocation. The primary end point was protective efficacy (PE) against all episodes of clinical malaria from 3 to 15 mo of age. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. The PE (compared to placebo) against clinical malaria episodes (caused by all species) was 29% (95% CI, 10–43, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;≤0.001) in children receiving SP-AQ and 12% (95% CI, −11 to 30, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.12) in those receiving SP-AS. Efficacy was higher against &lt;i&gt;Pf&lt;/i&gt; than &lt;i&gt;Pv&lt;/i&gt;. In the SP-AQ group, &lt;i&gt;Pf&lt;/i&gt; incidence was 35% (95% CI, 9–54, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.012) and &lt;i&gt;Pv&lt;/i&gt; incidence was 23% (95% CI, 0–41, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.048) lower than in the placebo group. IPTi with SP-AS protected only against &lt;i&gt;Pf&lt;/i&gt; episodes (PE = 31%, 95% CI, 4–51, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.027), not against &lt;i&gt;Pv&lt;/i&gt; episodes (PE = 6%, 95% CI, −24 to 26, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.759). Number of observed adverse events/serious adverse events did not differ between treatment arms (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&gt;0.55). None of the serious adverse events were thought to be treatment-related, and the vomiting rate was low in both treatment groups (1.4%–2.0%). No rebound in malaria morbidity was observed for 6 mo following the intervention.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;IPTi using a long half-life drug combination is efficacious for the prevention of malaria and anemia in infants living in a region highly endemic for both &lt;i&gt;Pf&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Pv&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00285662&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/ocC94qKqMlk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001195</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>No Treatment versus 24 or 60 Weeks of Antiretroviral Treatment during Primary HIV Infection: The Randomized Primo-SHM Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/F3opi3ekaUs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001196" title="No Treatment versus 24 or 60 Weeks of Antiretroviral Treatment during Primary HIV Infection: The Randomized Primo-SHM Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001196&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) No Treatment versus 24 or 60 Weeks of Antiretroviral Treatment during Primary HIV Infection: The Randomized Primo-SHM Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001196&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) No Treatment versus 24 or 60 Weeks of Antiretroviral Treatment during Primary HIV Infection: The Randomized Primo-SHM Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Marlous L. Grijsen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>on behalf of the Primo-SHM Study Group</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001196</id>
    <updated>2012-03-27T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-27T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Marlous L. Grijsen, Radjin Steingrover, Ferdinand W. N. M. Wit, Suzanne Jurriaans, Annelies Verbon, Kees Brinkman, Marchina E. van der Ende, Robin Soetekouw, Frank de Wolf, Joep M. A. Lange, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Jan M. Prins, on behalf of the Primo-SHM Study Group&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The objective of this study was to assess the benefit of temporary combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) during primary HIV infection (PHI).&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;Adult patients with laboratory evidence of PHI were recruited in 13 HIV treatment centers in the Netherlands and randomly assigned to receive no treatment or 24 or 60 wk of cART (allocation in a 1∶1∶1 ratio); if therapy was clinically indicated, participants were randomized over the two treatment arms (allocation in a 1∶1 ratio). Primary end points were (1) viral set point, defined as the plasma viral load 36 wk after randomization in the no treatment arm and 36 wk after treatment interruption in the treatment arms, and (2) the total time that patients were off therapy, defined as the time between randomization and start of cART in the no treatment arm, and the time between treatment interruption and restart of cART in the treatment arms. cART was (re)started in case of confirmed CD4 cell count &lt;350 cells/mm&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt; or symptomatic HIV disease. In total, 173 participants were randomized. The modified intention-to-treat analysis comprised 168 patients: 115 were randomized over the three study arms, and 53 randomized over the two treatment arms. Of the 115 patients randomized over the three study arms, mean viral set point was 4.8 (standard deviation 0.6) log&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt; copies/ml in the no treatment arm, and 4.0 (1.0) and 4.3 (0.9) log&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt; copies/ml in the 24- and 60-wk treatment arms (between groups: &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). The median total time off therapy in the no treatment arm was 0.7 (95% CI 0.0–1.8) y compared to 3.0 (1.9–4.2) and 1.8 (0.5–3.0) y in the 24- and 60-wk treatment arms (log rank test, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001). In the adjusted Cox analysis, both 24 wk (hazard ratio 0.42 [95% CI 0.25–0.73]) and 60 wk of early treatment (hazard ratio 0.55 [0.32–0.95]) were associated with time to (re)start of cART.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;In this trial, temporary cART during PHI was found to transiently lower the viral set point and defer the restart of cART during chronic HIV infection.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN59497461&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/F3opi3ekaUs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001196</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/hUMYKGvRfIA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001189" title="Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001189&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001189&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Publication Bias in Antipsychotic Trials: An Analysis of Efficacy Comparing the Published Literature to the US Food and Drug Administration Database" />
    <author>
      <name>Erick H. Turner et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001189</id>
    <updated>2012-03-20T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-20T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Erick H. Turner, Daniel Knoepflmacher, Lee Shapley&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Publication bias compromises the validity of evidence-based medicine, yet a growing body of research shows that this problem is widespread. Efficacy data from drug regulatory agencies, e.g., the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), can serve as a benchmark or control against which data in journal articles can be checked. Thus one may determine whether publication bias is present and quantify the extent to which it inflates apparent drug efficacy.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;FDA Drug Approval Packages for eight second-generation antipsychotics—aripiprazole, iloperidone, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, risperidone long-acting injection (risperidone LAI), and ziprasidone—were used to identify a cohort of 24 FDA-registered premarketing trials. The results of these trials according to the FDA were compared with the results conveyed in corresponding journal articles. The relationship between study outcome and publication status was examined, and effect sizes derived from the two data sources were compared. Among the 24 FDA-registered trials, four (17%) were unpublished. Of these, three failed to show that the study drug had a statistical advantage over placebo, and one showed the study drug was statistically inferior to the active comparator. Among the 20 published trials, the five that were not positive, according to the FDA, showed some evidence of outcome reporting bias. However, the association between trial outcome and publication status did not reach statistical significance. Further, the apparent increase in the effect size point estimate due to publication bias was modest (8%) and not statistically significant. On the other hand, the effect size for unpublished trials (0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.39) was less than half that for the published trials (0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.54), a difference that was significant.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;The magnitude of publication bias found for antipsychotics was less than that found previously for antidepressants, possibly because antipsychotics demonstrate superiority to placebo more consistently. Without increased access to regulatory agency data, publication bias will continue to blur distinctions between effective and ineffective drugs.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/hUMYKGvRfIA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001189</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cost-Effectiveness of Peer-Delivered Interventions for Cocaine and Alcohol Abuse among Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/5cQFEG9drKQ/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033594" title="Cost-Effectiveness of Peer-Delivered Interventions for Cocaine and Alcohol Abuse among Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033594&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Cost-Effectiveness of Peer-Delivered Interventions for Cocaine and Alcohol Abuse among Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033594&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Cost-Effectiveness of Peer-Delivered Interventions for Cocaine and Alcohol Abuse among Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Jennifer Prah Ruger et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033594</id>
    <updated>2012-03-20T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-20T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jennifer Prah Ruger, Arbi Ben Abdallah, Craig Luekens, Linda Cottler&lt;/p&gt;
Aims &lt;p&gt;To determine whether the additional interventions to standard care are cost-effective in addressing cocaine and alcohol abuse at 4 months (4 M) and 12 months (12 M) from baseline.&lt;/p&gt; Method &lt;p&gt;We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial with three arms: (1) NIDA's Standard intervention (SI); (2) SI plus a Well Woman Exam (WWE); and, (3) SI, WWE, plus four Educational Sessions (4ES).&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;To obtain an additional cocaine abstainer, WWE compared to SI cost $7,223 at 4 M and $3,611 at 12 M. Per additional alcohol abstainer, WWE compared to SI cost $3,611 and $7,223 at 4 M and 12 M, respectively. At 12 M, 4ES was dominated (more costly and less effective) by WWE for abstinence outcomes.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;To our knowledge, this is the first cost-effectiveness analysis simultaneously examining cocaine and alcohol abuse in women. Depending on primary outcomes sought and priorities of policy makers, peer-delivered interventions can be a cost-effective way to address the needs of this growing, underserved population.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01235091&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/5cQFEG9drKQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033594</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Improved Preservation of Residual Beta Cell Function by Atorvastatin in Patients with Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes and High CRP Levels (DIATOR Trial)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/i9gVNQpQ2Ik/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033108" title="Improved Preservation of Residual Beta Cell Function by Atorvastatin in Patients with Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes and High CRP Levels (DIATOR Trial)" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033108&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Improved Preservation of Residual Beta Cell Function by Atorvastatin in Patients with Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes and High CRP Levels (DIATOR Trial)" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033108&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Improved Preservation of Residual Beta Cell Function by Atorvastatin in Patients with Recent Onset Type 1 Diabetes and High CRP Levels (DIATOR Trial)" />
    <author>
      <name>Alexander Strom et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>on behalf of the DIATOR Study Group</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033108</id>
    <updated>2012-03-20T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-20T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Alexander Strom, Hubert Kolb, Stephan Martin, Christian Herder, Marie-Christine Simon, Wolfgang Koenig, Tim Heise, Lutz Heinemann, Michael Roden, Nanette C. Schloot, on behalf of the DIATOR Study Group&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;A recent randomized placebo-controlled trial of the effect of atorvastatin treatment on the progression of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes suggested a slower decline of residual beta cell function with statin treatment. Aim of this secondary analysis was to identify patient subgroups which differ in the decline of beta cell function during treatment with atorvastatin.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;The randomized placebo-controlled Diabetes and Atorvastatin (DIATOR) Trial included 89 patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes and detectable islet autoantibodies (mean age 30 years, 40% females), in 12 centers in Germany. Patients received placebo or 80 mg/d atorvastatin for 18 months. As primary outcome stimulated serum C-peptide levels were determined 90 min after a standardized liquid mixed meal. For this secondary analysis patients were stratified by single baseline characteristics which were considered to possibly be modified by atorvastatin treatment. Subgroups defined by age, sex or by baseline metabolic parameters like body mass index (BMI), total serum cholesterol or fasting C-peptide did not differ in C-peptide outcome after atorvastatin treatment. However, the subgroup defined by high (above median) baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations exhibited higher stimulated C-peptide secretion after statin treatment (p = 0.044). Individual baseline CRP levels correlated with C-peptide outcome in the statin group (r&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.3079, p&lt;0.004). The subgroup with baseline CRP concentrations above median differed from the corresponding subgroup with lower CRP levels by higher median values of BMI, IL-6, IL-1RA, sICAM-1 and E-selectin.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;Atorvastatin treatment may be effective in slowing the decline of beta cell function in a patient subgroup defined by above median levels of CRP and other inflammation associated immune mediators.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00974740&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/i9gVNQpQ2Ik" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033108</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Effects of Centralised and Specialised Intervention in the Early Course of Severe Unipolar Depressive Disorder: A Randomised Clinical Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/ZvXf4P_HICM/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032950" title="The Effects of Centralised and Specialised Intervention in the Early Course of Severe Unipolar Depressive Disorder: A Randomised Clinical Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032950&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The Effects of Centralised and Specialised Intervention in the Early Course of Severe Unipolar Depressive Disorder: A Randomised Clinical Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032950&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The Effects of Centralised and Specialised Intervention in the Early Course of Severe Unipolar Depressive Disorder: A Randomised Clinical Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Hanne Vibe Hansen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>the Early Intervention Affective Disorders (EIA) Trial Group</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032950</id>
    <updated>2012-03-19T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-19T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Hanne Vibe Hansen, Ellen Margrethe Christensen, Henrik Dam, Christian Gluud, Jørn Wetterslev, Lars Vedel Kessing, the Early Intervention Affective Disorders (EIA) Trial Group&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Little is known on whether centralised and specialised combined pharmacological and psychological intervention in the early phase of severe unipolar depression improve prognosis. The aim of the present study was to assess the benefits and harms of centralised and specialised secondary care intervention in the early course of severe unipolar depression.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;A randomised multicentre trial with central randomisation and blinding in relation to the primary outcome comparing a centralised and specialised outpatient intervention program with standard decentralised psychiatric treatment. The interventions were offered at discharge from first, second, or third hospitalisation due to a single depressive episode or recurrent depressive disorder. The primary outcome was time to readmission to psychiatric hospital. The data on re-hospitalisation was obtained from the Danish Psychiatric Central Register. The secondary and tertiary outcomes were severity of depressive symptoms according to the Major Depression Inventory, adherence to medical treatment, and satisfaction with treatment according to the total score on the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-Affective Disorder (VSSS-A). These outcomes were assessed using questionnaires one year after discharge from hospital.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;A total of 268 patients with unipolar depression were included. There was no significant difference in the time to readmission (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 1.32; log rank: χ&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.3, d.f. = 1, p = 0.6); severity of depressive symptoms (mood disorder clinic: median 21.6, quartiles 9.7–31.2 versus standard treatment: median 20.2, quartiles 10.0–29.8; p = 0.7); or the prevalence of patients in antidepressant treatment (73.9% versus 80.0%, p = 0.2). Centralised and specialised secondary care intervention resulted in significantly higher satisfaction with treatment (131 (SD 31.8) versus 107 (SD 25.6); p&lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Centralised and specialised secondary care intervention in the early course of severe unipolar depression resulted in no significant effects on time to rehospitalisation, severity of symptoms, or use of antidepressants, but increased patient satisfaction.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00253071&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/ZvXf4P_HICM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032950</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Database for Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) and Subsequent Regrouping by Clinical Specialty</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/KUKIt-xE4jU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033677" title="The Database for Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) and Subsequent Regrouping by Clinical Specialty" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033677&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The Database for Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) and Subsequent Regrouping by Clinical Specialty" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033677&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The Database for Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) and Subsequent Regrouping by Clinical Specialty" />
    <author>
      <name>Asba Tasneem et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0033677</id>
    <updated>2012-03-16T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-16T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Asba Tasneem, Laura Aberle, Hari Ananth, Swati Chakraborty, Karen Chiswell, Brian J. McCourt, Ricardo Pietrobon&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The ClinicalTrials.gov registry provides information regarding characteristics of past, current, and planned clinical studies to patients, clinicians, and researchers; in addition, registry data are available for bulk download. However, issues related to data structure, nomenclature, and changes in data collection over time present challenges to the aggregate analysis and interpretation of these data in general and to the analysis of trials according to clinical specialty in particular. Improving usability of these data could enhance the utility of ClinicalTrials.gov as a research resource.&lt;/p&gt; Methods/Principal Results &lt;p&gt;The purpose of our project was twofold. First, we sought to extend the usability of ClinicalTrials.gov for research purposes by developing a database for aggregate analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov (AACT) that contains data from the 96,346 clinical trials registered as of September 27, 2010. Second, we developed and validated a methodology for annotating studies by clinical specialty, using a custom taxonomy employing Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms applied by an NLM algorithm, as well as MeSH terms and other disease condition terms provided by study sponsors. Clinical specialists reviewed and annotated MeSH and non-MeSH disease condition terms, and an algorithm was created to classify studies into clinical specialties based on both MeSH and non-MeSH annotations. False positives and false negatives were evaluated by comparing algorithmic classification with manual classification for three specialties.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;The resulting AACT database features study design attributes parsed into discrete fields, integrated metadata, and an integrated MeSH thesaurus, and is available for download as Oracle extracts (.dmp file and text format). This publicly-accessible dataset will facilitate analysis of studies and permit detailed characterization and analysis of the U.S. clinical trials enterprise as a whole. In addition, the methodology we present for creating specialty datasets may facilitate other efforts to analyze studies by specialty groups.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/KUKIt-xE4jU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0033677</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Planned Vaginal Birth or Elective Repeat Caesarean: Patient Preference Restricted Cohort with Nested Randomised Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/odJh8rhl4BE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001192" title="Planned Vaginal Birth or Elective Repeat Caesarean: Patient Preference Restricted Cohort with Nested Randomised Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001192&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Planned Vaginal Birth or Elective Repeat Caesarean: Patient Preference Restricted Cohort with Nested Randomised Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001192&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Planned Vaginal Birth or Elective Repeat Caesarean: Patient Preference Restricted Cohort with Nested Randomised Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Caroline A. Crowther et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>on behalf of the Birth After Caesarean Study Group</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001192</id>
    <updated>2012-03-13T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-13T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Caroline A. Crowther, Jodie M. Dodd, Janet E. Hiller, Ross R. Haslam, Jeffrey S. Robinson, on behalf of the Birth After Caesarean Study Group&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Uncertainty exists about benefits and harms of a planned vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) compared with elective repeat caesarean (ERC). We conducted a prospective restricted cohort study consisting of a patient preference cohort study, and a small nested randomised trial to compare benefits and risks of a planned ERC with planned VBAC.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and findings &lt;p&gt;2,345 women with one prior caesarean, eligible for VBAC at term, were recruited from 14 Australian maternity hospitals. Women were assigned by patient preference (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 2,323) or randomisation (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 22) to planned VBAC (1,225 patient preference, 12 randomised) or planned ERC (1,098 patient preference, ten randomised). The primary outcome was risk of fetal death or death of liveborn infant before discharge or serious infant outcome. Data were analysed for the 2,345 women (100%) and infants enrolled.The risk of fetal death or liveborn infant death prior to discharge or serious infant outcome was significantly lower for infants born in the planned ERC group compared with infants in the planned VBAC group (0.9% versus 2.4%; relative risk [RR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.19–0.80; number needed to treat to benefit 66; 95% CI 40–200). Fewer women in the planned ERC group compared with women in the planned VBAC had a major haemorrhage (blood loss ≥1,500 ml and/or blood transfusion), (0.8% [9/1,108] versus 2.3% [29/1,237]; RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17–0.80).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Among women with one prior caesarean, planned ERC compared with planned VBAC was associated with a lower risk of fetal and infant death or serious infant outcome. The risk of major maternal haemorrhage was reduced with no increase in maternal or perinatal complications to time of hospital discharge. Women, clinicians, and policy makers can use this information to develop health advice and make decisions about care for women who have had a previous caesarean.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN53974531&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/odJh8rhl4BE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001192</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Safety, Effectiveness and Concentrations of Adjusted Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Adults on Rifampicin-Based Antitubercular Therapy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/qKm84Y2gZPk/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032173" title="The Safety, Effectiveness and Concentrations of Adjusted Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Adults on Rifampicin-Based Antitubercular Therapy" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032173&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The Safety, Effectiveness and Concentrations of Adjusted Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Adults on Rifampicin-Based Antitubercular Therapy" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032173&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The Safety, Effectiveness and Concentrations of Adjusted Lopinavir/Ritonavir in HIV-Infected Adults on Rifampicin-Based Antitubercular Therapy" />
    <author>
      <name>Eric H. Decloedt et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032173</id>
    <updated>2012-03-07T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-07T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Eric H. Decloedt, Gary Maartens, Peter Smith, Concepta Merry, Funeka Bango, Helen McIlleron&lt;/p&gt;
Objective &lt;p&gt;Rifampicin co-administration dramatically reduces plasma lopinavir concentrations. Studies in healthy volunteers and HIV-infected patients showed that doubling the dose of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) or adding additional ritonavir offsets this interaction. However, high rates of hepatotoxicity were observed in healthy volunteers. We evaluated the safety, effectiveness and pre-dose concentrations of adjusted doses of LPV/r in HIV infected adults treated with rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;Adult patients on a LPV/r-based antiretroviral regimen and rifampicin-based tuberculosis therapy were enrolled. Doubled doses of LPV/r or an additional 300 mg of ritonavir were used to overcome the inducing effect of rifampicin. Steady-state lopinavir pre-dose concentrations were evaluated every second month.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;18 patients were enrolled with a total of 79 patient months of observation. 11/18 patients were followed up until tuberculosis treatment completion. During tuberculosis treatment, the median (IQR) pre-dose lopinavir concentration was 6.8 (1.1–9.2) mg/L and 36/47 (77%) were above the recommended trough concentration of 1 mg/L. Treatment was generally well tolerated with no grade 3 or 4 toxicity: 8 patients developed grade 1 or 2 transaminase elevation, 1 patient defaulted additional ritonavir due to nausea and 1 patient developed diarrhea requiring dose reduction. Viral loads after tuberculosis treatment were available for 11 patients and 10 were undetectable.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;Once established on treatment, adjusted doses of LPV/r co-administered with rifampicin-based tuberculosis treatment were tolerated and LPV pre-dose concentrations were adequate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/qKm84Y2gZPk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032173</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Role of Age and Exposure to Plasmodium falciparum in the Rate of Acquisition of Naturally Acquired Immunity: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/jYCFAGQGt44/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032362" title="The Role of Age and Exposure to Plasmodium falciparum in the Rate of Acquisition of Naturally Acquired Immunity: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032362&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The Role of Age and Exposure to Plasmodium falciparum in the Rate of Acquisition of Naturally Acquired Immunity: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032362&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The Role of Age and Exposure to Plasmodium falciparum in the Rate of Acquisition of Naturally Acquired Immunity: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Caterina Guinovart et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032362</id>
    <updated>2012-03-07T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-07T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Caterina Guinovart, Carlota Dobaño, Quique Bassat, Augusto Nhabomba, Llorenç Quintó, Maria Nélia Manaca, Ruth Aguilar, Mauricio H. Rodríguez, Arnoldo Barbosa, John J. Aponte, Alfredo G. Mayor, Montse Renom, Cinta Moraleda, David J. Roberts, Evelin Schwarzer, Peter N. Le Souëf, Louis Schofield, Chetan E. Chitnis, Denise L. Doolan, Pedro L. Alonso&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The rate of acquisition of naturally acquired immunity (NAI) against malaria predominantly depends on transmission intensity and age, although disentangling the effects of these is difficult. We used chemoprophylaxis to selectively control exposure to &lt;i&gt;P. falciparum&lt;/i&gt; during different periods in infancy and explore the effect of age in the build-up of NAI, measured as risk of clinical malaria.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;A three-arm double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 349 infants born to Mozambican HIV-negative women. The late exposure group (LEG) received monthly Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine (SP) plus Artesunate (AS) from 2.5–4.5 months of age and monthly placebo from 5.5–9.5 months; the early exposure group (EEG) received placebo from 2.5–4.5 months and SP+AS from 5.5–9.5 months; and the control group (CG) received placebo from 2.5–9.5 months. Active and passive case detection (PCD) were conducted from birth to 10.5 and 24 months respectively. The primary endpoint was time to first or only episode of malaria in the second year detected by PCD. The incidence of malaria during the second year was of 0.50, 0.51 and 0.35 episodes/PYAR in the LEG, EEG and CG respectively (p = 0.379 for the adjusted comparison of the 3 groups). The hazard ratio of the adjusted comparison between the LEG and the CG was 1.38 (0.83–2.28, p = 0.642) and that between the EEG and the CG was 1.35 (0.81–2.24, p = 0.743).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;After considerably interfering with exposure during the first year of life, there was a trend towards a higher risk of malaria in the second year in children who had received chemoprophylaxis, but there was no significant rebound. No evidence was found that the age of first exposure to malaria affects the rate of acquisition of NAI. Thus, the timing of administration of antimalarial interventions like malaria vaccines during infancy does not appear to be a critical determinant.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00231452&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/jYCFAGQGt44" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032362</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Adverse Drug Reactions in Children—A Systematic Review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/WKVA0tIx5NA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024061" title="Adverse Drug Reactions in Children—A Systematic Review" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024061&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Adverse Drug Reactions in Children—A Systematic Review" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024061&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Adverse Drug Reactions in Children—A Systematic Review" />
    <author>
      <name>Rebecca Mary Diane Smyth et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024061</id>
    <updated>2012-03-05T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-05T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Rebecca Mary Diane Smyth, Elizabeth Gargon, Jamie Kirkham, Lynne Cresswell, Su Golder, Rosalind Smyth, Paula Williamson&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Adverse drug reactions in children are an important public health problem. We have undertaken a systematic review of observational studies in children in three settings: causing admission to hospital, occurring during hospital stay and occurring in the community. We were particularly interested in understanding how ADRs might be better detected, assessed and avoided.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;We searched nineteen electronic databases using a comprehensive search strategy. In total, 102 studies were included. The primary outcome was any clinical event described as an adverse drug reaction to one or more drugs. Additional information relating to the ADR was collected: associated drug classification; clinical presentation; associated risk factors; methods used for assessing causality, severity, and avoidability. Seventy one percent (72/102) of studies assessed causality, and thirty four percent (34/102) performed a severity assessment. Only nineteen studies (19%) assessed avoidability. Incidence rates for ADRs causing hospital admission ranged from 0.4% to 10.3% of all children (pooled estimate of 2.9% (2.6%, 3.1%)) and from 0.6% to 16.8% of all children exposed to a drug during hospital stay. Anti-infectives and anti-epileptics were the most frequently reported therapeutic class associated with ADRs in children admitted to hospital (17 studies; 12 studies respectively) and children in hospital (24 studies; 14 studies respectively), while anti-infectives and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were frequently reported as associated with ADRs in outpatient children (13 studies; 6 studies respectively). Fourteen studies reported rates ranging from 7%–98% of ADRs being either definitely/possibly avoidable.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;There is extensive literature which investigates ADRs in children. Although these studies provide estimates of incidence in different settings and some indication of the therapeutic classes most frequently associated with ADRs, further work is needed to address how such ADRs may be prevented.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/WKVA0tIx5NA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024061</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effectiveness of YouRAction, an Intervention to Promote Adolescent Physical Activity Using Personal and Environmental Feedback: A Cluster RCT</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/qvzGuGE75Ss/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032682" title="Effectiveness of YouRAction, an Intervention to Promote Adolescent Physical Activity Using Personal and Environmental Feedback: A Cluster RCT" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032682&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Effectiveness of YouRAction, an Intervention to Promote Adolescent Physical Activity Using Personal and Environmental Feedback: A Cluster RCT" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032682&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Effectiveness of YouRAction, an Intervention to Promote Adolescent Physical Activity Using Personal and Environmental Feedback: A Cluster RCT" />
    <author>
      <name>Richard Geuchien Prins et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032682</id>
    <updated>2012-03-05T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-05T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Richard Geuchien Prins, Johannes Brug, Pepijn van Empelen, Anke Oenema&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;In this study the one and six months effects of the computer-tailored YouRAction (targeting individual level determinants) and YouRAction+e (targeting in addition perceived environmental determinants) on compliance with the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) guideline and weight status are examined. In addition the use and appreciation of both interventions are studied.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;A three-armed cluster randomized trial was conducted in 2009–2010 with measurements at baseline, one and six months post intervention. School classes were assigned to one of the study arms (YouRaction, YouRAction+e and Generic Information (GI) control group). MVPA was derived from self-reports at baseline, one and six months post intervention. Body Mass Index and waist circumference were measured at baseline and six months post intervention in a random sub-sample of the population. Use of the interventions was measured by webserver logs and appreciation by self-reports. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted to study the effects of the intervention against the GI control group. ANOVA's and chi-square tests were used to describe differences in use and appreciation between study arms.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;There were no statistically significant intervention effects on compliance with the MVPA guideline, overweight or WC. Access to the full intervention was significantly lower for YouRAction (24.0%) and YouRAction+e (21.7%) compared to the GI (54.4%).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;This study could not demonstrate that the YouRAction and YouRAction+e interventions were effective in promoting MVPA or improve anthropometric outcomes among adolescents, compared to generic information. Insufficient use and exposure to the intervention content may be an explanation for the lack of effects.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;TrialRegister.nl NTR1923&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/qvzGuGE75Ss" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032682</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Strengths and Weaknesses of Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/wIqW5xoVYgg/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032695" title="Strengths and Weaknesses of Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032695&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Strengths and Weaknesses of Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032695&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Strengths and Weaknesses of Immunotherapy for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 12 Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Juan Wang et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0032695</id>
    <updated>2012-03-05T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-03-05T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Juan Wang, Ze-Hong Zou, Hong-Lin Xia, Jian-Xing He, Nan-Shan Zhong, Ai-Lin Tao&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Immunotherapy has yielded no consistent benefit to date for those patients. Assessing the objective efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC patients will help to instruct the future development of immunotherapeutic drugs.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology and Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We performed a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials including 3134 patients (1570 patients in the immunotherapy group and 1564 patients in the control group) with histologically confirmed stage IIIA, IIIB, or IV NSCLC. The analysis was executed with efficacy end points regarding overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and total effective rate. Overall unstratified OS, PFS, PR, and total effective rate were significantly improved in advanced NSCLC patients in the immunotherapy group (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.0007, 0.0004, 0.002, 0.003, respectively), whereas CR was not improved (&lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.97). Subgroup analysis showed that monoclonal antibody (mAb) immunotherapy significantly improved the PFS, PR, and total effective rate and showed a trend of improving OS of advanced NSCLC patients compared with the control group, with one kind of adverse event being significantly dominant. Compared with the control group, the vaccine subgroup showed no significant difference with regard to serious adverse events, whereas cytokine immunotherapy significantly induced three kinds of serious adverse events.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Immunotherapy works efficiently on advanced NSCLC patients. Of several immunotherapies, mAb therapy may be a potential immunotherapy for advanced NSCLC patients, and become a standard complementary therapeutic approach in the future if the issues concerning toxicity and allergenicity of mAbs have been overcome.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/wIqW5xoVYgg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0032695</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Glutathione Precursor N-Acetyl-Cysteine Modulates EEG Synchronization in Schizophrenia Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/c8pBdtpg6Ww/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029341" title="Glutathione Precursor N-Acetyl-Cysteine Modulates EEG Synchronization in Schizophrenia Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029341&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Glutathione Precursor N-Acetyl-Cysteine Modulates EEG Synchronization in Schizophrenia Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029341&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Glutathione Precursor N-Acetyl-Cysteine Modulates EEG Synchronization in Schizophrenia Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Cristian Carmeli et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029341</id>
    <updated>2012-02-22T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-22T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Cristian Carmeli, Maria G. Knyazeva, Michel Cuénod, Kim Q. Do&lt;/p&gt;
Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01506765&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/c8pBdtpg6Ww" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029341</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Phase Ia Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of the Plasmodium falciparum Blood-Stage Antigen AMA1 in ChAd63 and MVA Vaccine Vectors</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/8zkXFUuYAUU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031208" title="Phase Ia Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of the Plasmodium falciparum Blood-Stage Antigen AMA1 in ChAd63 and MVA Vaccine Vectors" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031208&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Phase Ia Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of the Plasmodium falciparum Blood-Stage Antigen AMA1 in ChAd63 and MVA Vaccine Vectors" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031208&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Phase Ia Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of the Plasmodium falciparum Blood-Stage Antigen AMA1 in ChAd63 and MVA Vaccine Vectors" />
    <author>
      <name>Susanne H. Sheehy et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031208</id>
    <updated>2012-02-21T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-21T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Susanne H. Sheehy, Christopher J. A. Duncan, Sean C. Elias, Sumi Biswas, Katharine A. Collins, Geraldine A. O'Hara, Fenella D. Halstead, Katie J. Ewer, Tabitha Mahungu, Alexandra J. Spencer, Kazutoyo Miura, Ian D. Poulton, Matthew D. J. Dicks, Nick J. Edwards, Eleanor Berrie, Sarah Moyle, Stefano Colloca, Riccardo Cortese, Katherine Gantlett, Carole A. Long, Alison M. Lawrie, Sarah C. Gilbert, Tom Doherty, Alfredo Nicosia, Adrian V. S. Hill, Simon J. Draper&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Traditionally, vaccine development against the blood-stage of &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium falciparum&lt;/i&gt; infection has focused on recombinant protein-adjuvant formulations in order to induce high-titer growth-inhibitory antibody responses. However, to date no such vaccine encoding a blood-stage antigen(s) alone has induced significant protective efficacy against erythrocytic-stage infection in a pre-specified primary endpoint of a Phase IIa/b clinical trial designed to assess vaccine efficacy. Cell-mediated responses, acting in conjunction with functional antibodies, may be necessary for immunity against blood-stage &lt;i&gt;P. falciparum&lt;/i&gt;. The development of a vaccine that could induce both cell-mediated and humoral immune responses would enable important proof-of-concept efficacy studies to be undertaken to address this question.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology &lt;p&gt;We conducted a Phase Ia, non-randomized clinical trial in 16 healthy, malaria-naïve adults of the chimpanzee adenovirus 63 (ChAd63) and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) replication-deficient viral vectored vaccines encoding two alleles (3D7 and FVO) of the &lt;i&gt;P. falciparum&lt;/i&gt; blood-stage malaria antigen; apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1). ChAd63-MVA AMA1 administered in a heterologous prime-boost regime was shown to be safe and immunogenic, inducing high-level T cell responses to both alleles 3D7 (median 2036 SFU/million PBMC) and FVO (median 1539 SFU/million PBMC), with a mixed CD4&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt;/CD8&lt;sup&gt;+&lt;/sup&gt; phenotype, as well as substantial AMA1-specific serum IgG responses (medians of 49 µg/mL and 41 µg/mL for 3D7 and FVO AMA1 respectively) that demonstrated growth inhibitory activity &lt;i&gt;in vitro&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;ChAd63-MVA is a safe and highly immunogenic delivery platform for both alleles of the AMA1 antigen in humans which warrants further efficacy testing. ChAd63-MVA is a promising heterologous prime-boost vaccine strategy that could be applied to numerous other diseases where strong cellular and humoral immune responses are required for protection.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01095055&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/8zkXFUuYAUU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031208</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effectiveness of Terbutaline Pump for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/4xVfpRFO-dU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031679" title="Effectiveness of Terbutaline Pump for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031679&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Effectiveness of Terbutaline Pump for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031679&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Effectiveness of Terbutaline Pump for the Prevention of Preterm Birth. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <author>
      <name>Laura M. Gaudet et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031679</id>
    <updated>2012-02-21T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-21T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Laura M. Gaudet, Kavita Singh, Laura Weeks, Becky Skidmore, Alexander Tsertsvadze, Mohammed T. Ansari&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Subcutaneous terbutaline (SQ terbutaline) infusion by pump is used in pregnant women as a prolonged (beyond 48–72 h) maintenance tocolytic following acute treatment of preterm contractions. The effectiveness and safety of this maintenance tocolysis have not been clearly established. We aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous (SQ) terbutaline infusion by pump for maintenance tocolysis.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases, post-marketing surveillance data and grey literature were searched up to April 2011 for relevant experimental and observational studies.Two randomized trials, one nonrandomized trial, and 11 observational studies met inclusion criteria. Non-comparative studies were considered only for pump-related harms. We excluded case-reports but sought FDA summaries of post-marketing surveillance data. Non-English records without an English abstract were excluded. Evidence of low strength from observational studies with risk of bias favored SQ terbutaline pump for the outcomes of delivery at &lt;32 and &lt;37 weeks, mean days of pregnancy prolongation, and neonatal death. Observational studies of medium to high risk of bias also demonstrated benefit for other surrogate outcomes, such as birthweight and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Several cases of maternal deaths and maternal cardiovascular events have been reported in patients receiving terbutaline tocolysis.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;Although evidence suggests that pump therapy &lt;i&gt;may&lt;/i&gt; be beneficial as maintenance tocolysis, our confidence in its validity and reproducibility is low, suggesting that its use should be limited to the research setting. Concerns regarding safety of therapy persist.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/4xVfpRFO-dU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031679</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Incidence and Risk of QTc Interval Prolongation among Cancer Patients Treated with Vandetanib: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/dOz7ZpFPjEA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030353" title="Incidence and Risk of QTc Interval Prolongation among Cancer Patients Treated with Vandetanib: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030353&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Incidence and Risk of QTc Interval Prolongation among Cancer Patients Treated with Vandetanib: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030353&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Incidence and Risk of QTc Interval Prolongation among Cancer Patients Treated with Vandetanib: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis" />
    <author>
      <name>Jiajie Zang et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030353</id>
    <updated>2012-02-17T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-17T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jiajie Zang, Shunquan Wu, Lei Tang, Xudong Xu, Jie Bai, Caicui Ding, Yue Chang, Long Yue, Enming Kang, Jia He&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Vandetanib is a multikinase inhibitor that is under assessment for the treatment of various cancers. QTc interval prolongation is one of the major adverse effects of this drug, but the reported incidence varies substantially among clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain a better understanding in the risk of QTc interval prolongation among cancer patients administered vandetanib.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology and Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;Eligible studies were phase II and III prospective clinical trials that involved cancer patients who were prescribed vandetanib 300 mg/d and that included data on QTc interval prolongation. The overall incidence and risk of QTc interval prolongation were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Nine trials with 2,188 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade QTc interval prolongation was 16.4% (95% CI, 8.1–30.4%) and 3.7% (8.1–30.4%), respectively, among non-thyroid cancer patients, and 18.0% (10.7–28.6%) and 12.0% (4.5–28.0%), respectively, among thyroid cancer patients. Patients with thyroid cancer who had longer treatment duration also had a higher incidence of high-grade events, with a relative risk of 3.24 (1.57–6.71), than patients who had non-thyroid cancer. Vandetanib was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade QTc interval prolongation with overall Peto odds ratios of 7.26 (4.36–12.09) and 5.70 (3.09–10.53) among patients with non-thyroid cancer and thyroid cancer, respectively, compared to the controls.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;Treatment with vandetanib is associated with a significant increase in the overall incidence and risk of QTc interval prolongation. Different cancer types and treatment durations may affect the risk of developing high-grade QTc interval prolongation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/dOz7ZpFPjEA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030353</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/fo_anWuEjbI/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031586" title="A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031586&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031586&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers" />
    <author>
      <name>John A. Cunningham et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031586</id>
    <updated>2012-02-14T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-14T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by John A. Cunningham, David C. Hodgins, Tony Toneatto, Michelle Murphy&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00578357&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/fo_anWuEjbI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031586</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effects of Combined Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/VAhuhQp4JT4/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031642" title="Effects of Combined Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031642&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Effects of Combined Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031642&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Effects of Combined Aspirin and Clopidogrel Therapy on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <author>
      <name>Yu-Hao Zhou et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0031642</id>
    <updated>2012-02-13T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-13T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Yu-Hao Zhou, Xin Wei, Jian Lu, Xiao-Fei Ye, Mei-Jing Wu, Jin-Fang Xu, Ying-Yi Qin, Jia He&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Aspirin and clopidogrel monotherapies are effective treatments for preventing vascular disease. However, new evidence has emerged regarding the use of combined aspirin and clopidogrel therapy to prevent cardiovascular events. We therefore performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and harms of combined aspirin and clopidogrel therapy on major cardiovascular outcomes.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We systematically searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, reference lists of articles, and proceedings of major meetings to identify studies to fit our analysis. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of combined aspirin and clopidogrel therapy compared with aspirin or clopidogrel monotherapy. We identified 7 trials providing data with a total of 48248 patients. These studies reported 5134 major cardiovascular events, 1626 myocardial infarctions, 1927 strokes, and 1147 major bleeding events. Overall, the addition of aspirin to clopidogrel therapy as compared to single drug therapy resulted in a 9% RR reduction (95%CI, 2 to 17) in major cardiovascular events, 14% RR reduction (95%CI, 3 to 24) in myocardial infarction, 16% RR reduction (95%CI, 1 to 28) in stroke, and 62% RR increase (95%CI, 26 to 108) in major bleeding events. We also present the data as ARR to explore net value as the reduction in cardiovascular events. Overall, we observed that combined therapy yielded 1.06% decrease (95%CI, 0.23% to 1.99%) in major cardiovascular events and 1.23% increase (95%CI, 0.52% to 2.14%) in major bleeding events.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion/Significance &lt;p&gt;Although the addition of aspirin to clopidogrel resulted in small relative reductions in major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and stroke, it also resulted in a relative increase in major bleeding events. In absolute terms the benefits of combined therapy, a 1.06% reduction in major cardiovascular events, does not outweigh the harms, a 1.23% increase in major bleeding events.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/VAhuhQp4JT4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0031642</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by High-Impact Medical Journals in China: A Survey of Instructions for Authors and Published Papers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/AnG1mIImICM/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030683" title="Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by High-Impact Medical Journals in China: A Survey of Instructions for Authors and Published Papers" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030683&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by High-Impact Medical Journals in China: A Survey of Instructions for Authors and Published Papers" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030683&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by High-Impact Medical Journals in China: A Survey of Instructions for Authors and Published Papers" />
    <author>
      <name>Xiao-qian Li et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030683</id>
    <updated>2012-02-13T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-13T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Xiao-qian Li, Kun-ming Tao, Qing-hui Zhou, David Moher, Hong-yun Chen, Fu-zhe Wang, Chang-quan Ling&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The CONSORT Statement is a reporting guideline for authors when reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It offers a standard way for authors to prepare RCT reports. It has been endorsed by many high-impact medical journals and by international editorial groups. This study was conducted to assess the endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high-impact medical journals in China by reviewing their instructions for authors.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;A total of 200 medical journals were selected according to the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Citation Reports, 195 of which publish clinical research papers. Their instructions for authors were reviewed and all texts mentioning the CONSORT Statement or CONSORT extension papers were extracted. Any mention of the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (URM) developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) or ‘clinical trial registration’ was also extracted. For journals endorsing the CONSORT Statement, their most recently published RCT reports were retrieved and evaluated to assess whether the journals have followed what the CONSORT Statement required. Out of the 195 medical journals publishing clinical research papers, only six (6/195, 3.08%) mentioned ‘CONSORT’ in their instructions for authors; out of the 200 medical journals surveyed, only 14 (14/200, 7.00%) mentioned ‘ICMJE’ or ‘URM’ in their instructions for authors, and another five journals stated in their instructions for authors that clinical trials should have trial registration numbers and that priority would be given to clinical trials which had been registered. Among the 62 RCT reports published in the six journals endorsing the CONSORT Statement, 20 (20/62, 32.26%) contained flow diagrams and only three (3/62, 4.84%) provided trial registration information.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;Medical journals in China endorsing either the CONSORT Statement or the ICMJE's URM constituted a small percentage of the total; all of these journals used ambiguous language regarding what was expected of authors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/AnG1mIImICM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030683</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Massage Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Dose-Finding Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/LgkkXrOBnFs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030248" title="Massage Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Dose-Finding Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030248&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Massage Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Dose-Finding Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030248&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Massage Therapy for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Randomized Dose-Finding Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Adam I. Perlman et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030248</id>
    <updated>2012-02-08T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-08T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Adam I. Perlman, Ather Ali, Valentine Yanchou Njike, David Hom, Anna Davidi, Susan Gould-Fogerite, Carl Milak, David L. Katz&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;In a previous trial of massage for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee, we demonstrated feasibility, safety and possible efficacy, with benefits that persisted at least 8 weeks beyond treatment termination.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We performed a RCT to identify the optimal dose of massage within an 8-week treatment regimen and to further examine durability of response. Participants were 125 adults with OA of the knee, randomized to one of four 8-week regimens of a standardized Swedish massage regimen (30 or 60 min weekly or biweekly) or to a Usual Care control. Outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), visual analog pain scale, range of motion, and time to walk 50 feet, assessed at baseline, 8-, 16-, and 24-weeks.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;WOMAC Global scores improved significantly (24.0 points, 95% CI ranged from 15.3–32.7) in the 60-minute massage groups compared to Usual Care (6.3 points, 95% CI 0.1–12.8) at the primary endpoint of 8-weeks. WOMAC subscales of pain and functionality, as well as the visual analog pain scale also demonstrated significant improvements in the 60-minute doses compared to usual care. No significant differences were seen in range of motion at 8-weeks, and no significant effects were seen in any outcome measure at 24-weeks compared to usual care. A dose-response curve based on WOMAC Global scores shows increasing effect with greater total time of massage, but with a plateau at the 60-minute/week dose.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;Given the superior convenience of a once-weekly protocol, cost savings, and consistency with a typical real-world massage protocol, the 60-minute once weekly dose was determined to be optimal, establishing a standard for future trials.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00970008&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/LgkkXrOBnFs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030248</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effects of Sorafenib on Intra-Tumoral Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Refractory Sarcomas (NCI Protocol 6948)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/V-Q6d8j-280/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026331" title="Effects of Sorafenib on Intra-Tumoral Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Refractory Sarcomas (NCI Protocol 6948)" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026331&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Effects of Sorafenib on Intra-Tumoral Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Refractory Sarcomas (NCI Protocol 6948)" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026331&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Effects of Sorafenib on Intra-Tumoral Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Refractory Sarcomas (NCI Protocol 6948)" />
    <author>
      <name>Chandrajit P. Raut et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026331</id>
    <updated>2012-02-07T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-07T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Chandrajit P. Raut, Yves Boucher, Dan G. Duda, Jeffrey A. Morgan, Richard Quek, Marek Ancukiewicz, Johanna Lahdenranta, J. Paul Eder, George D. Demetri, Rakesh K. Jain&lt;/p&gt;
Purpose &lt;p&gt;Sorafenib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with therapeutic efficacy in several malignancies. Sorafenib may exert its anti-neoplastic effect in part by altering vascular permeability and reducing intra-tumoral interstitial hypertension. As correlative science with a phase II study in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS), we evaluated the impact of this agent on intra-tumor interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), serum circulating biomarkers, and vascular density.&lt;/p&gt; Patients and Methods &lt;p&gt;Patients with advanced STS with measurable disease and at least one superficial lesion amenable to biopsy received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily. Intratumoral IFP and plasma and circulating cell biomarkers were measured before and after 1–2 months of sorafenib administration. Results were analyzed in the context of the primary clinical endpoint of time-to-progression (TTP).&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;In 15 patients accrued, the median TTP was 45 days (range 14–228). Intra-tumoral IFP measurements obtained in 6 patients at baseline showed a direct correlation with tumor size. Two patients with stable disease at two months had post-sorafenib IFP evaluations and demonstrated a decline in IFP and vascular density. Sorafenib significantly increased plasma VEGF, PlGF, and SDF1α and decreased sVEGFR-2 levels. Increased plasma SDF1α and decreased sVEGFR-2 levels on day 28 correlated with disease progression.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Pretreatment intra-tumoral IFP correlated with tumor size and decreased in two evaluable patients with SD on sorafenib. Sorafenib also induced changes in circulating biomarkers consistent with expected VEGF pathway blockade, despite the lack of more striking clinical activity in this small series.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00330421&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/V-Q6d8j-280" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026331</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Noradrenergic α1 Receptor Antagonist Treatment Attenuates Positive Subjective Effects of Cocaine in Humans: A Randomized Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/KkpAEq4CIio/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030854" title="Noradrenergic α1 Receptor Antagonist Treatment Attenuates Positive Subjective Effects of Cocaine in Humans: A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030854&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Noradrenergic α1 Receptor Antagonist Treatment Attenuates Positive Subjective Effects of Cocaine in Humans: A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030854&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Noradrenergic α1 Receptor Antagonist Treatment Attenuates Positive Subjective Effects of Cocaine in Humans: A Randomized Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Thomas F. Newton et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030854</id>
    <updated>2012-02-03T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-02-03T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Thomas F. Newton, Richard De La Garza, Gregory Brown, Thomas R. Kosten, James J. Mahoney, Colin N. Haile&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Preclinical research implicates dopaminergic and noradrenergic mechanisms in mediating the reinforcing effects of drugs of abuse, including cocaine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of treatment with the noradrenergic α&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; receptor antagonist doxazosin on the positive subjective effects of cocaine.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;Thirteen non-treatment seeking, cocaine-dependent volunteers completed this single-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, within-subjects study. In one study phase volunteers received placebo and in the other they received doxazosin, with the order counterbalanced across participants. Study medication was masked by over-encapsulating doxazosin tablets and matched placebo lactose served as the control. Study medication treatment was initiated at 1 mg doxazosin or equivalent number of placebo capsules PO/day and increased every three days by 1 mg. After receiving 4 mg doxazosin or equivalent number of placebo capsules participants received masked doses of 20 and 40 mg cocaine IV in that order with placebo saline randomly interspersed to maintain the blind.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Doxazosin treatment was well tolerated and doxazosin alone produced minimal changes in heart rate and blood pressure. During treatment with placebo, cocaine produced dose-dependent increases in subjective effect ratings of “high”, “stimulated”, “like cocaine”, “desire cocaine”, “any drug effect”, and “likely to use cocaine if had access” (p&lt;.001). Doxazosin treatment significantly attenuated the effects of 20 mg cocaine on ratings of “stimulated”, “like cocaine”, and “likely to use cocaine if had access” (p&lt;.05). There were trends for doxazosin to reduce ratings of “stimulated”, “desire cocaine”, and “likely to use cocaine if had access” (p&lt;.10).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Medications that block noradrenergic α&lt;sub&gt;1&lt;/sub&gt; receptors, such as doxazosin, may be useful as treatments for cocaine dependence, and should be evaluated further.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01062945&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/KkpAEq4CIio" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030854</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Melioidosis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Potential to Exploit Biodefense Vaccines for Public Health Purposes</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/E-kUGToG1tE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0001488" title="Melioidosis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Potential to Exploit Biodefense Vaccines for Public Health Purposes" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001488&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Melioidosis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Potential to Exploit Biodefense Vaccines for Public Health Purposes" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001488&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Melioidosis Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of the Potential to Exploit Biodefense Vaccines for Public Health Purposes" />
    <author>
      <name>Sharon J. Peacock et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001488</id>
    <updated>2012-01-31T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-31T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Sharon J. Peacock, Direk Limmathurotsakul, Yoel Lubell, Gavin C. K. W. Koh, Lisa J. White, Nicholas P. J. Day, Richard W. Titball&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Burkholderia pseudomallei&lt;/i&gt; is a Category B select agent and the cause of melioidosis. Research funding for vaccine development has largely considered protection within the biothreat context, but the resulting vaccines could be applicable to populations who are at risk of naturally acquired melioidosis. Here, we discuss target populations for vaccination, consider the cost-benefit of different vaccination strategies and review potential vaccine candidates.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;Melioidosis is highly endemic in Thailand and northern Australia, where a biodefense vaccine might be adopted for public health purposes. A cost-effectiveness analysis model was developed, which showed that a vaccine could be a cost-effective intervention in Thailand, particularly if used in high-risk populations such as diabetics. Cost-effectiveness was observed in a model in which only partial immunity was assumed. The review systematically summarized all melioidosis vaccine candidates and studies in animal models that had evaluated their protectiveness. Possible candidates included live attenuated, whole cell killed, sub-unit, plasmid DNA and dendritic cell vaccines. Live attenuated vaccines were not considered favorably because of possible reversion to virulence and hypothetical risk of latent infection, while the other candidates need further development and evaluation. Melioidosis is acquired by skin inoculation, inhalation and ingestion, but routes of animal inoculation in most published studies to date do not reflect all of this. We found a lack of studies using diabetic models, which will be central to any evaluation of a melioidosis vaccine for natural infection since diabetes is the most important risk factor.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;Vaccines could represent one strand of a public health initiative to reduce the global incidence of melioidosis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/E-kUGToG1tE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0001488</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Quality Control and Performance of HIV Rapid Tests in a Microbicide Clinical Trial in Rural KwaZulu-Natal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/2lZ309KxriA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030728" title="Quality Control and Performance of HIV Rapid Tests in a Microbicide Clinical Trial in Rural KwaZulu-Natal" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030728&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Quality Control and Performance of HIV Rapid Tests in a Microbicide Clinical Trial in Rural KwaZulu-Natal" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030728&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Quality Control and Performance of HIV Rapid Tests in a Microbicide Clinical Trial in Rural KwaZulu-Natal" />
    <author>
      <name>Nina von Knorring et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>the MDP Team</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030728</id>
    <updated>2012-01-30T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-30T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Nina von Knorring, Mitzy Gafos, Motsei Ramokonupi, Ute Jentsch, the MDP Team&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Quality control (QC) and evaluation of HIV rapid test procedures are an important aspect of HIV prevention trials. We describe QC and performance of two rapid tests, &lt;i&gt;Determine™&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Uni-Gold™&lt;/i&gt; used in a microbicide clinical trial in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.&lt;/p&gt; Methods/Results &lt;p&gt;Internal QC of both HIV rapid tests was conducted at the trial site using a Uni-Gold control kit (&lt;i&gt;Uni-Gold™Recombigen® HIV&lt;/i&gt;). Both assays produced the expected results for a total of 4637 QC tests. Study participants were tested for HIV at screening and, if enrolled, at regular time points throughout the study. Positive or discordant results were confirmed by a double HIV immunoassay testing strategy at a local laboratory. Overall, 15292 HIV rapid test were performed. Sensitivity and specificity of Determine was 98.95% (95% CI: 97.72–99.61) and 99.83% (95% CI: 99.70–99.91) respectively [positive predictive value (PPV) 97.91% (95% CI: 96.38–98.92)], for Uni-Gold it was 99.30% (95% CI: 98.21–99.81) and 99.96% (95% CI: 99.88–99.99) respectively [PPV 99.47% (95% CI: 98.46–99.89)].&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;The results suggest that a Uni-Gold control kit can be used for internal QC of both Uni-Gold and the HIV-1 component of the Determine rapid tests. Both rapid tests performed proficiently in the trial population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/2lZ309KxriA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030728</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Does a Family Meetings Intervention Prevent Depression and Anxiety in Family Caregivers of Dementia Patients? A Randomized Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/tQRjuv4PIVI/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030936" title="Does a Family Meetings Intervention Prevent Depression and Anxiety in Family Caregivers of Dementia Patients? A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030936&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Does a Family Meetings Intervention Prevent Depression and Anxiety in Family Caregivers of Dementia Patients? A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030936&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Does a Family Meetings Intervention Prevent Depression and Anxiety in Family Caregivers of Dementia Patients? A Randomized Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Karlijn J. Joling et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030936</id>
    <updated>2012-01-27T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-27T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Karlijn J. Joling, Harm W. J. van Marwijk, Filip Smit, Henriëtte E. van der Horst, Philip Scheltens, Peter M. van de Ven, Mary S. Mittelman, Hein P. J. van Hout&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Family caregivers of dementia patients are at increased risk of developing depression or anxiety. A multi-component program designed to mobilize support of family networks demonstrated effectiveness in decreasing depressive symptoms in caregivers. However, the impact of an intervention consisting solely of family meetings on depression and anxiety has not yet been evaluated. This study examines the preventive effects of family meetings for primary caregivers of community-dwelling dementia patients.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;A randomized multicenter trial was conducted among 192 primary caregivers of community dwelling dementia patients. Caregivers did not meet the diagnostic criteria for depressive or anxiety disorder at baseline. Participants were randomized to the family meetings intervention (n = 96) or usual care (n = 96) condition. The intervention consisted of two individual sessions and four family meetings which occurred once every 2 to 3 months for a year. Outcome measures after 12 months were the incidence of a clinical depressive or anxiety disorder and change in depressive and anxiety symptoms (primary outcomes), caregiver burden and quality of life (secondary outcomes). Intention-to-treat as well as per protocol analyses were performed.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;A substantial number of caregivers (72/192) developed a depressive or anxiety disorder within 12 months. The intervention was not superior to usual care either in reducing the risk of disorder onset (adjusted IRR 0.98; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.38) or in reducing depressive (randomization-by-time interaction coefficient = −1.40; 95% CI −3.91 to 1.10) or anxiety symptoms (randomization-by-time interaction coefficient = −0.55; 95% CI −1.59 to 0.49). The intervention did not reduce caregiver burden or their health related quality of life.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;This study did not demonstrate preventive effects of family meetings on the mental health of family caregivers. Further research should determine whether this intervention might be more beneficial if provided in a more concentrated dose, when applied for therapeutic purposes or targeted towards subgroups of caregivers.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN90163486&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/tQRjuv4PIVI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030936</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>International Technology Transfer of a GCLP-Compliant HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Human Clinical Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/UFivTF_D2fk/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030963" title="International Technology Transfer of a GCLP-Compliant HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Human Clinical Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030963&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) International Technology Transfer of a GCLP-Compliant HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Human Clinical Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030963&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) International Technology Transfer of a GCLP-Compliant HIV-1 Neutralizing Antibody Assay for Human Clinical Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Daniel A. Ozaki et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030963</id>
    <updated>2012-01-27T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-27T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Daniel A. Ozaki, Hongmei Gao, Christopher A. Todd, Kelli M. Greene, David C. Montefiori, Marcella Sarzotti-Kelsoe&lt;/p&gt;

        The Collaboration for AIDS Vaccine Discovery/Comprehensive Antibody – Vaccine Immune Monitoring Consortium (CAVD/CA-VIMC) assisted an international network of laboratories in transferring a validated assay used to judge HIV-1 vaccine immunogenicity in compliance with Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) with the goal of adding quality to the conduct of endpoint assays for Human Immunodeficiency Virus I (HIV-1) vaccine human clinical trials. Eight Regional Laboratories in the international setting (Regional Laboratories), many located in regions where the HIV-1 epidemic is most prominent, were selected to implement the standardized, GCLP-compliant Neutralizing Antibody Assay for HIV-1 in TZM-bl Cells (TZM-bl NAb Assay). Each laboratory was required to undergo initial training and implementation of the immunologic assay on-site and then perform partial assay re-validation, competency testing, and undergo formal external audits for GCLP compliance. Furthermore, using a newly established external proficiency testing program for the TZM-bl NAb Assay has allowed the Regional Laboratories to assess the comparability of assay results at their site with the results of neutralizing antibody assays performed around the world. As a result, several of the CAVD/CA-VIMC Regional Laboratories are now in the process of conducting or planning to conduct the GCLP-compliant TZM-bl NAb Assay as an indicator of vaccine immunogenicity for ongoing human clinical trials.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/UFivTF_D2fk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030963</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Interventions to Influence Consulting and Antibiotic Use for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/ORcRKFeLaTM/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030334" title="Interventions to Influence Consulting and Antibiotic Use for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030334&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Interventions to Influence Consulting and Antibiotic Use for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030334&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Interventions to Influence Consulting and Antibiotic Use for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <author>
      <name>Talley Andrews et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030334</id>
    <updated>2012-01-27T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-27T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Talley Andrews, Matthew Thompson, David I. Buckley, Carl Heneghan, Rick Deyo, Niamh Redmond, Patricia J. Lucas, Peter S. Blair, Alastair D. Hay&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are common in children and generally self-limiting, yet often result in consultations to primary care. Frequent consultations divert resources from care for potentially more serious conditions and increase the opportunity for antibiotic overuse. Overuse of antibiotics is associated with adverse effects and antimicrobial resistance, and has been shown to influence how patients seek care in ensuing illness episodes.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of interventions directed towards parents or caregivers which were designed to influence consulting and antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in children in primary care. Main outcomes were parental consulting rate, parental knowledge, and proportion of children subsequently consuming antibiotics. Of 5,714 references, 23 studies (representing 20 interventions) met inclusion criteria. Materials designed to engage children in addition to parents were effective in modifying parental knowledge and behaviour, resulting in reductions in consulting rates ranging from 13 to 40%. Providing parents with delayed prescriptions significantly decreased reported antibiotic use (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.46 (0.40, 0.54); moreover, a delayed or no prescribing approach did not diminish parental satisfaction.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;In order to be most effective, interventions to influence parental consulting and antibiotic use should: engage children, occur prior to an illness episode, employ delayed prescribing, and provide guidance on specific symptoms. These results support the wider implementation of interventions to reduce inappropriate antibiotic use in children.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/ORcRKFeLaTM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030334</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Facemasks, Hand Hygiene, and Influenza among Young Adults: A Randomized Intervention Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/-h03FepY41E/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029744" title="Facemasks, Hand Hygiene, and Influenza among Young Adults: A Randomized Intervention Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029744&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Facemasks, Hand Hygiene, and Influenza among Young Adults: A Randomized Intervention Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029744&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Facemasks, Hand Hygiene, and Influenza among Young Adults: A Randomized Intervention Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Allison E. Aiello et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029744</id>
    <updated>2012-01-25T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-25T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Allison E. Aiello, Vanessa Perez, Rebecca M. Coulborn, Brian M. Davis, Monica Uddin, Arnold S. Monto&lt;/p&gt;
Trail Registration &lt;p&gt;Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00490633&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/-h03FepY41E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029744</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Clinical Pharmacists on Medical Care of Pediatric Inpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/Kh5ec1pr6cc/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030856" title="Clinical Pharmacists on Medical Care of Pediatric Inpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030856&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Clinical Pharmacists on Medical Care of Pediatric Inpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030856&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Clinical Pharmacists on Medical Care of Pediatric Inpatients: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Chuan Zhang et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030856</id>
    <updated>2012-01-23T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-23T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Chuan Zhang, Lingli Zhang, Liang Huang, Rong Luo, Jin Wen&lt;/p&gt;
Objective &lt;p&gt;To explore the best interventions and working patterns of clinical pharmacists in pediatrics and to determine the effectiveness of clinical pharmacists in pediatrics.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 160 pediatric patients with nerve system disease, respiratory system disease or digestive system disease, who were randomly allocated into two groups, with 80 in each group. Interventions by clinical pharmacists in the experimental group included answering questions of physicians and nurses, giving advice on treating patients, checking prescriptions and patient counseling at discharge. In the control group, patients were treated without clinical pharmacist interventions.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Of the 109 interventions provided by clinical pharmacists during 4 months, 47 were consultations for physicians and nurses, 31 were suggestions of treatment, with 30 accepted by physicians (96.77%) and 31 were medical errors found in 641 prescriptions. Five adverse drug reactions were submitted to the adverse drug reaction monitoring network, with three in the experimental group and two in the control group. The average length of stay (LOS) for patients with respiratory system diseases in the experimental group was 6.45 days, in comparison with 10.83 days in the control group, which was statistically different (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; value&lt;0.05); Average drug compliance rate in the experimental group was 81.41%, in comparison with 70.17% of the control group, which was statistically different (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; value&lt;0.05). Cost of drugs and hospitalization and rate of readmission in two weeks after discharge in the two groups were not statistically different.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;Participation by clinical pharmacists in the pharmacotherapy of pediatric patients can reduce LOS of patients with respiratory system disease and improve compliance rate through discharge education, showing no significant effects on prevention of ADR, reduction of cost of drugs and hospitalization and readmission rate in two weeks.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-10001081&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/Kh5ec1pr6cc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030856</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Existing TNF Blocking Agents in Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/76lIkR9wkf8/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030275" title="Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Existing TNF Blocking Agents in Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030275&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Existing TNF Blocking Agents in Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030275&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Existing TNF Blocking Agents in Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis" />
    <author>
      <name>Kalle J. Aaltonen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030275</id>
    <updated>2012-01-17T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-17T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Kalle J. Aaltonen, Liisa M. Virkki, Antti Malmivaara, Yrjö T. Konttinen, Dan C. Nordström, Marja Blom&lt;/p&gt;
Background and Objectives &lt;p&gt;Five-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol and golimumab) are available for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Only few clinical trials compare one TNF-blocker to another. Hence, a systematic review is required to indirectly compare the substances. The aim of our study is to estimate the efficacy and the safety of TNF-blockers in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and indirectly compare all five currently available blockers by combining the results from included randomized clinical trials (RCT).&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;A systematic literature review was conducted using databases including: MEDLINE, SCOPUS (including EMBASE), Cochrane library and electronic search alerts. Only articles reporting double-blind RCTs of TNF-blockers &lt;i&gt;vs.&lt;/i&gt; placebo, with or without concomitant methotrexate (MTX), in treatment of RA were selected. Data collected were information of patients, interventions, controls, outcomes, study methods and eventual sources of bias.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Forty-one articles reporting on 26 RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Five RCTs studied infliximab, seven etanercept, eight adalimumab, three golimumab and three certolizumab. TNF-blockers were more efficacious than placebo at all time points but were comparable to MTX. TNF-blocker and MTX combination was superior to either MTX or TNF-blocker alone. Increasing doses did not improve the efficacy. TNF-blockers were relatively safe compared to either MTX or placebo.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;No single substance clearly rose above others in efficacy, but the results of the safety analyses suggest that etanercept might be the safest alternative. Interestingly, MTX performs nearly identically considering both efficacy and safety aspects with a margin of costs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/76lIkR9wkf8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030275</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The 24-h Energy Intake of Obese Adolescents Is Spontaneously Reduced after Intensive Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Calorimetric Chambers</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/Gmu4D1vJz20/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029840" title="The 24-h Energy Intake of Obese Adolescents Is Spontaneously Reduced after Intensive Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Calorimetric Chambers" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029840&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The 24-h Energy Intake of Obese Adolescents Is Spontaneously Reduced after Intensive Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Calorimetric Chambers" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029840&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The 24-h Energy Intake of Obese Adolescents Is Spontaneously Reduced after Intensive Exercise: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Calorimetric Chambers" />
    <author>
      <name>David Thivel et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029840</id>
    <updated>2012-01-17T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-17T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by David Thivel, Laurie Isacco, Christophe Montaurier, Yves Boirie, Pascale Duché, Béatrice Morio&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Physical exercise can modify subsequent energy intake and appetite and may thus be of particular interest in terms of obesity treatment. However, it is still unclear whether an intensive bout of exercise can affect the energy consumption of obese children and adolescents.&lt;/p&gt; Objective &lt;p&gt;To compare the impact of high vs. moderate intensity exercises on subsequent 24-h energy intake, macronutrient preferences, appetite sensations, energy expenditure and balance in obese adolescent.&lt;/p&gt; Design &lt;p&gt;This randomized cross-over trial involves 15 obese adolescent boys who were asked to randomly complete three 24-h sessions in a metabolic chamber, each separated by at least 7 days: (1) sedentary (SED); (2) Low-Intensity Exercise (LIE) (40% maximal oxygen uptake, VO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;max); (3) High-Intensity Exercise (HIE) (75%VO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt;max).&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Despite unchanged appetite sensations, 24-h total energy intake following HIE was 6–11% lower compared to LIE and SED (p&lt;0.05), whereas no differences appeared between SED and LIE. Energy intake at lunch was 9.4% and 8.4% lower after HIE compared to SED and LIE, respectively (p&lt;0.05). At dinner time, it was 20.5% and 19.7% lower after HIE compared to SED and LIE, respectively (p&lt;0.01). 24-h energy expenditure was not significantly altered. Thus, the 24-h energy balance was significantly reduced during HIE compared to SED and LIE (p&lt;0.01), whereas those of SED and LIE did not differ.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;In obese adolescent boys, HIE has a beneficial impact on 24-h energy balance, mainly due to the spontaneous decrease in energy intake during lunch and dinner following the exercise bout. Prescribing high-intensity exercises to promote weight loss may therefore provide effective results without affecting appetite sensations and, as a result, food frustrations.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrial.gov NCT01036360&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/Gmu4D1vJz20" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029840</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Phase I Evaluation of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid in Combination with Gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/hhvIzkJ0PrI/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029794" title="Phase I Evaluation of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid in Combination with Gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029794&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Phase I Evaluation of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid in Combination with Gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029794&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Phase I Evaluation of Intravenous Ascorbic Acid in Combination with Gemcitabine and Erlotinib in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer" />
    <author>
      <name>Daniel A. Monti et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029794</id>
    <updated>2012-01-17T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-17T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Daniel A. Monti, Edith Mitchell, Anthony J. Bazzan, Susan Littman, George Zabrecky, Charles J. Yeo, Madhaven V. Pillai, Andrew B. Newberg, Sandeep Deshmukh, Mark Levine&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Preclinical data support further investigation of ascorbic acid in pancreatic cancer. There are currently insufficient safety data in human subjects, particularly when ascorbic acid is combined with chemotherapy.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;14 subjects with metastatic stage IV pancreatic cancer were recruited to receive an eight week cycle of intravenous ascorbic acid (three infusions per week), using a dose escalation design, along with standard treatment of gemcitabine and erlotinib. Of 14 recruited subjects enrolled, nine completed the study (three in each dosage tier). There were fifteen non-serious adverse events and eight serious adverse events, all likely related to progression of disease or treatment with gemcitabine or erlotinib. Applying RECIST 1.0 criteria, seven of the nine subjects had stable disease while the other two had progressive disease.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;These initial safety data do not reveal increased toxicity with the addition of ascorbic acid to gemcitabine and erlotinib in pancreatic cancer patients. This, combined with the observed response to treatment, suggests the need for a phase II study of longer duration.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00954525&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/hhvIzkJ0PrI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029794</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Brain Training Game Improves Executive Functions and Processing Speed in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/rtMNlpS9H98/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029676" title="Brain Training Game Improves Executive Functions and Processing Speed in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029676&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Brain Training Game Improves Executive Functions and Processing Speed in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029676&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Brain Training Game Improves Executive Functions and Processing Speed in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Rui Nouchi et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029676</id>
    <updated>2012-01-11T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-11T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Rui Nouchi, Yasuyuki Taki, Hikaru Takeuchi, Hiroshi Hashizume, Yuko Akitsuki, Yayoi Shigemune, Atsushi Sekiguchi, Yuka Kotozaki, Takashi Tsukiura, Yukihito Yomogida, Ryuta Kawashima&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The beneficial effects of brain training games are expected to transfer to other cognitive functions, but these beneficial effects are poorly understood. Here we investigate the impact of the brain training game (Brain Age) on cognitive functions in the elderly.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Results &lt;p&gt;Thirty-two elderly volunteers were recruited through an advertisement in the local newspaper and randomly assigned to either of two game groups (Brain Age, Tetris). This study was completed by 14 of the 16 members in the Brain Age group and 14 of the 16 members in the Tetris group. To maximize the benefit of the interventions, all participants were non-gamers who reported playing less than one hour of video games per week over the past 2 years. Participants in both the Brain Age and the Tetris groups played their game for about 15 minutes per day, at least 5 days per week, for 4 weeks. Each group played for a total of about 20 days. Measures of the cognitive functions were conducted before and after training. Measures of the cognitive functions fell into four categories (global cognitive status, executive functions, attention, and processing speed). Results showed that the effects of the brain training game were transferred to executive functions and to processing speed. However, the brain training game showed no transfer effect on any global cognitive status nor attention.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Our results showed that playing Brain Age for 4 weeks could lead to improve cognitive functions (executive functions and processing speed) in the elderly. This result indicated that there is a possibility which the elderly could improve executive functions and processing speed in short term training. The results need replication in large samples. Long-term effects and relevance for every-day functioning remain uncertain as yet.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;UMIN Clinical Trial Registry 000002825&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/rtMNlpS9H98" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029676</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Interleukin-1 Inhibition and Fatigue in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome – A Double Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/FnEPJxG--0w/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030123" title="Interleukin-1 Inhibition and Fatigue in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome – A Double Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030123&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Interleukin-1 Inhibition and Fatigue in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome – A Double Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030123&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Interleukin-1 Inhibition and Fatigue in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome – A Double Blind, Randomised Clinical Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Katrine Brække Norheim et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030123</id>
    <updated>2012-01-10T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-10T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Katrine Brække Norheim, Erna Harboe, Lasse G. Gøransson, Roald Omdal&lt;/p&gt;
Objectives &lt;p&gt;Fatigue is a major cause of disability in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). Fatigue has similarities with &lt;i&gt;sickness behaviour&lt;/i&gt; in animals; the latter mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines, in particular interleukin (IL)-1, acting on neuronal brain cells. We hypothesised that IL-1 inhibition might improve fatigue in pSS patients; thus, we examined the effects and safety of an IL-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) on fatigue.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;Twenty-six pSS patients participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study. Patients were randomised to receive either anakinra or a placebo for four weeks. Fatigue was evaluated by a fatigue visual analogue scale and the Fatigue Severity Scale. The primary outcome measure was a group-wise comparison of the fatigue scores at week 4, adjusted for baseline values. Secondary outcome measures included evaluation of laboratory results and safety. The proportion of patients in each group who experienced a 50% reduction in fatigue was regarded as a post-hoc outcome. All outcomes were measured at week 4.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;There was no significant difference between the groups in fatigue scores at week 4 compared to baseline after treatment with anakinra. However, six out of 12 patients on anakinra versus one out of 13 patients on the placebo reported a 50% reduction in fatigue VAS (p = 0.03). There were two serious adverse events in each group.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of IL-1 blockade did not find a significant reduction in fatigue in pSS in its primary endpoint. A 50% reduction in fatigue was analysed post-hoc, and significantly more patients on the active drug than on placebo reached this endpoint. Although not supported by the primary endpoint, this may indicate that IL-1 inhibition influences fatigue in patients with pSS.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00683345&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/FnEPJxG--0w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0030123</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Empirical Study of Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/_nktxCOIsGA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028820" title="Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Empirical Study of Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028820&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Empirical Study of Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028820&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Empirical Study of Trials Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov" />
    <author>
      <name>Florence T. Bourgeois et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028820</id>
    <updated>2012-01-09T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-09T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Florence T. Bourgeois, Srinivas Murthy, Kenneth D. Mandl&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The $1.1 billion investment in comparative effectiveness research will reshape the evidence-base supporting decisions about treatment effectiveness, safety, and cost. Defining the current prevalence and characteristics of comparative effectiveness (CE) research will enable future assessments of the impact of this program.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We conducted an observational study of clinical trials addressing priority research topics defined by the Institute of Medicine and conducted in the US between 2007 and 2010. Trials were identified in ClinicalTrials.gov. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of comparative effectiveness research, nature of comparators selected, funding sources, and impact of these factors on results.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;231 (22.3%; 95% CI 19.8%–24.9%) studies were CE studies and 804 (77.7%; 95% CI, 75.1%–80.2%) were non-CE studies, with 379 (36.6%; 95% CI, 33.7%–39.6%) employing a placebo control and 425 (41.1%; 95% CI, 38.1%–44.1%) no control. The most common treatments examined in CE studies were drug interventions (37.2%), behavioral interventions (28.6%), and procedures (15.6%). Study findings were favorable for the experimental treatment in 34.8% of CE studies and greater than twice as many (78.6%) non-CE studies (P&lt;0.001). CE studies were more likely to receive government funding (P = 0.003) and less likely to receive industry funding (P = 0.01), with 71.8% of CE studies primarily funded by a noncommercial source. The types of interventions studied differed based on funding source, with 95.4% of industry trials studying a drug or device. In addition, industry-funded CE studies were associated with the fewest pediatric subjects (P&lt;0.001), the largest anticipated sample size (P&lt;0.001), and the shortest study duration (P&lt;0.001).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;In this sample of studies examining high priority areas for CE research, less than a quarter are CE studies and the majority is supported by government and nonprofits. The low prevalence of CE research exists across CE studies with a broad array of interventions and characteristics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/_nktxCOIsGA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028820</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>An Educational and Physical Program to Reduce Headache, Neck/Shoulder Pain in a Working Community: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/D6C9dmNVGqE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029637" title="An Educational and Physical Program to Reduce Headache, Neck/Shoulder Pain in a Working Community: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029637&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) An Educational and Physical Program to Reduce Headache, Neck/Shoulder Pain in a Working Community: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029637&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) An Educational and Physical Program to Reduce Headache, Neck/Shoulder Pain in a Working Community: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Franco Mongini et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029637</id>
    <updated>2012-01-09T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-09T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Franco Mongini, Andrea Evangelista, Chantal Milani, Luca Ferrero, Giovannino Ciccone, Alessandro Ugolini, Alessandro Piedimonte, Monica Sigaudo, Elisa Carlino, Emanuela Banzatti, Claudia Galassi&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Noninvasive physical management is often prescribed for headache and neck pain. Systematic reviews, however, indicate that the evidence of its efficacy is limited. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of a workplace educational and physical program in reducing headache and neck/shoulder pain.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;Cluster-randomized controlled trial. All municipal workers of the City of Turin, Italy, were invited to participate. Those who agreed were randomly assigned, according to their departments, to the intervention group (IG) or to the control group and were given diaries for the daily recording of pain episodes for 1 month (baseline). Subsequently, only the IG (119 departments, 923 workers) began the physical and educational program, whereas the control group (117 departments, 990 workers) did not receive any intervention. All participants were again given diaries for the daily recording of pain episodes after 6 months of intervention. The primary outcome was the change in the frequency of headache (expressed as the proportion of subjects with a ≥50% reduction of frequency; responder rate); among the secondary outcomes there were the absolute reduction of the number of days per month with headache and neck/shoulder pain. Differences between the two groups were evaluated using mixed-effect regression models. The IG showed a higher responder rate [risk ratio, 95% confidence interval (CI)] for headache (1.58; 1.28 to 1.92) and for neck/shoulder pain (1.53; 1.27 to 1.82), and a larger reduction of the days per month (95% CI) with headache (−1.72; −2.40 to −1.04) and with neck/shoulder pain (−2.51; −3.56 to −1.47).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;The program effectively reduced headache and neck/shoulder pain in a large working community and appears to be easily transferable to primary-care settings. Further trials are needed to investigate the program effectiveness in a clinical setting, for highly selected patients suffering from specific headache types.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00551980&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/D6C9dmNVGqE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029637</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Dense Cranial Electroacupuncture Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder—A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/NO1JOkvlagI/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029651" title="Dense Cranial Electroacupuncture Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder—A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029651&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Dense Cranial Electroacupuncture Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder—A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029651&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Dense Cranial Electroacupuncture Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder—A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study" />
    <author>
      <name>Zhang-Jin Zhang et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0029651</id>
    <updated>2012-01-06T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-06T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Zhang-Jin Zhang, Roger Ng, Sui Cheung Man, Tsui Yin Jade Li, Wendy Wong, Qing-Rong Tan, Hei Kiu Wong, Ka-Fai Chung, Man-Tak Wong, Wai-Kiu Alfert Tsang, Ka-chee Yip, Eric Ziea, Vivian Taam Wong&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Previous studies suggest that electroacupuncture possesses therapeutic benefits for depressive disorders. The purpose of this study was to determine whether dense cranial electroacupuncture stimulation (DCEAS) could enhance the antidepressant efficacy in the early phase of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;In this single-blind, randomized, controlled study, patients with MDD were randomly assigned to 9-session DCEAS or noninvasive electroacupuncture (n-EA) control procedure in combination with fluoxetine (FLX) for 3 weeks. Clinical outcomes were measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S), and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) as well as the response and remission rates.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Seventy-three patients were randomly assigned to n-EA (n = 35) and DCEAS (n = 38), of whom 34 in n-EA and 36 in DCEAS group were analyzed. DCEAS-treated patients displayed a significantly greater reduction from baseline in HAMD-17 scores at Day 3 through Day 21 and in SDS scores at Day 3 and Day 21 compared to patients receiving n-EA. DCEAS intervention also produced a higher rate of clinically significant response compared to n-EA procedure (19.4% (7/36) vs. 8.8% (3/34)). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;DCEAS is a safe and effective intervention that augments the antidepressant efficacy. It can be considered as an additional therapy in the early phase of SSRI treatment of depressed patients.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN88008690&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/NO1JOkvlagI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029651</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Low Efficacy of Single-Dose Albendazole and Mebendazole against Hookworm and Effect on Concomitant Helminth Infection in Lao PDR</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/kHYV3hFEgRo/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0001417" title="Low Efficacy of Single-Dose Albendazole and Mebendazole against Hookworm and Effect on Concomitant Helminth Infection in Lao PDR" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001417&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Low Efficacy of Single-Dose Albendazole and Mebendazole against Hookworm and Effect on Concomitant Helminth Infection in Lao PDR" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001417&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Low Efficacy of Single-Dose Albendazole and Mebendazole against Hookworm and Effect on Concomitant Helminth Infection in Lao PDR" />
    <author>
      <name>Phonepasong Ayé Soukhathammavong et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001417</id>
    <updated>2012-01-03T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2012-01-03T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Phonepasong Ayé Soukhathammavong, Somphou Sayasone, Khampheng Phongluxa, Vilavanh Xayaseng, Jürg Utzinger, Penelope Vounatsou, Christoph Hatz, Kongsap Akkhavong, Jennifer Keiser, Peter Odermatt&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Albendazole and mebendazole are increasingly deployed for preventive chemotherapy targeting soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections. We assessed the efficacy of single oral doses of albendazole (400 mg) and mebendazole (500 mg) for the treatment of hookworm infection in school-aged children in Lao PDR. Since &lt;i&gt;Opisthorchis viverrini&lt;/i&gt; is co-endemic in our study setting, the effect of the two drugs could also be determined against this liver fluke.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology &lt;p&gt;We conducted a randomized, open-label, two-arm trial. In total, 200 children infected with hookworm (determined by quadruplicate Kato-Katz thick smears derived from two stool samples) were randomly assigned to albendazole (n = 100) and mebendazole (n = 100). Cure rate (CR; percentage of children who became egg-negative after treatment), and egg reduction rate (ERR; reduction in the geometric mean fecal egg count at treatment follow-up compared to baseline) at 21–23 days posttreatment were used as primary outcome measures. Adverse events were monitored 3 hours post treatment.&lt;/p&gt; Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;Single-dose albendazole and mebendazole resulted in CRs of 36.0% and 17.6% (odds ratio: 0.4; 95% confidence interval: 0.2–0.8; &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt; = 0.01), and ERRs of 86.7% and 76.3%, respectively. In children co-infected with &lt;i&gt;O. viverrini&lt;/i&gt;, albendazole and mebendazole showed low CRs (33.3% and 24.2%, respectively) and moderate ERRs (82.1% and 78.2%, respectively).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;Both albendazole and mebendazole showed disappointing CRs against hookworm, but albendazole cured infection and reduced intensity of infection with a higher efficacy than mebendazole. Single-dose administrations showed an effect against &lt;i&gt;O. viverrini&lt;/i&gt;, and hence it will be interesting to monitor potential ancillary benefits of a preventive chemotherapy strategy that targets STHs in areas where opisthorchiasis is co-endemic.&lt;/p&gt; Clinical Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN29126001&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/kHYV3hFEgRo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0001417</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Disclosure of Investigators' Recruitment Performance in Multicenter Clinical Trials: A Further Step for Research Transparency</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/vFbzAHcxriA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001149" title="Disclosure of Investigators' Recruitment Performance in Multicenter Clinical Trials: A Further Step for Research Transparency" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001149&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Disclosure of Investigators' Recruitment Performance in Multicenter Clinical Trials: A Further Step for Research Transparency" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001149&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Disclosure of Investigators' Recruitment Performance in Multicenter Clinical Trials: A Further Step for Research Transparency" />
    <author>
      <name>Rafael Dal-Ré et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001149</id>
    <updated>2011-12-27T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-27T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Rafael Dal-Ré, David Moher, Christian Gluud, Shaun Treweek, Jacques Demotes-Mainard, Xavier Carné&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/vFbzAHcxriA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001149</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Randomized Controlled Trials of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment in Africa: Results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/oaSyrkZ0HlA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028759" title="Randomized Controlled Trials of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment in Africa: Results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028759&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Randomized Controlled Trials of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment in Africa: Results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028759&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Randomized Controlled Trials of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Treatment in Africa: Results from the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register" />
    <author>
      <name>Babalwa Zani et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028759</id>
    <updated>2011-12-15T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-15T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Babalwa Zani, Elizabeth D. Pienaar, Joy Oliver, Nandi Siegfried&lt;/p&gt;
Introduction &lt;p&gt;To effectively address HIV/AIDS in Africa, evidence on preventing new infections and providing effective treatment is needed. Ideally, decisions on which interventions are effective should be based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our previous research described African RCTs of HIV/AIDS reported between 1987 and 2003. This study updates that analysis with RCTs published between 2004 and 2008.&lt;/p&gt; Objectives &lt;p&gt;To describe RCTs of HIV/AIDS conducted in Africa and reported between 2004 and 2008.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We searched the Cochrane HIV/AIDS Specialized Register in September 2009. Two researchers independently evaluated studies for inclusion and extracted data using standardized forms. Details included location of trials, interventions, methodological quality, location of principal investigators and funders.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Our search identified 834 RCTs, with 68 conducted in Africa. Forty-three assessed prevention-interventions and 25 treatment-interventions. Fifteen of the 43 prevention RCTs focused on preventing mother-to-child HIV transmission. Thirteen of the 25 treatment trials focused on opportunistic infections. Trials were conducted in 16 countries with most in South Africa (20), Zambia (12) and Zimbabwe (9). The median sample size was 628 (range 33-9645). Methods used for the generation of the allocation sequence and allocation concealment were adequate in 38 and 32 trials, respectively, and 58 reports included a CONSORT recommended flow diagram. Twenty-nine principal investigators resided in the United States of America (USA) and 18 were from African countries. Trials were co-funded by different agencies with most of the funding obtained from USA governmental and non-governmental agencies. Nineteen pharmaceutical companies provided partial funding to 15 RCTs and African agencies co-funded 17 RCTs. Ethical approval was reported in 65 trials and informed consent in 61 trials.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;Prevention trials dominate the trial landscape in Africa. Of note, few principal investigators and funders are from Africa. These findings mirror our previous work and continue to indicate a need for strengthening trial research capacity in Africa.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/oaSyrkZ0HlA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028759</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Absorbable Versus Silk Sutures for Surgical Treatment of Trachomatous Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/zTyTyDJWa_E/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001137" title="Absorbable Versus Silk Sutures for Surgical Treatment of Trachomatous Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001137&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Absorbable Versus Silk Sutures for Surgical Treatment of Trachomatous Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001137&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Absorbable Versus Silk Sutures for Surgical Treatment of Trachomatous Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Saul N. Rajak et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001137</id>
    <updated>2011-12-13T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-13T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Saul N. Rajak, Esmael Habtamu, Helen A. Weiss, Amir Bedri Kello, Teshome Gebre, Asrat Genet, Robin L. Bailey, David C. W. Mabey, Peng T. Khaw, Clare E. Gilbert, Paul M. Emerson, Matthew J. Burton&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Trachoma causes blindness through an anatomical abnormality called trichiasis (lashes touching the eye). Trichiasis can recur after corrective surgery. We tested the hypothesis that using absorbable sutures instead of silk sutures might reduce the risk of recurrent disease among patients with major trichiasis in a randomised trial.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;1,300 individuals with major trichiasis from rural villages in the Amhara Region of Ethiopia were recruited and assigned (1∶1) by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive trichiasis surgery using either an absorbable suture (polyglactin-910) or silk sutures (removed at 7–10 days) in an otherwise identical surgical technique. Participants were examined every 6 months for 2 years by clinicians masked to allocation. The primary outcome measure was recurrent trichiasis (≥one lash touching the eye) at 1 year. There was no difference in prevalence of recurrent trichiasis at 1 year (114 [18.2%] in the absorbable suture group versus 120 [19.7%] in the silk suture group; odds ratio = 0.90, 95% CI 0.68–1.20). The two groups also did not differ in terms of corneal opacification, visual acuity, conjunctival inflammation, and surgical complications.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;There was no evidence that use of absorbable polyglactin-910 sutures was associated with a lower prevalence of trichiasis recurrence at 1 year postsurgery than silk sutures. However, from a programmatic perspective, polyglactin-910 offers the major advantage that patients do not have to be seen soon after surgery for suture removal. The postoperative review after surgery using absorbable polyglactin-910 sutures can be delayed for 3–6 months, which might allow us to better determine whether a patient needs additional surgery.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00522860&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/zTyTyDJWa_E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001137</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Surgery Versus Epilation for the Treatment of Minor Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/JUCWRxut7NY/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001136" title="Surgery Versus Epilation for the Treatment of Minor Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001136&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Surgery Versus Epilation for the Treatment of Minor Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001136&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Surgery Versus Epilation for the Treatment of Minor Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Saul N. Rajak et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001136</id>
    <updated>2011-12-13T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-13T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Saul N. Rajak, Esmael Habtamu, Helen A. Weiss, Amir Bedri Kello, Teshome Gebre, Asrat Genet, Robin L. Bailey, David C. W. Mabey, Peng T. Khaw, Clare E. Gilbert, Paul M. Emerson, Matthew J. Burton&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Trachomatous trichiasis can cause corneal damage and visual impairment. WHO recommends surgery for all cases. However, in many regions surgical provision is inadequate and patients frequently decline. Self-epilation is common and was associated with comparable outcomes to surgery in nonrandomised studies for minor trichiasis (&lt;six lashes touching eye). This trial investigated whether epilation is noninferior to surgery for managing minor trichiasis.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;1,300 individuals with minor trichiasis from Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia were recruited and randomly assigned (1∶1) to receive trichiasis surgery or epilation. The epilation group were given new forceps and epilation training. The surgical group received trichiasis surgery. Participants were examined every 6 months for 2 years by clinicians masked to allocation, with 93.5% follow-up at 24 months. The primary outcome measure (“failure”) was ≥five lashes touching the eye or receiving trichiasis surgery during 24 months of follow-up, and was assessed for noninferiority with a 10% prespecified noninferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included number of lashes touching, time to failure, and changes in visual acuity and corneal opacity.Cumulative risk of failure over 24 months was 13.2% in the epilation group and 2.2% in the surgical group (risk difference = 11%). The 95% confidence interval (8.1%–13.9%) includes the 10% noninferiority margin. Mean number of lashes touching the eye was greater in the epilation group than the surgery group (at 24 months 0.95 versus 0.09, respectively; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001); there was no difference in change in visual acuity or corneal opacity between the two groups.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;This trial was inconclusive regarding inferiority of epilation to surgery for the treatment of minor trichiasis, relative to the prespecified margin. Epilation had a comparable effect to surgery on visual acuity and corneal outcomes. We suggest that surgery be performed whenever possible but epilation be used for treatment of minor trichiasis patients without access to or declining surgery.&lt;/p&gt; Trial registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00522912&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/JUCWRxut7NY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001136</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/vYFf41E8UAs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028696" title="Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028696&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028696&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Chinese Herbal Medicines: An Overview" />
    <author>
      <name>Jing Hu et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028696</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-09T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jing Hu, Junhua Zhang, Wei Zhao, Yongling Zhang, Li Zhang, Hongcai Shang&lt;/p&gt;
Objectives &lt;p&gt;Our study had two objectives: a) to systematically identify all existing systematic reviews of Chinese herbal medicines (CHM) published in Cochrane Library; b) to assess the methodological quality of included reviews.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We performed a systematic search of &lt;i&gt;the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews&lt;/i&gt; (CDSR, Issue 5, 2010) to identify all reviews of CHM. A total of fifty-eight reviews were eligible for our study. Twenty-one of the included reviews had at least one Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) practitioner as its co-author. 7 reviews didn't include any primary study, the remaining reviews (n = 51) included a median of 9 studies and 936 participants. 50% of reviews were last assessed as up-to-date prior to 2008. The questions addressed by 39 reviews were broad in scope, in which 9 reviews combined studies with different herbal medicines. For OQAQ, the mean of overall quality score (item 10) was 5.05 (95% CI; 4.58-5.52). All reviews assessed the methodological quality of primary studies, 16% of included primary studies used adequate sequence generation and 7% used adequate allocation concealment. Of the 51 nonempty reviews, 23 reviews were reported as being inconclusive, while 27 concluded that there might be benefit of CHM, which was limited by the poor quality or inadequate quantity of included studies. 58 reviews reported searching a median of seven electronic databases, while 10 reviews did not search any Chinese database.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Now CDSR has included large numbers of CHM reviews, our study identified some areas which could be improved, such as almost half of included reviews did not have the participation of TCM practitioners and were not up-to-date according to Cochrane criteria, some reviews pooled the results of different herbal medicines and ignored the searching of Chinese databases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/vYFf41E8UAs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028696</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Effects of Cognitive Therapy versus ‘No Intervention’ for Major Depressive Disorder</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/FUlZTxYoZh0/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028299" title="The Effects of Cognitive Therapy versus ‘No Intervention’ for Major Depressive Disorder" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028299&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) The Effects of Cognitive Therapy versus ‘No Intervention’ for Major Depressive Disorder" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028299&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) The Effects of Cognitive Therapy versus ‘No Intervention’ for Major Depressive Disorder" />
    <author>
      <name>Janus Christian Jakobsen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028299</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-09T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Janus Christian Jakobsen, Jane Lindschou Hansen, Ole Jakob Storebø, Erik Simonsen, Christian Gluud&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Major depressive disorder afflicts an estimated 17% of individuals during their lifetimes at tremendous suffering and costs. Cognitive therapy may be an effective treatment option for major depressive disorder, but the effects have only had limited assessment in systematic reviews.&lt;/p&gt; Methods/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We used The Cochrane systematic review methodology with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized trials comparing the effects of cognitive therapy versus ‘no intervention’ for major depressive disorder. Participants had to be older than 17 years with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder to be eligible. Altogether, we included 12 trials randomizing a total of 669 participants. All 12 trials had high risk of bias. Meta-analysis on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression showed that cognitive therapy significantly reduced depressive symptoms (four trials; mean difference −3.05 (95% confidence interval (Cl), −5.23 to −0.87; P&lt;0.006)) compared with ‘no intervention’. Trial sequential analysis could not confirm this result. Meta-analysis on the Beck Depression Inventory showed that cognitive therapy significantly reduced depressive symptoms (eight trials; mean difference on −4.86 (95% CI −6.44 to −3.28; P = 0.00001)). Trial sequential analysis on these data confirmed the result. Only a few trials reported on ‘no remission’, suicide inclination, suicide attempts, suicides, and adverse events without significant differences between the compared intervention groups.&lt;/p&gt; Discussion &lt;p&gt;Cognitive therapy might be an effective treatment for depression measured on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Beck Depression Inventory, but these outcomes may be overestimated due to risks of systematic errors (bias) and random errors (play of chance). Furthermore, the effects of cognitive therapy on no remission, suicidality, adverse events, and quality of life are unclear. There is a need for randomized trials with low risk of bias, low risk of random errors, and longer follow-up assessing both benefits and harms with clinically relevant outcome measures.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/FUlZTxYoZh0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028299</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/CL0djYixi_c/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028130" title="Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028130&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028130&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Risk of Bias Tool in Systematic Reviews/Meta-Analyses of Acupuncture in Chinese Journals" />
    <author>
      <name>Yali Liu et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028130</id>
    <updated>2011-12-09T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-09T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Yali Liu, Shengping Yang, Junjie Dai, Yongteng Xu, Rui Zhang, Huaili Jiang, Xianxia Yan, Kehu Yang&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Use of a risk of bias (ROB) tool has been encouraged and advocated to reviewers writing systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs). Selective outcome reporting and other sources of bias are included in the Cochrane ROB tool. It is important to know how this specific tool for assessing ROB has been applied since its release. Our objectives were to evaluate whether and to what extent the new Cochrane ROB tool has been used in Chinese journal papers of acupuncture.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We searched CBM, TCM database, CJFD, CSJD, and the Wanfang Database from inception to March 2011. Two reviewers independently selected SRs that primarily focused on acupuncture and moxibustion, from which the data was extracted and analyzed.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;A total of 836 SRs were identified from the search, of which, 105 were included and four are awaiting assessment. Thirty-six of the 105 SRs were published before release of the Cochrane ROB tool (up to 2009). Most used the Cochrane Handbook 4.2 or Jadad's scale for risk or quality assessment. From 2009 to March 2011 69 SRs were identified. While “risk of bias” was reported for approximately two-thirds of SRs, only two SRs mentioned use of a “risk of bias tool” in their assessment. Only 5.8% (4/69) of reviews reported information on all six domains which are involved in the ROB tool. A risk of bias graph/summary figure was provided in 2.9% (2/69) of reviews. Most SRs gave information about sequence generation, allocation concealment, blindness, and incomplete outcome data, however, few reviews (5.8%; 4/69) described selective reporting or other potential sources of bias.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;The Cochrane “risk of bias” tool has not been used in all SRs/MAs of acupuncture published in Chinese Journals after 2008. When the ROB tool was used, reporting of relevant information was often incomplete.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/CL0djYixi_c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028130</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Two-Way Minimization: A Novel Treatment Allocation Method for Small Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/QcJFniPeT1M/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028604" title="Two-Way Minimization: A Novel Treatment Allocation Method for Small Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028604&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Two-Way Minimization: A Novel Treatment Allocation Method for Small Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028604&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Two-Way Minimization: A Novel Treatment Allocation Method for Small Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Lan-Hsin Chen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028604</id>
    <updated>2011-12-07T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-07T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Lan-Hsin Chen, Wen-Chung Lee&lt;/p&gt;

        Randomization is a hallmark of clinical trials. If a trial entails very few subjects and has many prognostic factors (or many factor levels) to be balanced, minimization is a more efficient method to achieve balance than a simple randomization. We propose a novel minimization method, the ‘two-way minimization’. The method separately calculates the ‘imbalance in the total numbers of subjects’ and the ‘imbalance in the distributions of prognostic factors’. And then to allocate a subject, it chooses—by probability—to minimize either one of these two aspects of imbalances. As such, it is a method that is both treatment-adaptive and covariate-adaptive. We perform Monte-Carlo simulations to examine its statistical properties. The two-way minimization (with proper regression adjustment of the force-balanced prognostic factors) has the correct type I error rates. It also produces point estimates that are unbiased and variance estimates that are accurate. When there are important prognostic factors to be balanced in the study, the method achieves the highest power and the smallest variance among randomization methods that are resistant to selection bias. The allocation can be done in real time and the subsequent data analysis is straightforward. The two-way minimization is recommended to balance prognostic factors in small trials.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/QcJFniPeT1M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028604</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/uflUt4oTG8E/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028422" title="Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028422&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028422&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Statistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews" />
    <author>
      <name>Georgina Imberger et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028422</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-02T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Georgina Imberger, Alexandra Damgaard Vejlby, Sara Bohnstedt Hansen, Ann M. Møller, Jørn Wetterslev&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Systematic reviews with meta-analyses often contain many statistical tests. This multiplicity may increase the risk of type I error. Few attempts have been made to address the problem of statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews. Before the implications are properly considered, the size of the issue deserves clarification. Because of the emphasis on bias evaluation and because of the editorial processes involved, Cochrane reviews may contain more multiplicity than their non-Cochrane counterparts. This study measured the quantity of statistical multiplicity present in a population of systematic reviews and aimed to assess whether this quantity is different in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews.&lt;/p&gt; Methods/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We selected all the systematic reviews published by the Cochrane Anaesthesia Review Group containing a meta-analysis and matched them with comparable non-Cochrane reviews. We counted the number of statistical tests done in each systematic review. The median number of tests overall was 10 (interquartile range (IQR) 6 to 18). The median was 12 in Cochrane and 8 in non-Cochrane reviews (difference in medians 4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0–19.0). The proportion that used an assessment of risk of bias as a reason for doing extra analyses was 42% in Cochrane and 28% in non-Cochrane reviews (difference in proportions 14% (95% CI −8 to 36). The issue of multiplicity was addressed in 6% of all the reviews.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion/Significance &lt;p&gt;Statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews requires attention. We found more multiplicity in Cochrane reviews than in non-Cochrane reviews. Many of the reasons for the increase in multiplicity may well represent improved methodological approaches and greater transparency, but multiplicity may also cause an increased risk of spurious conclusions. Few systematic reviews, whether Cochrane or non-Cochrane, address the issue of multiplicity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/uflUt4oTG8E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028422</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Chinese Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Type A H1N1 Influenza: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/YsQs4hLxyfE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028093" title="Chinese Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Type A H1N1 Influenza: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028093&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Chinese Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Type A H1N1 Influenza: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028093&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Chinese Herbal Medicines for the Treatment of Type A H1N1 Influenza: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Wei Chen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028093</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-02T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Wei Chen, Chi Eung Danforn Lim, Hong-Jun Kang, Jianping Liu&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Chinese herbs are thought to be effective for type A H1N1 influenza. Series of Chinese herbs have been authorized recommended by the Chinese government, and until now a number of clinical trials of Chinese herbs for H1N1 influenza have been conducted. However, there is no critically appraised evidence such as systematic reviews or meta-analyses on potential benefits and harms of medicinal herbs for H1N1 influenza to justify their clinical use and their recommendation.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, VIP, China Important Conference Papers Database, China Dissertation Database, and online clinical trial registry websites were searched for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Chinese herbs for H1N1 influenza till 31 August, 2011. A total of 26 RCTs were identified and reviewed. Most of the RCTs were of high risk of bias with flawed study design and poor methodological quality. The combination of several Chinese herbal medicines with or without oseltamivir demonstrated positive effect on fever resolution, relief of symptoms, and global effectiveness rate compared to oseltamivir alone. However, only one herbal medicine showed positive effect on viral shedding. Most of the trials did not report adverse events, and the safety of herbal medicines is still uncertain.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Some Chinese herbal medicines demonstrated potential positive effect for 2009 type A H1N1 influenza; however, due to the lack of placebo controlled trial and lack of repeated test of the intervention, we could not draw confirmative conclusions on the beneficial effect of Chinese herbs for H1N1 influenza. More rigorous trials are warranted to support their clinical use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/YsQs4hLxyfE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028093</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Publication Delay of Randomized Trials on 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccination</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/4ckNmcK5Zvs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028346" title="Publication Delay of Randomized Trials on 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccination" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028346&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Publication Delay of Randomized Trials on 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccination" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028346&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Publication Delay of Randomized Trials on 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Vaccination" />
    <author>
      <name>John P. A. Ioannidis et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028346</id>
    <updated>2011-12-02T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-12-02T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by John P. A. Ioannidis, Lamberto Manzoli, Corrado De Vito, Maddalena D'Addario, Paolo Villari&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Randomized evidence for vaccine immunogenicity and safety is urgently needed in the setting of pandemics with new emerging infectious agents. We carried out an observational survey to evaluate how many randomized controlled trials testing 2009 H1N1 vaccines were published among those registered, and what was the time lag from their start to publication and from their completion to publication.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;PubMed, EMBASE and 9 clinical trial registries were searched for eligible randomized controlled trials. The units of the analysis were single randomized trials on any individual receiving influenza vaccines in any setting.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;73 eligible trials were identified that had been registered in 2009–2010. By June 30, 2011 only 21 (29%) of these trials had been published, representing 38% of the randomized sample size (19905 of 52765). Trials starting later were published less rapidly (hazard ratio 0.42 per month; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.27 to 0.64; p&lt;0.001). Similarly, trials completed later were published less rapidly (hazard ratio 0.43 per month; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.67; p&lt;0.001). Randomized controlled trials were completed promptly (median, 5 months from start to completion), but only a minority were subsequently published.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Most registered randomized trials on vaccines for the H1N1 pandemic are not published in the peer-reviewed literature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/4ckNmcK5Zvs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028346</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Internet-Based CBT for Depression with and without Telephone Tracking in a National Helpline: Randomised Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/oQrihcYo5SU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028099" title="Internet-Based CBT for Depression with and without Telephone Tracking in a National Helpline: Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028099&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Internet-Based CBT for Depression with and without Telephone Tracking in a National Helpline: Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028099&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Internet-Based CBT for Depression with and without Telephone Tracking in a National Helpline: Randomised Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Louise Farrer et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028099</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-30T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Louise Farrer, Helen Christensen, Kathleen M. Griffiths, Andrew Mackinnon&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Telephone helplines are frequently and repeatedly used by individuals with chronic mental health problems and web interventions may be an effective tool for reducing depression in this population.&lt;/p&gt; Aim &lt;p&gt;To evaluate the effectiveness of a 6 week, web-based cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) intervention with and without proactive weekly telephone tracking in the reduction of depression in callers to a helpline service.&lt;/p&gt; Method &lt;p&gt;155 callers to a national helpline service with moderate to high psychological distress were recruited and randomised to receive either Internet CBT plus weekly telephone follow-up; Internet CBT only; weekly telephone follow-up only; or treatment as usual.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Depression was lower in participants in the web intervention conditions both with and without telephone tracking compared to the treatment as usual condition both at post intervention and at 6 month follow-up. Telephone tracking provided by a lay telephone counsellor did not confer any additional advantage in terms of symptom reduction or adherence.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;A web-based CBT program is effective both with and without telephone tracking for reducing depression in callers to a national helpline.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN93903959&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/oQrihcYo5SU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028099</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Tolerance and Safety Evaluation in a Large Cohort of Healthy Infants Fed an Innovative Prebiotic Formula: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/4Xq1K8FMMfM/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028010" title="Tolerance and Safety Evaluation in a Large Cohort of Healthy Infants Fed an Innovative Prebiotic Formula: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028010&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Tolerance and Safety Evaluation in a Large Cohort of Healthy Infants Fed an Innovative Prebiotic Formula: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028010&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Tolerance and Safety Evaluation in a Large Cohort of Healthy Infants Fed an Innovative Prebiotic Formula: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Pasqua Piemontese et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>for the MIPS 1 Working Group Berlin, Frankfurt (Oder), and Friedrichsdorf, Germany, Groningen, The Netherlands, Milan and Brescia, Italy, Zurich, Switzerland, and Schwarzach, Austria</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028010</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-30T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Pasqua Piemontese, Maria L. Giannì, Christian P. Braegger, Gaetano Chirico, Christoph Grüber, Josef Riedler, Sertac Arslanoglu, Margriet van Stuijvenberg, Günther Boehm, Jürgen Jelinek, Paola Roggero, for the MIPS 1 Working Group Berlin, Frankfurt (Oder), and Friedrichsdorf, Germany, Groningen, The Netherlands, Milan and Brescia, Italy, Zurich, Switzerland, and Schwarzach, Austria&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;the addition of oligosaccharides to infant formula has been shown to mimic some of the beneficial effects of human milk. The aim of the study was to assess the tolerance and safety of a formula containing an innovative mixture of oligosaccharides in early infancy.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;this study was performed as a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including healthy term infants. Infants were recruited before the age of 8 weeks, either having started with formula feeding or being fully breast-fed (breastfeeding group). Formula-fed infants were randomized to feeding with a regular formula containing a mixture of neutral oligosaccharides and pectin-derived acidic oligosaccharides (prebiotic formula group) or regular formula without oligosaccharides (control formula group). Growth, tolerance and adverse events were assessed at 8, 16, 24 and 52 weeks of age. The prebiotic and control groups showed similar mean weight, length and head circumference, skin fold thicknesses, arm circumference gains and stool frequency at each study point. As far as the anthropometric parameters are concerned, the prebiotic group and the control group did not attain the values shown by the breastfeeding group at any study point. The skin fold thicknesses assessed in the breastfeeding group at 8 weeks were strikingly larger than those in formula fed infants, whereas at 52 weeks were strikingly smaller. The stool consistency in the prebiotic group was softer than in the control group at 8, 16 and 24 weeks (p&lt;0.001) and closer to that of the breastfeeding group. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two formula groups.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;our findings demonstrate the tolerability and the long term safety of a formula containing an innovative mixture of oligosaccharides in a large cohort of healthy infants.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration: &lt;p&gt;drks-neu.uniklinik-freiburg.de DRKS 00000201&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/4Xq1K8FMMfM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028010</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Cluster-Randomised Trial of Staff Education to Improve the Quality of Life of People with Dementia Living in Residential Care: The DIRECT Study</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/iL-2FXQAmew/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028155" title="A Cluster-Randomised Trial of Staff Education to Improve the Quality of Life of People with Dementia Living in Residential Care: The DIRECT Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028155&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) A Cluster-Randomised Trial of Staff Education to Improve the Quality of Life of People with Dementia Living in Residential Care: The DIRECT Study" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028155&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) A Cluster-Randomised Trial of Staff Education to Improve the Quality of Life of People with Dementia Living in Residential Care: The DIRECT Study" />
    <author>
      <name>Christopher Beer et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0028155</id>
    <updated>2011-11-30T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-30T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Christopher Beer, Barbara Horner, Leon Flicker, Samuel Scherer, Nicola T. Lautenschlager, Nick Bretland, Penelope Flett, Frank Schaper, Osvaldo P. Almeida&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Dementia In Residential care: EduCation intervention Trial&lt;/i&gt; (DIRECT) was conducted to determine if delivery of education designed to meet the perceived need of GPs and care staff improves the quality of life of participants with dementia living in residential care.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;This cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in 39 residential aged care facilities in the metropolitan area of Perth, Western Australia. 351 care facility residents aged 65 years and older with Mini-Mental State Examination ≤24, their GPs and facility staff participated. Flexible education designed to meet the perceived needs of learners was delivered to GPs and care facility staff in intervention groups. The primary outcome of the study was self-rated quality of life of participants with dementia, measured using the QOL-Alzheimer's Disease Scale (QOL-AD) at 4 weeks and 6 months after the conclusion of the intervention. Analysis accounted for the effect of clustering by using multi-level regression analysis. Education of GPs or care facility staff did not affect the primary outcome at either 4 weeks or 6 months. In a &lt;i&gt;post hoc&lt;/i&gt; analysis excluding facilities in which fewer than 50% of staff attended an education session, self-rated QOL-AD scores were 6.14 points (adjusted 95%CI 1.14, 11.15) higher at four-week follow-up among residents in facilities randomly assigned to the education intervention.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;The education intervention directed at care facilities or GPs did not improve the quality of life ratings of participants with dementia as a group. This may be explained by the poor adherence to the intervention programme, as participants with dementia living in facilities where staff participated at least minimally seemed to benefit.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ANZCTR.org.au ACTRN12607000417482&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/iL-2FXQAmew" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0028155</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Feasibility of Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Infusion for Flexible Bronchoscopy Sedation: A Randomized Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/oHUvCQewFek/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027769" title="Feasibility of Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Infusion for Flexible Bronchoscopy Sedation: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027769&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Feasibility of Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Infusion for Flexible Bronchoscopy Sedation: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027769&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Feasibility of Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Infusion for Flexible Bronchoscopy Sedation: A Randomized Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Yu-Lun Lo et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027769</id>
    <updated>2011-11-23T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-23T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Yu-Lun Lo, Ting-Yu Lin, Yueh-Fu Fang, Tsai-Yu Wang, Hao-Cheng Chen, Chun-Liang Chou, Fu-Tsai Chung, Chih-Hsi Kuo, Po-Hao Feng, Chien-Ying Liu, Han-Pin Kuo&lt;/p&gt;
Objectives &lt;p&gt;There are safety issues associated with propofol use for flexible bronchoscopy (FB). The bispectral index (BIS) correlates well with the level of consciousness. The aim of this study was to show that BIS-guided propofol infusion is safe and may provide better sedation, benefiting the patients and bronchoscopists.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;After administering alfentanil bolus, 500 patients were randomized to either propofol infusion titrated to a BIS level of 65-75 (study group) or incremental midazolam bolus based on clinical judgment to achieve moderate sedation. The primary endpoint was safety, while the secondary endpoints were recovery time, patient tolerance, and cooperation.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;The proportion of patients with hypoxemia or hypotensive events were not different in the 2 groups (study vs. control groups: 39.9% vs. 35.7%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.340; 7.4% vs. 4.4%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.159, respectively). The mean lowest blood pressure was lower in the study group. Logistic regression revealed male gender, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and electrocautery were associated with hypoxemia, whereas lower propofol dose for induction was associated with hypotension in the study group. The study group had better global tolerance (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001), less procedural interference by movement or cough (13.6% vs. 36.1%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001; 30.0% vs. 44.2%, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001, respectively), and shorter time to orientation and ambulation (11.7±10.2 min vs. 29.7±26.8 min, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001; 30.0±18.2 min vs. 55.7±40.6 min, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.001, respectively) compared to the control group.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;BIS-guided propofol infusion combined with alfentanil for FB sedation provides excellent patient tolerance, with fast recovery and less procedure interference.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials. gov NCT00789815&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/oHUvCQewFek" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027769</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effect of Supplementation with Zinc and Other Micronutrients on Malaria in Tanzanian Children: A Randomised Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/Fd9wbHg61UE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001125" title="Effect of Supplementation with Zinc and Other Micronutrients on Malaria in Tanzanian Children: A Randomised Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001125&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Effect of Supplementation with Zinc and Other Micronutrients on Malaria in Tanzanian Children: A Randomised Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001125&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Effect of Supplementation with Zinc and Other Micronutrients on Malaria in Tanzanian Children: A Randomised Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Jacobien Veenemans et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001125</id>
    <updated>2011-11-22T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-22T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jacobien Veenemans, Paul Milligan, Andrew M. Prentice, Laura R. A. Schouten, Nienke Inja, Aafke C. van der Heijden, Linsey C. C. de Boer, Esther J. S. Jansen, Anna E. Koopmans, Wendy T. M. Enthoven, Rob J. Kraaijenhagen, Ayse Y. Demir, Donald R. A. Uges, Erasto V. Mbugi, Huub F. J. Savelkoul, Hans Verhoef&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;It is uncertain to what extent oral supplementation with zinc can reduce episodes of malaria in endemic areas. Protection may depend on other nutrients. We measured the effect of supplementation with zinc and other nutrients on malaria rates.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;In a 2×2 factorial trial, 612 rural Tanzanian children aged 6–60 months in an area with intense malaria transmission and with height-for-age z-score≤−1.5 SD were randomized to receive daily oral supplementation with either zinc alone (10 mg), multi-nutrients without zinc, multi-nutrients with zinc, or placebo. Intervention group was indicated by colour code, but neither participants, researchers, nor field staff knew who received what intervention. Those with &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium&lt;/i&gt; infection at baseline were treated with artemether-lumefantrine. The primary outcome, an episode of malaria, was assessed among children reported sick at a primary care clinic, and pre-defined as current &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium&lt;/i&gt; infection with an inflammatory response, shown by axillary temperature ≥37.5°C or whole blood C-reactive protein concentration ≥8 mg/L. Nutritional indicators were assessed at baseline and at 251 days (median; 95% reference range: 191–296 days). In the primary intention-to-treat analysis, we adjusted for pre-specified baseline factors, using Cox regression models that accounted for multiple episodes per child. 592 children completed the study. The primary analysis included 1,572 malaria episodes during 526 child-years of observation (median follow-up: 331 days). Malaria incidence in groups receiving zinc, multi-nutrients without zinc, multi-nutrients with zinc and placebo was 2.89/child-year, 2.95/child-year, 3.26/child-year, and 2.87/child-year, respectively. There was no evidence that multi-nutrients influenced the effect of zinc (or vice versa). Neither zinc nor multi-nutrients influenced malaria rates (marginal analysis; adjusted HR, 95% CI: 1.04, 0.93–1.18 and 1.10, 0.97–1.24 respectively). The prevalence of zinc deficiency (plasma zinc concentration &lt;9.9 µmol/L) was high at baseline (67% overall; 60% in those without inflammation) and strongly reduced by zinc supplementation.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;We found no evidence from this trial that zinc supplementation protected against malaria.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00623857&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/Fd9wbHg61UE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001125</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Role of Survival Post-Progression in Phase III Trials of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/QKTFa-IJ8jE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026646" title="Role of Survival Post-Progression in Phase III Trials of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026646&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Role of Survival Post-Progression in Phase III Trials of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026646&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Role of Survival Post-Progression in Phase III Trials of Systemic Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review" />
    <author>
      <name>Katsuyuki Hotta et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026646</id>
    <updated>2011-11-17T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-17T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Katsuyuki Hotta, Katsuyuki Kiura, Yoshiro Fujiwara, Nagio Takigawa, Akiko Hisamoto, Eiki Ichihara, Masahiro Tabata, Mitsune Tanimoto&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;In advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with the increasing number of active compounds available in salvage settings, survival after progression to first-line chemotherapy seems to have improved. A literature survey was conducted to examine whether survival post-progression (SPP) has improved over the years and to what degree SPP correlates with overall survival (OS).&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;Median progression-free survival (MPFS) time and median survival time (MST) were extracted in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced NSCLC. SPP was pragmatically defined as the time interval of MST minus MPFS. The relationship between MPFS and MST was modeled in a linear function. We used the coefficient of determination (&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;) to assess the correlation between them. Seventy trials with 145 chemotherapy arms were identified. Overall, median SPP was 4.7 months, and a steady improvement in SPP was observed over the 20 years (9.414-day increase per year; p&lt;0.001) in parallel to the increase in MST (11.253-day increase per year; p&lt;0.001); MPFS improved little (1.863-day increase per year). Overall, a stronger association was observed between MST and SPP (&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.8917) than MST and MPFS time (&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.2563), suggesting SPP and MPFS could account for 89% and 25% of the variation in MST, respectively. The association between MST and SPP became closer over the years (&lt;i&gt;r&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; = 0.4428, 0.7242, and 0.9081 in 1988–1994, 1995–2001, and 2002–2007, respectively).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;SPP has become more closely associated with OS, potentially because of intensive post-study treatments. Even in advanced NSCLC, a PFS advantage is unlikely to be associated with an OS advantage any longer due to this increasing impact of SPP on OS, and that the prolongation of SPP might limit the original role of OS for assessing true efficacy derived from early-line chemotherapy in future clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/QKTFa-IJ8jE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026646</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/EfzMwNli2ZE/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027319" title="Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027319&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027319&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation" />
    <author>
      <name>Alison Booth et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027319</id>
    <updated>2011-11-16T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-16T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Alison Booth, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, David Moher, Mark Petticrew, Lesley Stewart&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;In response to growing recognition of the value of prospective registration of systematic review protocols, we planned to develop a web-based open access international register. In order for the register to fulfil its aims of reducing unplanned duplication, reducing publication bias, and providing greater transparency, it was important to ensure the appropriate data were collected. We therefore undertook a consultation process with experts in the field to identify a minimum dataset for registration.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;A two-round electronic modified Delphi survey design was used. The international panel surveyed included experts from areas relevant to systematic review including commissioners, clinical and academic researchers, methodologists, statisticians, information specialists, journal editors and users of systematic reviews. Direct invitations to participate were sent out to 315 people in the first round and 322 in the second round. Responses to an open invitation to participate were collected separately. There were 194 (143 invited and 51 open) respondents with a 100% completion rate in the first round and 209 (169 invited and 40 open) respondents with a 91% completion rate in the second round. In the second round, 113 (54%) of the participants reported having previously taken part in the first round. Participants were asked to indicate whether a series of potential items should be designated as optional or required registration items, or should not be included in the register. After the second round, a 70% or greater agreement was reached on the designation of 30 of 36 items.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;The results of the Delphi exercise have established a dataset of 22 required items for the prospective registration of systematic reviews, and 18 optional items. The dataset captures the key attributes of review design as well as the administrative details necessary for registration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/EfzMwNli2ZE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027319</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Using HIV Transmission Networks to Investigate Community Effects in HIV Prevention Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/I8e3VHePa-k/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027775" title="Using HIV Transmission Networks to Investigate Community Effects in HIV Prevention Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027775&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Using HIV Transmission Networks to Investigate Community Effects in HIV Prevention Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027775&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Using HIV Transmission Networks to Investigate Community Effects in HIV Prevention Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Joel O. Wertheim et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027775</id>
    <updated>2011-11-16T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-16T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Joel O. Wertheim, Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond, Susan J. Little, Victor De Gruttola&lt;/p&gt;

        Effective population screening of HIV and prevention of HIV transmission are only part of the global fight against AIDS. Community-level effects, for example those aimed at thwarting future transmission, are potential outcomes of treatment and may be important in stemming the epidemic. However, current clinical trial designs are incapable of detecting a reduction in future transmission due to treatment. We took advantage of the fact that HIV is an evolving pathogen whose transmission network can be reconstructed using genetic sequence information to address this shortcoming. Here, we use an HIV transmission network inferred from recently infected men who have sex with men (MSM) in San Diego, California. We developed and tested a network-based statistic for measuring treatment effects using simulated clinical trials on our inferred transmission network. We explored the statistical power of this network-based statistic against conventional efficacy measures and find that when future transmission is reduced, the potential for increased statistical power can be realized. Furthermore, our simulations demonstrate that the network statistic is able to detect community-level effects (e.g., reduction in onward transmission) of HIV treatment in a clinical trial setting. This study demonstrates the potential utility of a network-based statistical metric when investigating HIV treatment options as a method to reduce onward transmission in a clinical trial setting.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/I8e3VHePa-k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027775</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Timing of Enteral Feeding in Cerebral Malaria in Resource-Poor Settings: A Randomized Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/OZizRHqlOEU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027273" title="Timing of Enteral Feeding in Cerebral Malaria in Resource-Poor Settings: A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027273&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Timing of Enteral Feeding in Cerebral Malaria in Resource-Poor Settings: A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027273&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Timing of Enteral Feeding in Cerebral Malaria in Resource-Poor Settings: A Randomized Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Richard J. Maude et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0027273</id>
    <updated>2011-11-16T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-16T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Richard J. Maude, Gofranul Hoque, Mahtab Uddin Hasan, Abu Sayeed, Shahena Akter, Rasheda Samad, Badrul Alam, Emran Bin Yunus, Ridwanur Rahman, Waliur Rahman, Romal Chowdhury, Tapan Seal, Prakaykaew Charunwatthana, Christina C. Chang, Nicholas J. White, M. Abul Faiz, Nicholas P. J. Day, Arjen M. Dondorp, Amir Hossain&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Early start of enteral feeding is an established treatment strategy in intubated patients in intensive care since it reduces invasive bacterial infections and length of hospital stay. There is equipoise whether early enteral feeding is also beneficial in non-intubated patients with cerebral malaria in resource poor settings. We hypothesized that the risk of aspiration pneumonia might outweigh the potential benefits of earlier recovery and prevention of hypoglycaemia.&lt;/p&gt; Method and Findings &lt;p&gt;A randomized trial of early (day of admission) versus late (after 60 hours in adults or 36 hours in children) start of enteral feeding was undertaken in patients with cerebral malaria in Chittagong, Bangladesh from May 2008 to August 2009. The primary outcome measures were incidence of aspiration pneumonia, hypoglycaemia and coma recovery time. The trial was terminated after inclusion of 56 patients because of a high incidence of aspiration pneumonia in the early feeding group (9/27 (33%)), compared to the late feeding group (0/29 (0%)), p = 0.001). One patient in the late feeding group, and none in the early group, had hypoglycaemia during admission. There was no significant difference in overall mortality (9/27 (33%) vs 6/29 (21%), p = 0.370), but mortality was 5/9 (56%) in patients with aspiration pneumonia.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;In conclusion, early start of enteral feeding is detrimental in non-intubated patients with cerebral malaria in many resource-poor settings. Evidence gathered in resource rich settings is not necessarily transferable to resource-poor settings.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN57488577&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/OZizRHqlOEU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0027273</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Head-to-Head Comparison of Four Artemisinin-Based Combinations for Treating Uncomplicated Malaria in African Children: A Randomized Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/IDVo5Y3Up2s/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001119" title="A Head-to-Head Comparison of Four Artemisinin-Based Combinations for Treating Uncomplicated Malaria in African Children: A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001119&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) A Head-to-Head Comparison of Four Artemisinin-Based Combinations for Treating Uncomplicated Malaria in African Children: A Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001119&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) A Head-to-Head Comparison of Four Artemisinin-Based Combinations for Treating Uncomplicated Malaria in African Children: A Randomized Trial" />
    <contributor>
      <name>The Four Artemisinin-Based Combinations (4ABC) Study Group</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001119</id>
    <updated>2011-11-08T22:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-08T22:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by The Four Artemisinin-Based Combinations (4ABC) Study Group&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) are the mainstay for the management of uncomplicated malaria cases. However, up-to-date data able to assist sub-Saharan African countries formulating appropriate antimalarial drug policies are scarce.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;Between 9 July 2007 and 19 June 2009, a randomized, non-inferiority (10% difference threshold in efficacy at day 28) clinical trial was carried out at 12 sites in seven sub-Saharan African countries. Each site compared three of four ACTs, namely amodiaquine-artesunate (ASAQ), dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DHAPQ), artemether-lumefantrine (AL), or chlorproguanil-dapsone-artesunate (CD+A). Overall, 4,116 children 6–59 mo old with uncomplicated &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium falciparum&lt;/i&gt; malaria were treated (1,226 with AL, 1,002 with ASAQ, 413 with CD+A, and 1,475 with DHAPQ), actively followed up until day 28, and then passively followed up for the next 6 mo. At day 28, for the PCR-adjusted efficacy, non-inferiority was established for three pair-wise comparisons: DHAPQ (97.3%) versus AL (95.5%) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.94); DHAPQ (97.6%) versus ASAQ (96.8%) (OR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.41–1.34), and ASAQ (97.1%) versus AL (94.4%) (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.28–0.92). For the PCR-unadjusted efficacy, AL was significantly less efficacious than DHAPQ (72.7% versus 89.5%) (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.21–0.34) and ASAQ (66.2% versus 80.4%) (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.30–0.53), while DHAPQ (92.2%) had higher efficacy than ASAQ (80.8%) but non-inferiority could not be excluded (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.26–0.48). CD+A was significantly less efficacious than the other three treatments. Day 63 results were similar to those observed at day 28.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;This large head-to-head comparison of most currently available ACTs in sub-Saharan Africa showed that AL, ASAQ, and DHAPQ had excellent efficacy, up to day 63 post-treatment. The risk of recurrent infections was significantly lower for DHAPQ, followed by ASAQ and then AL, supporting the recent recommendation of considering DHAPQ as a valid option for the treatment of uncomplicated &lt;i&gt;P. falciparum&lt;/i&gt; malaria.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00393679; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR2009010000911750&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/IDVo5Y3Up2s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001119</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/RrLUT-R4Pag/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026827" title="Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026827&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026827&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for the Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis in HIV-Infected Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" />
    <author>
      <name>Jun Chen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026827</id>
    <updated>2011-11-01T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-01T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jun Chen, Renfang Zhang, Jiangrong Wang, Li Liu, Yufang Zheng, Yinzhong Shen, Tangkai Qi, Hongzhou Lu&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) have provided a new method for the diagnosis of &lt;i&gt;Mycobacterium tuberculosis&lt;/i&gt; infection. However, the role of IGRAs for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB), especially in HIV-infected patients remains unclear.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases to identify studies published in January 2001–July 2011 that evaluated the evidence of using QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube (QFT-GIT) and T-SPOT.TB (T-SPOT) on blood for the diagnosis of active TB in HIV-infected patients.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;The search identified 16 eligible studies that included 2801 HIV-infected individuals (637 culture confirmed TB cases). The pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of active TB was 76.7% (95%CI, 71.6–80.5%) and 77.4% (95%CI, 71.4–82.6%) for QFT-GIT and T-SPOT, respectively, while the specificity was 76.1% (95%CI, 74.0–78.0%) and 63.1% (95%CI, 57.6–68.3%) after excluding the indeterminate results. Studies conducted in low/middle income countries showed slightly lower sensitivity and specificity when compared to that in high-income countries. The proportion of indeterminate results was as high as 10% (95%CI, 8.8–11.3%) and 13.2% (95%CI, 10.6–16.0%) for QFT-GIT and T-SPOT, respectively.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusion &lt;p&gt;IGRAs in their current formulations have limited accuracy in diagnosing active TB in HIV-infected patients, and should not be used alone to rule out or rule in active TB cases in HIV-infected patients. Further modification is needed to improve their accuracy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/RrLUT-R4Pag" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026827</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Adjuvant Chemotherapy, with or without Taxanes, in Early or Operable Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 19 Randomized Trials with 30698 Patients</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/Cl7MGzMRUNg/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026946" title="Adjuvant Chemotherapy, with or without Taxanes, in Early or Operable Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 19 Randomized Trials with 30698 Patients" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026946&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Adjuvant Chemotherapy, with or without Taxanes, in Early or Operable Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 19 Randomized Trials with 30698 Patients" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026946&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Adjuvant Chemotherapy, with or without Taxanes, in Early or Operable Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 19 Randomized Trials with 30698 Patients" />
    <author>
      <name>Ying-Yi Qin et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026946</id>
    <updated>2011-11-01T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-11-01T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Ying-Yi Qin, Hui Li, Xiao-Jing Guo, Xiao-Fei Ye, Xin Wei, Yu-Hao Zhou, Xin-Ji Zhang, Chao Wang, Wei Qian, Jian Lu, Jia He&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Taxanes have been extensively used as adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of early or operable breast cancer, particularly in high risk, node-negative breast cancer. Previous studies, however, have reported inconsistent findings regarding their clinical efficacy and safety. We investigated disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and drug-related toxicities of taxanes by a systematic review and meta-analysis.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology and Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials, proceedings of major meetings, and reference lists of articles for studies conducted between January 1980 and April 2011. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing chemotherapy with and without taxanes in the treatment of patients with early-stage or operable breast cancer were eligible for inclusion in our analysis. The primary endpoint was DFS. Nineteen RCTs including 30698 patients were identified, including 8426 recurrence events and 3803 deaths. Taxanes administration yielded a 17% reduction of hazard ratio (HR) for DFS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.79–0.88, p&lt;0.001) and a 17% reduction of HR for OS (HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.90, p&lt;0.001). For high risk, node-negative breast cancer, the pooled HR also favoured the taxane-based treatment arm over the taxane-free treatment arm (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.77–0.87, p = 0.022). A significantly increased rate of neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, fatigue, diarrhea, stomatitis, and oedema was observed in the taxane-based treatment arm.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;Adjuvant chemotherapy with taxanes could reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and death in patients with early or operable breast cancer, although the drug-related toxicities should be balanced. Furthermore, we also demonstrated that patients with high risk, node-negative breast cancer also benefited from taxanes therapy, a result that was not observed in previous studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/Cl7MGzMRUNg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026946</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Repeated Assessments of Informed Consent Comprehension among HIV-Infected Participants of a Three-Year Clinical Trial in Botswana</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/oj43a7H2VD8/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0022696" title="Repeated Assessments of Informed Consent Comprehension among HIV-Infected Participants of a Three-Year Clinical Trial in Botswana" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0022696&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Repeated Assessments of Informed Consent Comprehension among HIV-Infected Participants of a Three-Year Clinical Trial in Botswana" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0022696&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Repeated Assessments of Informed Consent Comprehension among HIV-Infected Participants of a Three-Year Clinical Trial in Botswana" />
    <author>
      <name>Lelia H. Chaisson et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0022696</id>
    <updated>2011-10-27T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-27T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Lelia H. Chaisson, Nancy E. Kass, Bafanana Chengeta, Unami Mathebula, Taraz Samandari&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Informed consent (IC) has been an international standard for decades for the ethical conduct of clinical trials. Yet frequently study participants have incomplete understanding of key issues, a problem exacerbated by language barriers or lack of familiarity with research concepts. Few investigators measure participant comprehension of IC, while even fewer conduct interim assessments once a trial is underway.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;We assessed comprehension of IC using a 20-question true/false quiz administered in 6-month intervals in the context of a placebo-controlled, randomized trial for the prevention of tuberculosis among HIV-infected adults in Botswana (2004–2009). Quizzes were offered in both Setswana and English. To enroll in the TB trial, participants were required to have ≥16/20 correct responses. We examined concepts understood and the degree to which understanding changed over three-years. We analyzed 5,555 quizzes from 1,835 participants. The participants' highest education levels were: 28% primary, 59% secondary, 9% tertiary and 7% no formal education. Eighty percent of participants passed the enrollment quiz (Quiz1) on their first attempt and the remainder passed on their second attempt. Those having higher than primary education and those who took the quiz in English were more likely to receive a passing score on their first attempt (adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals, 3.1 (2.4–4.0) and 1.5 (1.2, 1.9), respectively). The trial's purpose or procedures were understood by 90–100% of participants, while 44–77% understood randomization, placebos, or risks. Participants who failed Quiz1 on their initial attempt were more likely to fail quizzes later in the trial. Pass rates improved with quiz re-administration in subsequent years.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Administration of a comprehension quiz at enrollment and during follow-up was feasible in a large, international collaboration and efficiently determined IC comprehension by trial participants. Strategies to improve understanding of concepts like placebos and randomization are needed. Comprehension assessments throughout a study may reinforce key concepts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/oj43a7H2VD8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0022696</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A Short-Term Physical Activity Randomized Trial in the Lower Mississippi Delta</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/_knI9d6lKa4/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026667" title="A Short-Term Physical Activity Randomized Trial in the Lower Mississippi Delta" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026667&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) A Short-Term Physical Activity Randomized Trial in the Lower Mississippi Delta" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026667&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) A Short-Term Physical Activity Randomized Trial in the Lower Mississippi Delta" />
    <author>
      <name>Peter T. Katzmarzyk et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026667</id>
    <updated>2011-10-25T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-25T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Peter T. Katzmarzyk, Catherine M. Champagne, Catrine Tudor-Locke, Stephanie T. Broyles, David Harsha, Betty M. Kennedy, William D. Johnson&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;The purpose of this study was to determine if a short-term pedometer-based intervention results in immediate increases in time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) compared to a minimal educational intervention.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;A sample of 43 overweight adults 35 to 64 years of age participated in a one week pedometer-based feasibility trial monitored by accelerometry. Participants were randomized into a one-week education-only group or a group that also wore a pedometer. Accelerometer-measured MVPA was measured over 7 days at baseline and again for 7 days immediately post-intervention.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;Minutes of MVPA increased significantly in the overall sample (p = 0.02); however, the effect of adding the pedometer to the education program was not significant (p = 0.89). Mean (±SE) MVPA increased from 12.7±2.4 min/day to 16.2±3.6 min/day in the education-only group and from 13.2±3.3 min/day to 16.3±3.9 min/day in the education+pedometer group. The correlation between change in steps/day and change in MVPA was 0.69 (p&lt;0.0001).&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;The results of this study suggest that the addition of a pedometer to a short-term education program does not produce added benefits with respect to increasing physical activity in the Lower Mississippi Delta.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01264757&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/_knI9d6lKa4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026667</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Effects of Community-Wide Vaccination with PCV-7 on Pneumococcal Nasopharyngeal Carriage in The Gambia: A Cluster-Randomized Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/rrgcQ7CoFJs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001107" title="Effects of Community-Wide Vaccination with PCV-7 on Pneumococcal Nasopharyngeal Carriage in The Gambia: A Cluster-Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001107&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Effects of Community-Wide Vaccination with PCV-7 on Pneumococcal Nasopharyngeal Carriage in The Gambia: A Cluster-Randomized Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001107&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Effects of Community-Wide Vaccination with PCV-7 on Pneumococcal Nasopharyngeal Carriage in The Gambia: A Cluster-Randomized Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Anna Roca et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001107</id>
    <updated>2011-10-18T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-18T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Anna Roca, Philip C. Hill, John Townend, Uzo Egere, Martin Antonio, Abdoulie Bojang, Abiodun Akisanya, Teresa Litchfield, David E. Nsekpong, Claire Oluwalana, Stephen R. C. Howie, Brian Greenwood, Richard A. Adegbola&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) of limited valency is justified in Africa by the high burden of pneumococcal disease. Long-term beneficial effects of PCVs may be countered by serotype replacement. We aimed to determine the impact of PCV-7 vaccination on pneumococcal carriage in rural Gambia.&lt;/p&gt; Methods and Findings &lt;p&gt;A cluster-randomized (by village) trial of the impact of PCV-7 on pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage was conducted in 21 Gambian villages between December 2003 to June 2008 (5,441 inhabitants in 2006). Analysis was complemented with data obtained before vaccination. Because efficacy of PCV-9 in young Gambian children had been shown, it was considered unethical not to give PCV-7 to young children in all of the study villages. PCV-7 was given to children below 30 mo of age and to those born during the trial in all study villages. Villages were randomized (older children and adults) to receive one dose of PCV-7 (11 vaccinated villages) or meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccine (10 control villages). Cross-sectional surveys (CSSs) to collect nasopharyngeal swabs were conducted before vaccination (2,094 samples in the baseline CSS), and 4–6, 12, and 22 mo after vaccination (1,168, 1,210, and 446 samples in CSS-1, -2, and -3, respectively).A time trend analysis showed a marked fall in the prevalence of vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage in all age groups following vaccination (from 23.7% and 26.8% in the baseline CSS to 7.1% and 8.5% in CSS-1, in vaccinated and control villages, respectively). The prevalence of vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage was lower in vaccinated than in control villages among older children (5 y to &lt;15 y of age) and adults (≥15 y of age) at CSS-2 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15 [95% CI 0.04–0.57] and OR = 0.32 [95% CI 0.10–0.98], respectively) and at CSS-3 (OR = 0.37 [95% CI 0.15–0.90] for older children, and 0% versus 7.6% for adults in vaccinated and control villages, respectively). Differences in the prevalence of non-vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage between vaccinated and control villages were small.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Vaccination of Gambian children reduced vaccine-type pneumococcal carriage across all age groups, indicating a “herd effect” in non-vaccinated older children and adults. No significant serotype replacement was detected.&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p&gt;
            &lt;i&gt;Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary&lt;/i&gt;
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/rrgcQ7CoFJs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001107</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Efficacy of a Low-Cost, Inactivated Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine: Results from 3 Years of Follow-Up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/U13NI5j3Imw/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0001289" title="Efficacy of a Low-Cost, Inactivated Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine: Results from 3 Years of Follow-Up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001289&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Efficacy of a Low-Cost, Inactivated Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine: Results from 3 Years of Follow-Up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001289&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Efficacy of a Low-Cost, Inactivated Whole-Cell Oral Cholera Vaccine: Results from 3 Years of Follow-Up of a Randomized, Controlled Trial" />
    <author>
      <name>Dipika Sur et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001289</id>
    <updated>2011-10-18T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-18T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Dipika Sur, Suman Kanungo, Binod Sah, Byomkesh Manna, Mohammad Ali, Allison M. Paisley, Swapan K. Niyogi, Jin Kyung Park, Banawarilal Sarkar, Mahesh K. Puri, Deok Ryun Kim, Jacqueline L. Deen, Jan Holmgren, Rodney Carbis, Raman Rao, Nguyen Thu Van, Seung Hyun Han, Stephen Attridge, Allan Donner, Nirmal K. Ganguly, Sujit K. Bhattacharya, G. Balakrish Nair, John D. Clemens, Anna Lena Lopez&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Killed oral cholera vaccines (OCVs) have been licensed for use in developing countries, but protection conferred by licensed OCVs beyond two years of follow-up has not been demonstrated in randomized, clinical trials.&lt;/p&gt; Methods/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We conducted a cluster-randomized, placebo-controlled trial of a two-dose regimen of a low-cost killed whole cell OCV in residents 1 year of age and older living in 3,933 clusters in Kolkata, India. The primary endpoint was culture-proven &lt;i&gt;Vibrio cholerae&lt;/i&gt; O1 diarrhea episodes severe enough to require treatment in a health care facility. Of the 66,900 fully dosed individuals (31,932 vaccinees and 34,968 placebo recipients), 38 vaccinees and 128 placebo-recipients developed cholera during three years of follow-up (protective efficacy 66%; one-sided 95%CI lower bound = 53%, p&lt;0.001). Vaccine protection during the third year of follow-up was 65% (one-sided 95%CI lower bound = 44%, p&lt;0.001). Significant protection was evident in the second year of follow-up in children vaccinated at ages 1–4 years and in the third year in older age groups.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;The killed whole-cell OCV conferred significant protection that was evident in the second year of follow-up in young children and was sustained for at least three years in older age groups. Continued follow-up will be important to establish the vaccine's duration of protection.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00289224.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/U13NI5j3Imw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pntd.0001289</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Parathyroid Hormone versus Bisphosphonate Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/n6DjcQ9jssY/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026267" title="Parathyroid Hormone versus Bisphosphonate Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026267&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Parathyroid Hormone versus Bisphosphonate Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026267&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Parathyroid Hormone versus Bisphosphonate Treatment on Bone Mineral Density in Osteoporosis Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Longxiang Shen et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026267</id>
    <updated>2011-10-12T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-12T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Longxiang Shen, Xuetao Xie, Yan Su, Congfeng Luo, Changqing Zhang, Bingfang Zeng&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Bisphosphonates and parathyroid hormone (PTH) represent the antiresorptive and anabolic classes of drugs for osteoporosis treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) is an essential parameter for the evaluation of anti-osteoporotic drugs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of PTH versus bisphosphonates on BMD for the treatment of osteoporosis.&lt;/p&gt; Methods/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;We performed a literature search to identify studies that investigated the effects of PTH versus bisphosphonates treatment on BMD. A total of 7 articles were included in this study, representing data on 944 subjects. The pooled data showed that the percent change of increased BMD in the spine is higher with PTH compared to bisphosphonates (WMD = 5.90, 95% CI: 3.69–8.10, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01,). In the hip, high dose (40 µg) PTH (1–34) showed significantly higher increments of BMD compared to alendronate (femoral neck: WMD = 5.67, 95% CI: 3.47–7.87, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01; total hip: WMD = 2.40, 95%CI: 0.49–4.31, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.05). PTH treatment has yielded significantly higher increments than bisphosphonates with a duration of over 12 months (femoral neck: WMD = 5.67, 95% CI: 3.47–7.86, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01; total hip: WMD = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.49–4.31, &lt;i&gt;P&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.05) and significantly lower increments at 12 months (femoral neck: WMD = −1.05, 95% CI: −2.26–0.16, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01; total hip: WMD: −1.69, 95% CI: −3.05–0.34, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.05). In the distal radius, a reduction in BMD was significant between PTH and alendronate treatment. (WMD = −3.68, 95% CI: −5.57–1.79, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.01).&lt;/p&gt; Discussion &lt;p&gt;Our results demonstrated that PTH significantly increased lumbar spine BMD as compared to treatment with bisphosphonates and PTH treatment induced duration- and dose-dependent increases in hip BMD as compared to bisphosphonates treatment. This study has also disclosed that for the distal radius, BMD was significantly lower from PTH treatment than alendronate treatment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/n6DjcQ9jssY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026267</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Intra- and Inter-clade Cross-reactivity by HIV-1 Gag Specific T-Cells Reveals Exclusive and Commonly Targeted Regions: Implications for Current Vaccine Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/qQTo2_aF9XU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026096" title="Intra- and Inter-clade Cross-reactivity by HIV-1 Gag Specific T-Cells Reveals Exclusive and Commonly Targeted Regions: Implications for Current Vaccine Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026096&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Intra- and Inter-clade Cross-reactivity by HIV-1 Gag Specific T-Cells Reveals Exclusive and Commonly Targeted Regions: Implications for Current Vaccine Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026096&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Intra- and Inter-clade Cross-reactivity by HIV-1 Gag Specific T-Cells Reveals Exclusive and Commonly Targeted Regions: Implications for Current Vaccine Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Lycias Zembe et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0026096</id>
    <updated>2011-10-12T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-12T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Lycias Zembe, Wendy A. Burgers, Heather B. Jaspan, Linda-Gail Bekker, Helba Bredell, Gwynneth Stevens, Jill Gilmour, Josephine H. Cox, Patricia Fast, Peter Hayes, Eftyhia Vardas, Carolyn Williamson, Clive M. Gray&lt;/p&gt;

        The genetic diversity of HIV-1 across the globe is a major challenge for developing an HIV vaccine. To facilitate immunogen design, it is important to characterize clusters of commonly targeted T-cell epitopes across different HIV clades. To address this, we examined 39 HIV-1 clade C infected individuals for IFN-γ Gag-specific T-cell responses using five sets of overlapping peptides, two sets matching clade C vaccine candidates derived from strains from South Africa and China, and three peptide sets corresponding to consensus clades A, B, and D sequences. The magnitude and breadth of T-cell responses against the two clade C peptide sets did not differ, however clade C peptides were preferentially recognized compared to the other peptide sets. A total of 84 peptides were recognized, of which 19 were exclusively from clade C, 8 exclusively from clade B, one peptide each from A and D and 17 were commonly recognized by clade A, B, C and D. The entropy of the exclusively recognized peptides was significantly higher than that of commonly recognized peptides (p = 0.0128) and the median peptide processing scores were significantly higher for the peptide variants recognized versus those not recognized (p = 0.0001). Consistent with these results, the predicted Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I IC&lt;sub&gt;50&lt;/sub&gt; values were significantly lower for the recognized peptide variants compared to those not recognized in the ELISPOT assay (p&lt;0.0001), suggesting that peptide variation between clades, resulting in lack of cross-clade recognition, has been shaped by host immune selection pressure. Overall, our study shows that clade C infected individuals recognize clade C peptides with greater frequency and higher magnitude than other clades, and that a selection of highly conserved epitope regions within Gag are commonly recognized and give rise to cross-clade reactivities.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/qQTo2_aF9XU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026096</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Adenovirus-5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part B: Safety, Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of the CSP Component</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/XL00CJiYfzA/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025868" title="Adenovirus-5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part B: Safety, Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of the CSP Component" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025868&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Adenovirus-5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part B: Safety, Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of the CSP Component" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025868&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Adenovirus-5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part B: Safety, Immunogenicity and Protective Efficacy of the CSP Component" />
    <author>
      <name>Cindy Tamminga et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025868</id>
    <updated>2011-10-07T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-07T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Cindy Tamminga, Martha Sedegah, David Regis, Ilin Chuang, Judith E. Epstein, Michele Spring, Jose Mendoza-Silveiras, Shannon McGrath, Santina Maiolatesi, Sharina Reyes, Victoria Steinbeiss, Charlotte Fedders, Kathryn Smith, Brent House, Harini Ganeshan, Jennylynn Lejano, Esteban Abot, Glenna J. Banania, Renato Sayo, Fouzia Farooq, Maria Belmonte, Jittawadee Murphy, Jack Komisar, Jackie Williams, Meng Shi, Donald Brambilla, Nalini Manohar, Nancy O. Richie, Chloe Wood, Keith Limbach, Noelle B. Patterson, Joseph T. Bruder, Denise L. Doolan, C. Richter King, Carter Diggs, Lorraine Soisson, Daniel Carucci, Gail Levine, Sheetij Dutta, Michael R. Hollingdale, Christian F. Ockenhouse, Thomas L. Richie&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;A protective malaria vaccine will likely need to elicit both cell-mediated and antibody responses. As adenovirus vaccine vectors induce both these responses in humans, a Phase 1/2a clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of an adenovirus serotype 5-vectored malaria vaccine against sporozoite challenge.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;NMRC-MV-Ad-PfC is an adenovirus vector encoding the &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium falciparum&lt;/i&gt; 3D7 circumsporozoite protein (CSP). It is one component of a two-component vaccine NMRC-M3V-Ad-PfCA consisting of one adenovector encoding CSP and one encoding apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1) that was evaluated for safety and immunogenicity in an earlier study (see companion paper, Sedegah et al). Fourteen Ad5 seropositive or negative adults received two doses of NMRC-MV-Ad-PfC sixteen weeks apart, at  particle units per dose. The vaccine was safe and well tolerated. All volunteers developed positive ELISpot responses by 28 days after the first immunization (geometric mean 272 spot forming cells/million[sfc/m]) that declined during the following 16 weeks and increased after the second dose to levels that in most cases were less than the initial peak (geometric mean 119 sfc/m). CD8+ predominated over CD4+ responses, as in the first clinical trial. Antibody responses were poor and like ELISpot responses increased after the second immunization but did not exceed the initial peak. Pre-existing neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to Ad5 did not affect the immunogenicity of the first dose, but the fold increase in NAb induced by the first dose was significantly associated with poorer antibody responses after the second dose, while ELISpot responses remained unaffected. When challenged by the bite of &lt;i&gt;P. falciparum&lt;/i&gt;-infected mosquitoes, two of 11 volunteers showed a delay in the time to patency compared to infectivity controls, but no volunteers were sterilely protected.&lt;/p&gt; Significance &lt;p&gt;The NMRC-MV-Ad-PfC vaccine expressing CSP was safe and well tolerated given as two doses, but did not provide sterile protection.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;
            ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00392015
          &lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/XL00CJiYfzA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025868</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Adenovirus 5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part A: Safety and Immunogenicity in Seronegative Adults</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/kl93ycJAx_A/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024586" title="Adenovirus 5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part A: Safety and Immunogenicity in Seronegative Adults" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024586&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Adenovirus 5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part A: Safety and Immunogenicity in Seronegative Adults" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024586&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Adenovirus 5-Vectored P. falciparum Vaccine Expressing CSP and AMA1. Part A: Safety and Immunogenicity in Seronegative Adults" />
    <author>
      <name>Martha Sedegah et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0024586</id>
    <updated>2011-10-07T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-07T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Martha Sedegah, Cindy Tamminga, Shannon McGrath, Brent House, Harini Ganeshan, Jennylynn Lejano, Esteban Abot, Glenna J. Banania, Renato Sayo, Fouzia Farooq, Maria Belmonte, Nalini Manohar, Nancy O. Richie, Chloe Wood, Carole A. Long, David Regis, Francis T. Williams, Meng Shi, Ilin Chuang, Michele Spring, Judith E. Epstein, Jose Mendoza-Silveiras, Keith Limbach, Noelle B. Patterson, Joseph T. Bruder, Denise L. Doolan, C. Richter King, Lorraine Soisson, Carter Diggs, Daniel Carucci, Sheetij Dutta, Michael R. Hollingdale, Christian F. Ockenhouse, Thomas L. Richie&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Models of immunity to malaria indicate the importance of CD8+ T cell responses for targeting intrahepatic stages and antibodies for targeting sporozoite and blood stages. We designed a multistage adenovirus 5 (Ad5)-vectored &lt;i&gt;Plasmodium falciparum&lt;/i&gt; malaria vaccine, aiming to induce both types of responses in humans, that was tested for safety and immunogenicity in a Phase 1 dose escalation trial in Ad5-seronegative volunteers.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;The NMRC-M3V-Ad-PfCA vaccine combines two adenovectors encoding circumsporozoite protein (CSP) and apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1). Group 1 (n = 6) healthy volunteers received one intramuscular injection of 2×10∧10 particle units (1×10∧10 each construct) and Group 2 (n = 6) a five-fold higher dose. Transient, mild to moderate adverse events were more pronounced with the higher dose. ELISpot responses to CSP and AMA1 peaked at 1 month, were higher in the low dose (geomean CSP = 422, AMA1 = 862 spot forming cells/million) than in the high dose (CSP = 154, p = 0.049, AMA1 = 423, p = 0.045) group and were still positive at 12 months in a number of volunteers. ELISpot depletion assays identified dependence on CD4+ or on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, with few responses dependent only on CD8+ T cells. Intracellular cytokine staining detected stronger CD8+ than CD4+ T cell IFN-γ responses (CSP p = 0.0001, AMA1 p = 0.003), but similar frequencies of multifunctional CD4+ and CD8+ T cells secreting two or more of IFN-γ, TNF-α or IL-2. Median fluorescence intensities were 7–10 fold higher in triple than single secreting cells. Antibody responses were low but trended higher in the high dose group and did not inhibit growth of cultured &lt;i&gt;P. falciparum&lt;/i&gt; blood stage parasites.&lt;/p&gt; Significance &lt;p&gt;As found in other trials, adenovectored vaccines appeared safe and well-tolerated at doses up to 1×10∧11 particle units. This is the first demonstration in humans of a malaria vaccine eliciting strong CD8+ T cell IFN-γ responses.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00392015&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/kl93ycJAx_A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0024586</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Can Simply Answering Research Questions Change Behaviour? Systematic Review and Meta Analyses of Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/CjYvuCpRDtM/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0023748" title="Can Simply Answering Research Questions Change Behaviour? Systematic Review and Meta Analyses of Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023748&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Can Simply Answering Research Questions Change Behaviour? Systematic Review and Meta Analyses of Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023748&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Can Simply Answering Research Questions Change Behaviour? Systematic Review and Meta Analyses of Brief Alcohol Intervention Trials" />
    <author>
      <name>Jim McCambridge et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023748</id>
    <updated>2011-10-05T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-05T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Jim McCambridge, Kypros Kypri&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Participant reports of their own behaviour are critical for the provision and evaluation of behavioural interventions. Recent developments in brief alcohol intervention trials provide an opportunity to evaluate longstanding concerns that answering questions on behaviour as part of research assessments may inadvertently influence it and produce bias. The study objective was to evaluate the size and nature of effects observed in randomized manipulations of the effects of answering questions on drinking behaviour in brief intervention trials.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology/Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;Multiple methods were used to identify primary studies. Between-group differences in total weekly alcohol consumption, quantity per drinking day and AUDIT scores were evaluated in random effects meta-analyses.Ten trials were included in this review, of which two did not provide findings for quantitative study, in which three outcomes were evaluated. Between-group differences were of the magnitude of 13.7 (−0.17 to 27.6) grams of alcohol per week (approximately 1.5 U.K. units or 1 standard U.S. drink) and 1 point (0.1 to 1.9) in AUDIT score. There was no difference in quantity per drinking day.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions/Significance &lt;p&gt;Answering questions on drinking in brief intervention trials appears to alter subsequent self-reported behaviour. This potentially generates bias by exposing non-intervention control groups to an integral component of the intervention. The effects of brief alcohol interventions may thus have been consistently under-estimated. These findings are relevant to evaluations of any interventions to alter behaviours which involve participant self-report.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/CjYvuCpRDtM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0023748</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Characteristics of HIV-1 Serodiscordant Couples Enrolled in a Clinical Trial of Antiretroviral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV-1 Prevention</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/As6VQ-COMJs/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025828" title="Characteristics of HIV-1 Serodiscordant Couples Enrolled in a Clinical Trial of Antiretroviral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV-1 Prevention" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025828&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Characteristics of HIV-1 Serodiscordant Couples Enrolled in a Clinical Trial of Antiretroviral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV-1 Prevention" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025828&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Characteristics of HIV-1 Serodiscordant Couples Enrolled in a Clinical Trial of Antiretroviral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV-1 Prevention" />
    <author>
      <name>Andrew Mujugira et al.</name>
    </author>
    <contributor>
      <name>for the Partners PrEP Study Team</name>
    </contributor>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025828</id>
    <updated>2011-10-05T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-10-05T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Andrew Mujugira, Jared M. Baeten, Deborah Donnell, Patrick Ndase, Nelly R. Mugo, Linda Barnes, James D. Campbell, Jonathan Wangisi, Jordan W. Tappero, Elizabeth Bukusi, Craig R. Cohen, Elly Katabira, Allan Ronald, Elioda Tumwesigye, Edwin Were, Kenneth H. Fife, James Kiarie, Carey Farquhar, Grace John-Stewart, Lara Kidoguchi, Dana Panteleeff, Meighan Krows, Heena Shah, Jennifer Revall, Susan Morrison, Lisa Ondrejcek, Charlotte Ingram, Robert W. Coombs, Jairam R. Lingappa, Connie Celum, for the Partners PrEP Study Team&lt;/p&gt;
Introduction &lt;p&gt;Stable heterosexual HIV-1 serodiscordant couples in Africa have high HIV-1 transmission rates and are a critical population for evaluation of new HIV-1 prevention strategies. The Partners PrEP Study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of tenofovir and emtricitabine-tenofovir pre-exposure prophylaxis to decrease HIV-1 acquisition within heterosexual HIV-1 serodiscordant couples. We describe the trial design and characteristics of the study cohort.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;HIV-1 serodiscordant couples, in which the HIV-1 infected partner did not meet national guidelines for initiation of antiretroviral therapy, were enrolled at 9 research sites in Kenya and Uganda. The HIV-1 susceptible partner was randomized to daily oral tenofovir, emtricitabine-tenofovir, or matching placebo with monthly follow-up for 24–36 months.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;From July 2008 to November 2010, 7920 HIV-1 serodiscordant couples were screened and 4758 enrolled. For 62% (2966/4758) of enrolled couples, the HIV-1 susceptible partner was male. Median age was 33 years for HIV-1 susceptible and HIV-1 infected partners [IQR (28–40) and (26–39) respectively]. Most couples (98%) were married, with a median duration of partnership of 7.0 years (IQR 3.0–14.0) and recent knowledge of their serodiscordant status [median 0.4 years (IQR 0.1–2.0)]. During the month prior to enrollment, couples reported a median of 4 sex acts (IQR 2–8); 27% reported unprotected sex and 14% of male and 1% of female HIV-1 susceptible partners reported sex with outside partners. Among HIV-1 infected partners, the median plasma HIV-1 level was 3.94 log&lt;sub&gt;10&lt;/sub&gt; copies/mL (IQR 3.31–4.53) and median CD4 count was 496 cells/µL (IQR 375–662); the majority (64%) had WHO stage 1 HIV-1 disease.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Couples at high risk of HIV-1 transmission were rapidly recruited into the Partners PrEP Study, the largest efficacy trial of oral PrEP. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00557245)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/As6VQ-COMJs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025828</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Phase I Randomised Clinical Trial of an HIV-1CN54, Clade C, Trimeric Envelope Vaccine Candidate Delivered Vaginally</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/b_8BcID78yU/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025165" title="Phase I Randomised Clinical Trial of an HIV-1CN54, Clade C, Trimeric Envelope Vaccine Candidate Delivered Vaginally" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025165&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Phase I Randomised Clinical Trial of an HIV-1CN54, Clade C, Trimeric Envelope Vaccine Candidate Delivered Vaginally" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025165&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Phase I Randomised Clinical Trial of an HIV-1CN54, Clade C, Trimeric Envelope Vaccine Candidate Delivered Vaginally" />
    <author>
      <name>David J. Lewis et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025165</id>
    <updated>2011-09-30T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-09-30T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by David J. Lewis, Carol A. Fraser, Abdel N. Mahmoud, Rebecca C. Wiggins, Maria Woodrow, Alethea Cope, Chun Cai, Rafaela Giemza, Simon A. Jeffs, Maria Manoussaka, Tom Cole, Martin P. Cranage, Robin J. Shattock, Charles J. Lacey&lt;/p&gt;
Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00637962&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/b_8BcID78yU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025165</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Safety, Immunogenicity and Dose Ranging of a New Vi-CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine against Typhoid Fever: Randomized Clinical Testing in Healthy Adults</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/LLhT7bnyLmM/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025398" title="Safety, Immunogenicity and Dose Ranging of a New Vi-CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine against Typhoid Fever: Randomized Clinical Testing in Healthy Adults" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025398&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) Safety, Immunogenicity and Dose Ranging of a New Vi-CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine against Typhoid Fever: Randomized Clinical Testing in Healthy Adults" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025398&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) Safety, Immunogenicity and Dose Ranging of a New Vi-CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine against Typhoid Fever: Randomized Clinical Testing in Healthy Adults" />
    <author>
      <name>Pierre van Damme et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0025398</id>
    <updated>2011-09-30T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-09-30T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Pierre van Damme, Froukje Kafeja, Alessandra Anemona, Venere Basile, Anne Katrin Hilbert, Ilse De Coster, Simona Rondini, Francesca Micoli, Rana M. Qasim Khan, Elisa Marchetti, Vito Di Cioccio, Allan Saul, Laura B. Martin, Audino Podda&lt;/p&gt;
Background &lt;p&gt;Typhoid fever causes more than 21 million cases of disease and 200,000 deaths yearly worldwide, with more than 90% of the disease burden being reported from Asia. Epidemiological data show high disease incidence in young children and suggest that immunization programs should target children below two years of age: this is not possible with available vaccines. The Novartis Vaccines Institute for Global Health developed a conjugate vaccine (Vi-CRM&lt;sub&gt;197&lt;/sub&gt;) for infant vaccination concomitantly with EPI vaccines, either starting at 6 weeks with DTP or at 9 months with measles vaccine. We report the results from a Phase 1 and a Phase 2 dose ranging trial with Vi-CRM&lt;sub&gt;197&lt;/sub&gt; in European adults.&lt;/p&gt; Methodology &lt;p&gt;Following randomized blinded comparison of single vaccination with either Vi-CRM&lt;sub&gt;197&lt;/sub&gt; or licensed polysaccharide vaccines (both containing 25·0 µg of Vi antigen), a randomised observer blinded dose ranging trial was performed in the same center to compare three concentrations of Vi-CRM&lt;sub&gt;197&lt;/sub&gt; (1·25 µg, 5·0 µg and 12·5 µg of Vi antigen) with the polysaccharide vaccine.&lt;/p&gt; Principal Findings &lt;p&gt;All vaccines were well tolerated. Compared to the polysaccharide vaccine, Vi-CRM&lt;sub&gt;197&lt;/sub&gt; induced a higher incidence of mild to moderate short lasting local pain. All Vi-CRM&lt;sub&gt;197&lt;/sub&gt; formulations induced higher Vi antibody levels compared to licensed control, with clear dose response relationship.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Vi-CRM&lt;sub&gt;197&lt;/sub&gt; did not elicit safety concerns, was highly immunogenic and is therefore suitable for further clinical testing in endemic populations of South Asia.&lt;/p&gt; Trial Registration &lt;p&gt;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01123941 NCT01193907&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/LLhT7bnyLmM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0025398</feedburner:origLink></entry>
  <entry>
    <title>First Phase 1 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Rectal Microbicide Trial Using UC781 Gel with a Novel Index of Ex Vivo Efficacy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~3/LbE_yJiWtrg/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0023243" title="First Phase 1 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Rectal Microbicide Trial Using UC781 Gel with a Novel Index of Ex Vivo Efficacy" />
    <link rel="related" type="application/pdf" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023243&amp;representation=PDF" title="(PDF) First Phase 1 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Rectal Microbicide Trial Using UC781 Gel with a Novel Index of Ex Vivo Efficacy" />
    <link rel="related" type="text/xml" href="http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/fetchObjectAttachment.action?uri=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023243&amp;representation=XML" title="(XML) First Phase 1 Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Rectal Microbicide Trial Using UC781 Gel with a Novel Index of Ex Vivo Efficacy" />
    <author>
      <name>Peter A. Anton et al.</name>
    </author>
    <id>info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0023243</id>
    <updated>2011-09-28T21:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2011-09-28T21:00:00Z</published>
    <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;by Peter A. Anton, Terry Saunders, Julie Elliott, Elena Khanukhova, Robert Dennis, Amy Adler, Galen Cortina, Karen Tanner, John Boscardin, William G. Cumberland, Ying Zhou, Ana Ventuneac, Alex Carballo-Diéguez, Lorna Rabe, Timothy McCormick, Henry Gabelnick, Christine Mauck, Ian McGowan&lt;/p&gt;
Objectives &lt;p&gt;Successful control of the HIV/AIDS pandemic requires reduction of HIV-1 transmission at sexually-exposed mucosae. No prevention studies of the higher-risk rectal compartment exist. We report the first-in-field Phase 1 trial of a rectally-applied, vaginally-formulated microbicide gel with the RT-inhibitor UC781 measuring clinical and mucosal safety, acceptability and plasma drug levels. A first-in-Phase 1 assessment of preliminary pharmacodynamics was included by measuring changes in &lt;i&gt;ex vivo&lt;/i&gt; HIV-1 suppression in rectal biopsy tissue after exposure to product &lt;i&gt;in vivo&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; Methods &lt;p&gt;HIV-1 seronegative, sexually-abstinent men and women (N = 36) were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing UC781 gel at two concentrations (0.1%, 0.25%) with placebo gel (1∶1∶1). Baseline, single-dose exposure and a separate, 7-day at-home dosing were assessed. Safety and acceptability were primary endpoints. Changes in colorectal mucosal markers and UC781 plasma drug levels were secondary endpoints; &lt;i&gt;ex vivo&lt;/i&gt; biopsy infectibility was an ancillary endpoint.&lt;/p&gt; Results &lt;p&gt;All 36 subjects enrolled completed the 7–14 week trial (100% retention) including 3 flexible sigmoidoscopies, each with 28 biopsies (14 at 10 cm; 14 at 30 cm). There were 81 Grade 1 adverse events (AEs) and 8 Grade 2; no Grade 3, 4 or procedure-related AEs were reported. Acceptability was high, including likelihood of future use. No changes in mucosal immunoinflammatory markers were identified. Plasma levels of UC781 were not detected. &lt;i&gt;Ex vivo&lt;/i&gt; infection of biopsies using two titers of HIV-1&lt;sub&gt;BaL&lt;/sub&gt; showed marked suppression of p24 in tissues exposed &lt;i&gt;in vivo&lt;/i&gt; to 0.25% UC781; strong trends of suppression were seen with the lower 0.1% UC781 concentration.&lt;/p&gt; Conclusions &lt;p&gt;Single and 7-day topical rectal exposure to both concentrations of UC781 were safe with no significant AEs, high acceptability, no detected plasma drug levels and no significant mucosal changes. &lt;i&gt;Ex vivo&lt;/i&gt; biopsy infections demonstrated marked suppression of HIV infectibility, identifying a potential early biomarker of efficacy. (Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; #NCT00408538)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plosclinicaltrials/NewArticles/~4/LbE_yJiWtrg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content>
  <feedburner:origLink>http://clinicaltrials.ploshubs.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0023243</feedburner:origLink></entry>
</feed>

