<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.plos.org/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EveryONE</title>
	
	<link>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.plos.org/plos/blogs/everyoneComments" /><feedburner:info uri="plos/blogs/everyonecomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on So I’m a doctor – now what? Post-PhD career choices by David Jenkins</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/PN0ce4mwiAk/</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jenkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 20:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8683#comment-156935</guid>
		<description>Speaking from the perspective of a graduate from a PhD program in the UK (biological sciences from University of Warwick) I would say that my experience is consistent with those data. After working with postdocs who were much better scientists than me and were looking for a faculty position, and couldn't get one, I became quite disillusioned with the process. As far as I could tell, competition for research grants and lectureship positions was so fierce that it would be more rewarding to choose an alternative career route now than be forced out further down the path.

After graduating (about 5 years ago) I moved out of bench science completely and now work as a medical writer. The money's better, there's a better chance of progression, and I'm roughly allied with the pharmaceutical industry so I still keep track of current science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking from the perspective of a graduate from a PhD program in the UK (biological sciences from University of Warwick) I would say that my experience is consistent with those data. After working with postdocs who were much better scientists than me and were looking for a faculty position, and couldn&#8217;t get one, I became quite disillusioned with the process. As far as I could tell, competition for research grants and lectureship positions was so fierce that it would be more rewarding to choose an alternative career route now than be forced out further down the path.</p>
<p>After graduating (about 5 years ago) I moved out of bench science completely and now work as a medical writer. The money&#8217;s better, there&#8217;s a better chance of progression, and I&#8217;m roughly allied with the pharmaceutical industry so I still keep track of current science.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/PN0ce4mwiAk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/05/07/so-im-a-doctor-now-what-post-phd-career-choices/#comment-156935</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So I’m a doctor – now what? Post-PhD career choices by Rachel Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/UDcVAJS2nJA/</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8683#comment-156929</guid>
		<description>I agree that in my experience, most computer scientists pursuing PhDs were pretty committed to the academic research route, exactly for the reason you describe, but this is also totally anecdotal! I would guess that the interest in an academic career would still decrease somewhat for them, but it would be interesting to know the starting interest level relative to that in other fields.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that in my experience, most computer scientists pursuing PhDs were pretty committed to the academic research route, exactly for the reason you describe, but this is also totally anecdotal! I would guess that the interest in an academic career would still decrease somewhat for them, but it would be interesting to know the starting interest level relative to that in other fields.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/UDcVAJS2nJA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/05/07/so-im-a-doctor-now-what-post-phd-career-choices/#comment-156929</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So I’m a doctor – now what? Post-PhD career choices by Calden Wloka</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/-3L7CjZZkfE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Calden Wloka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8683#comment-156927</guid>
		<description>I am curious what a similar survey would show for computer science.  Much like chemistry, I imagine that there would be a fairly high draw for non-academic positions, but at the same time it seems like many well-paying computer science jobs are still available with just an undergraduate degree (more so, I believe, than in chemistry, though I could be wrong about this), and thus those who go into graduate studies may be more interested in the path of academic research.  Without any actual empirical data on this, though, I am just rambling...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious what a similar survey would show for computer science.  Much like chemistry, I imagine that there would be a fairly high draw for non-academic positions, but at the same time it seems like many well-paying computer science jobs are still available with just an undergraduate degree (more so, I believe, than in chemistry, though I could be wrong about this), and thus those who go into graduate studies may be more interested in the path of academic research.  Without any actual empirical data on this, though, I am just rambling&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/-3L7CjZZkfE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/05/07/so-im-a-doctor-now-what-post-phd-career-choices/#comment-156927</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So I’m a doctor – now what? Post-PhD career choices by Rachel Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/zRAALSSKoXs/</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8683#comment-156921</guid>
		<description>Great question Tabitha. Of course I expect it's probably a bit of both, but I'd be inclined to guess that it's more the latter (changing perception of the careers available). I'd be interested in the differences between disciplines for this too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question Tabitha. Of course I expect it&#8217;s probably a bit of both, but I&#8217;d be inclined to guess that it&#8217;s more the latter (changing perception of the careers available). I&#8217;d be interested in the differences between disciplines for this too.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/zRAALSSKoXs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/05/07/so-im-a-doctor-now-what-post-phd-career-choices/#comment-156921</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So I’m a doctor – now what? Post-PhD career choices by Tabitha</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/ZFSpTzhWqFY/</link>
		<dc:creator>Tabitha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8683#comment-156793</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting if one of these studies also looked at what early- and late-stage Ph.D. students are looking for in a career.  Do students change career aspirations because their values change or because their perceptions of various career paths change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting if one of these studies also looked at what early- and late-stage Ph.D. students are looking for in a career.  Do students change career aspirations because their values change or because their perceptions of various career paths change?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/ZFSpTzhWqFY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/05/07/so-im-a-doctor-now-what-post-phd-career-choices/#comment-156793</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ask everyONE: Why does my corrected article show up twice in PubMed? by Heterogeneous temporal profiles of olfactory receptor neurons in Lobster « Memming</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/hgXryFLlVEk/</link>
		<dc:creator>Heterogeneous temporal profiles of olfactory receptor neurons in Lobster « Memming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8427#comment-155049</guid>
		<description>[...] correct the actual article (because of the inconsistency it will cause for other indexing systems [1][2]). This could have been fixed in the proof, if PLoS did proofs before final publications, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] correct the actual article (because of the inconsistency it will cause for other indexing systems [1][2]). This could have been fixed in the proof, if PLoS did proofs before final publications, but [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/hgXryFLlVEk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/04/09/ask-everyone-why-does-my-corrected-article-show-up-twice-in-pubmed/#comment-155049</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Most Common PLoS ONE Questions (FAQ) by LabArchives and BioMed Central: a new platform for publishing scientific data « Labarchives' Blog</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/hmUiIkl35QM/</link>
		<dc:creator>LabArchives and BioMed Central: a new platform for publishing scientific data « Labarchives' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 13:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/#comment-152027</guid>
		<description>[...] submit virtually unlimited numbers of additional files to our journals, up to 20Mb per file –  twice as much as some publishers, but in the age of ‘big data’ this can still sometimes be limiting . Users who choose to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] submit virtually unlimited numbers of additional files to our journals, up to 20Mb per file –  twice as much as some publishers, but in the age of ‘big data’ this can still sometimes be limiting . Users who choose to [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/hmUiIkl35QM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/authors/qa/#comment-152027</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Virtual Reality to Understand Human Perception: An Author Spotlight on Andrew Glennerster by drip | david’s really interesting pages…</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/amqfuziRWv8/</link>
		<dc:creator>drip | david’s really interesting pages…</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8379#comment-151997</guid>
		<description>[...] interview with Andrew Glennerster about his work on the way we perceive the world as we move about.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] interview with Andrew Glennerster about his work on the way we perceive the world as we move about.   [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/amqfuziRWv8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/04/03/using-virtual-reality-to-understand-human-perception-an-author-spotlight-on-andrew-glennerster/#comment-151997</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PLoS ONE on Twitter and FriendFeed by #BoraZUofA Linkfest: A collection of the sites and posts referenced in Bora’s talks « Boundary Vision</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/axzGVi3OlwY/</link>
		<dc:creator>#BoraZUofA Linkfest: A collection of the sites and posts referenced in Bora’s talks « Boundary Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://everyone.plos.org/?p=841#comment-151937</guid>
		<description>[...] What is Twitter and Why Scientists Need To Use It. Twitter: What’s All the Chirping About? Social media for science: The geologic perspective Why Twitter can be the Next Big Thing in Scientific Collaboration How and why scholars cite on Twitter Researchers! Join the Twitterati! Or perish! Twitter for Scientists PLoS ONE on Twitter and FriendFeed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is Twitter and Why Scientists Need To Use It. Twitter: What’s All the Chirping About? Social media for science: The geologic perspective Why Twitter can be the Next Big Thing in Scientific Collaboration How and why scholars cite on Twitter Researchers! Join the Twitterati! Or perish! Twitter for Scientists PLoS ONE on Twitter and FriendFeed [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/axzGVi3OlwY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2009/03/30/plos-one-on-twitter-and-friendfeed/#comment-151937</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What elephants want: Ranging and raiding in Asia and Africa by Rainforest Fragments Maintain Ecological Functionality | Living History</title>
		<link>http://feeds.plos.org/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~3/N_vaTlmIug4/</link>
		<dc:creator>Rainforest Fragments Maintain Ecological Functionality | Living History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/?p=8179#comment-148715</guid>
		<description>[...] Depleting agro-biodiversity a risk to food securityWhat elephants want: Ranging and raiding in Asia and Africa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Depleting agro-biodiversity a risk to food securityWhat elephants want: Ranging and raiding in Asia and Africa [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/plos/blogs/everyoneComments/~4/N_vaTlmIug4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.plos.org/everyone/2012/02/08/what-elephants-want-ranging-and-raiding-in-asia-and-africa/#comment-148715</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>

